HeinzG
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2,040
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
actually,it does.
No it doesn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
actually,it does.
No it doesn't.
it has..don't you know that UNSC has previlage of sending troops and impose sanctions??
Kashmir issue is different from Tamil issue.Equating it with Sikh Genocide would be a right comparison.And Srilanka rejecting the probe does indicate that Srilanka was involved in war crimes.
Kashmir issue is different from Tamil issue.Equating it with Sikh Genocide would be a right comparison.And Srilanka rejecting the probe does indicate that Srilanka was involved in war crimes.
actually,it does.
U mean just coz US did injustice in Iraq, it means there was no War Crimes in SriLanka? Logic?
That is when the security of the member states are threatened. It is not punishments for wrongdoing. Just a defensive measure.
No it doesnt UN has been a royal flop when it comes to war crimes. UN has been a silent spectator in almost all the war crimes by world powers and has been successful only in punishing african countries and weak small countries.
wrong.its not Defensive Measure.for smaller countries,an well placed sanction is death warrant.
IMO UN was doing fine job for what it was created.its main problem is its not an independent entity,it has to rely on members for soldiers and fund.but apart from that,its doing a fine job.now,if you expect it to become "All powerful Superpower",its not its role.its just provide a platform to all the countries to discuss certain matter.
And also Indian abstain of conducting a referendum in Kashmir indicate that India is holding onto something that is not theirs and India is acting against the will of the Kasmiri people.
Read the conditions for referendum ......... First Pakistan has to vacate the area before conducting the referendum .
They have not done that and hence no referendum .
wrong.its not Defensive Measure.for smaller countries,an well placed sanction is death warrant.
IMO UN was doing fine job for what it was created.its main problem is its not an independent entity,it has to rely on members for soldiers and fund.but apart from that,its doing a fine job.now,if you expect it to become "All powerful Superpower",its not its role.its just provide a platform to all the countries to discuss certain matter.
And why should we allow any foreigner to conduct probes in Sri Lanka when those foreigners do not even have any legal binding with Sri Lankan people?
Why should we accept a verdict of a foreigner to be an ultimate truth?
The reality is UN is useless thing. UN couldnt stop vietnam massacres, Iraq invasion and many other war crimes done by the west. And there are no sanctions on SL.
The United Nations failed in its mandate to protect civilians in the last months of Sri Lanka's bloody civil war, a leaked draft of a highly critical internal UN report says.
"Events in Sri Lanka mark a grave failure of the UN," it concludes.
It's not a foreigner ........ It's the UN in which you are also a member .
Then UN should allow its member to do his work rather than not accepting what he do based on racist judgements.
It is not a racist judgement but a decision based on reality afaik and approved by majority heading the panel .