SRK Shah Rukh Khan called a Pakistani & Terrorist by Hindu Extremist & RSS BJP VHP

[Zuraib Qasit Khan]

kashmir's freedom from indian tyranny will begin the day america gets kicked out of afghanistan south vietnam style!

Ameen Sum'mAmeen

 

[YeBeWarned]

India ka Kutta , na ghar ka .. na ghat ka

 

[Jackdaws]

hindilish hash no apochtruphiech.

you can deny it all you want, your own fellow indian confirmed it.

Try again. I am sure you can eventually type a comprehensible sentence.

 

[A.A. Khan]

Rofl if someone wishes to watch this endangered species called Indian Muslims, they can go to ghettoes of Thane, Dongri and Juhapura[Ahmedabad, Gujarat] to witness them.

Shahrukh Khan is not one.

The people with Muslim family backgrounds, or persian or arabic origin surnames in India are not Muslims. They are agnostic to hardcore Marxists who do their own Taqiyyah behind the label of secular.

All these film industry jokes are neither Muslim nor anything, they are doing dhanda. Whenever Muslim mass murder happened in India whether Godhra in 2002 or Bombay in 1993, they remained silent. An atheist who had left his ismaili faith and played Jinnah in Attenboroughs film Gandhi [1982] Alyque Padamsee was the only one who came to discuss on the issue of 93 riots initiated by hindutva terrorists Shiv Sena to media like NEw York Times.Whereas all these so-called fake cowards remained quiet. They also face personal harassment also but don't squeak a word. When Blasts happened in Hindu area in the aftermath of mob violence. This dhongi Javed Akhtar with a journo Javed Anand first signed a petition to condemn the blasts and then made a group Muslims For Secular democracy and gave some mind-boggling recommendations, like stopping use of loudspeaker for Azan. Whatever is not suited for majority we should ban it and Indians glorified this fake as a 'true indian muslim'.

For a Indian Hindu Taslima, Nasreen and these communist sh*ts are 'muslims' who are even beyond the UN charter of being called part of a group but there interests align on finishing Muslims from the subcontinent for the dream of Akhand Bharat from Iran to Myanmar.

Shahrukh Khan, Javed Akhtar and all other do pujas in their offices. They are not Muslim, neither their children so don't call them one.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Shah Rukh Khan is himself a Hindu and idol worshipper.

It's hurts. But that's the truth.

In fact, he is a bigger Sanghi than most Indians.
Not many Hindus have such a large puja ghar in their own house as SRK.

India everyday is something they have sown now they must reap the fruits of it.

Do you know what that means for us?

Do you know what a Hindu thinks when he sees his destroyed Mathura mandir, Kashi mandir, Hampi Mandira etc.?
Do you know what Sikhs feel about Aurangzeb boiling the Guru alive?
How the Buddhists feel about their Nalanda being burnt to the ground?

I know. Islam came to free them from their bondage. I know it is no different from what is considered as the highest duty as a Muslim, what our beloved Nabi SAW did too.

But the problem is the Hindus and Sikhs survived. Not many. But enough.

While you in Pakistan and Bangladesh are safe, those left in India are asked questions - do you feel sorry? It is difficult to say that no, I am proud that my ancestors came and defeated you and then destroyed your places of ignorance and jahilliya.

Also the non Muslim consolidation is increasing now. Hindus Jains Buddhists parsis Sikhs Dalits are all getting more united. And we are divided into so many this and thats.

Reaping what we all sowed means our destruction. Know this when you write something like that.

He is an Indian, Muslim or no Muslim, no different from Hindu, Sikh or any other Indian.

Only Pakistanis matter and are important regardless of religion, he is not a Pakistani.

When Pakistani Hindus and Sikhs starts demanding their temples, you will know.

@ghilzai,
I have lived in Canada, USA, France and uk, so your assumption is wrong, you are entitled to your opinion and views but he is no body to me just another Indian him being Muslim doesn’t make any difference.
I don't know how long have you lived there. live there as long as I have an you start noticing the seething hatred they have for Muslims...you realize that when see a white boy's interaction with you verses his interaction with a hindu.

What he sees in India everyday is something they have sown now they must reap the fruits of it.
yara dayr aye drust aye

well that's what I mean when I said that if he wants to be a sheepish appeaser...for the spiritual link, I was talking about Muslims in general, be they Arab or indian, whatever, not srk in particular. For example, you know you feel the pains of our palestinian Muslim brothers...

Not just the whites.

Except for Muslims, no one likes Muslim people. Islamophobia is a worldwide phenomenon.

Subah jab ayegi

 

[Skies]

People should stop giving importance all the Khan Heroes in Bolly.

They are just entertainer (sometimes good, some times bad), that's it.

No importance beyond it.

They are not icon, but actor.

They always act and pretend to be very good by making everyone happy.

Most of the Muslim actors in Bolly are twisted Muslim, or may be not even Muslim.

Javed Akhtar

These Javed Akhar, Farah Khan are so ugly.

 

[A.A. Khan]

People should stop giving importance all the Khan Heroes in Bolly.

They are just entertainer (sometimes good, some times bad), that's it.

No importance beyond it.

They are not icon, but actor.

They always act and pretend to be very good by making everyone happy.

Most of the Muslim actors in Bolly are twisted Muslim, or may be not even Muslim.

Exactly.
I've read and researched about Hindutva Terrorism or RSS for about 20 years. Whatever they do there is a specific target or interest behind it. Calling these bollywood dancers as muslims is also to get them sympathies from the larger indian muslim community which these dhandaywaalas have anything in common with. Secondly Indian Muslims 'chose' this. They knew about RSS, they knew about Hindu Mahasabha in th 1930s and 40s. They've Sangh parivar since 1970s its not something they were unaware of or their goals. They chose to stay in India.

Sangh Parivar does'nt interact with them/ Its their Hindu neighbours, friends and colleagues who call them 'Pakistani' in a joke manner and plant their bias and mindset in them. Push them to celebrate their festivals, push them to bash their own religious leaders calling them 'mullas' and backward. Use their media to indoctrinate young muslims to shun Islam for modernity and Sanatan Dharma.

The majority sunni indian Muslim's situation was completely exposed in the Sachar Commission findings. They are the worst and most marginalized. Bohris, Ismailis, shia Indians all doing well, than them. Agnostics and atheists from Sunni Muslim background are doing even better in Indian society, for a reason.

Even Hindus admit there indian system is dead against Indian Sunni Muslims, most making money are either criminal or live overseas like middle east sending money from abroad.

Btw Arshad Warsi, Shahrukh Khan are products of convents or catholic schools and prefer christianity to teach their children.

 

[Cookie Monster]

Do you know what that means for us?

Do you know what a Hindu thinks when he sees his destroyed Mathura mandir, Kashi mandir, Hampi Mandira etc.?
Do you know what Sikhs feel about Aurangzeb boiling the Guru alive?
How the Buddhists feel about their Nalanda being burnt to the ground?

I know. Islam came to free them from their bondage. I know it is no different from what is considered as the highest duty as a Muslim, what our beloved Nabi SAW did too.

But the problem is the Hindus and Sikhs survived. Not many. But enough.

While you in Pakistan and Bangladesh are safe, those left in India are asked questions - do you feel sorry? It is difficult to say that no, I am proud that my ancestors came and defeated you and then destroyed your places of ignorance and jahilliya.

Also the non Muslim consolidation is increasing now. Hindus Jains Buddhists parsis Sikhs Dalits are all getting more united. And we are divided into so many this and thats.

Reaping what we all sowed means our destruction. Know this when you write something like that

So just bcuz some rulers of the past were reckless with their temples...now the modern day Muslims must be held accountable after hundreds of years even though they had nothing to do with it?

What Aurangzeb or whoever else did hundreds of years ago were their own personal actions that should not be linked with Islam bcuz Islam actually teaches tolerance.

Nowhere in the world the current population is held responsible for the actions of their ancestors...
- Do u see Israel/US/UN holding modern day Germans responsible for what the Nazis did?
- Anyone questioning modern day Mongolians for the mass destruction caused by Mongol invasions?

Jinnah/Iqbal and others who fought for a separate country for Muslims foresaw these problems. They knew that in a democracy where Hindus are the majority, there would be problems for Muslims. Alas some Muslim leaders of that time like Abdul Kalam Azad and others like him couldn't see that. This led to a good portion of Muslims voting against the formation of Pakistan...and so we parted ways. The future of Indian Muslims is in their own hands...Pakistanis got Pakistan after many sacrifices.

 

[Hamza913]

This guy is no pushtoon, he is an Indian, at best an illegitimate decendant of Pushtoons. A pushtoon is he whose mother and father are pushtoons.

This guy usually rants about atrocities on Indian Muslims, we are not thekedar of Indian Muslims nor do we are for his kind.

Shah rukh is not a pushtoon he is an Awan, anyone who speaks pushtoon doesn’t become pushtoon.

Asalamu Alaikum

I know he's obviously not Pashtun, but he could be a Pathan (those guys who claim to be Pashtun just because they have one Pashtun ancestor, which is really stupid, by that logic I'm Baluchi).

We are all Muslims, ethnicity should not divide us.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

So just bcuz some rulers of the past were reckless with their temples...now the modern day Muslims must be held accountable after hundreds of years even though they had nothing to do with it?

What Aurangzeb or whoever else did hundreds of years ago were their own personal actions that should not be linked with Islam bcuz Islam actually teaches tolerance.

Nowhere in the world the current population is held responsible for the actions of their ancestors...
- Do u see Israel/US/UN holding modern day Germans responsible for what the Nazis did?
- Anyone questioning modern day Mongolians for the mass destruction caused by Mongol invasions?

Jinnah/Iqbal and others who fought for a separate country for Muslims foresaw these problems. They knew that in a democracy where Hindus are the majority, there would be problems for Muslims. Alas some Muslim leaders of that time like Abdul Kalam Azad and others like him couldn't see that. This led to a good portion of Muslims voting against the formation of Pakistan...and so we parted ways. The future of Indian Muslims is in their own hands...Pakistanis got Pakistan after many sacrifices.

The problem comes when they demand to rebuild these temples over which masjids stand TODAY.

Plus we are still proud of Taimur, Aurangzeb etc. As we should.

Just saying that from the Hindu perspective they have feel justified to be angered. Their holiest shrines are still in dispute or under our control.

80plus percent of Indian Muslims voted for Pakistan. Not many decided to move there then. Because we expected Hindus to remain weak and divided. We are being proved wrong.

They chose to stay in India

Not because we love Hindus. Only because India belongs to us.

 

[GumNaam]

Try again. I am sure you can eventually type a comprehensible sentence.

pleej carrekt yar echpelling...it ij caald camprihenchibal chentunch.

 

[El Sidd]

What are the chances he be killed?

Ameen Sum'mAmeen

Alhumdulilah kisi nek admi ki dua qabool hui or aap banned

 

[Jackdaws]

pleej carrekt yar echpelling...it ij caald camprihenchibal chentunch.

Yawn.

 

[GumNaam]

Yawn.

aray chotti si kaniya thakk gaee baychari...chal soja, ja...

 

[Cookie Monster]

The problem comes when they demand to rebuild these temples over which masjids stand TODAY.

Plus we are still proud of Taimur, Aurangzeb etc. As we should.

Just saying that from the Hindu perspective they have feel justified to be angered. Their holiest shrines are still in dispute or under our control.

And that would be all good and jolly had India been under the control of a Hindu emperor who wanted to tear down masjids and build mandirs.

But India is a democracy isn't it? One that was promised to be secular that would protect the religious freedom of its citizens so the events like what Aurangzeb and others did won't happen?

So this whole argument falls flat on its face.

Either they should accept that this whole secular democracy thing was all a facade and tear down masjids to build mandirs
Or own up to their promises and stop the same madness that was carried out by kings/emperors of the past.

The only places where it makes sense and Muslims should respect it too and work together to find an amicable solution is for their holy places like the Ram mandir...but I would imagine those r very few.

80plus percent of Indian Muslims voted for Pakistan. Not many decided to move there then. Because we expected Hindus to remain weak and divided. We are being proved wrong.

I've heard many Indians say that...care to provide me with proof? I wanna see how many Muslims voted for Pakistan and how many voted against.

Not because we love Hindus. Only because India belongs to us.

That is a gross miscalculation.