What's new

Sri Lanka: Dharmic Buddhist Priest threatens to slaughter Tamils residing in South Sri Lanka

. . . .
Not a good thing when facing a violent oppressor. That's why original South Asian Buddhists got violently exterminated by Hindus.
South Asian Buddhists were exterminated by barbaric muslim hordes..not Hindus...go read history .
Hinduism and Buddhism share a lot in terms of philosophies ..yes,there were minor fights but not to an extent to kill them in hundreds...
To be honest Buddhism was never a majority religion in india..it was in Afghanistan ...muslims eliminated Buddhists from that area.
 
.
South Asian Buddhists were exterminated by barbaric muslim hordes..not Hindus...go read history .
Hinduism and Buddhism share a lot in terms of philosophies ..yes,there were minor fights but not to an extent to kill them in hundreds...
To be honest Buddhism was never a majority religion in india..it was in Afghanistan ...muslims eliminated Buddhists from that area.
Well if the Buddhists in Sri Lanka feel their majority status is being threatened, they have a right to be against the minorities such as Hindus.
 
.
Wow - I guess this Buddhist Priest got militant!
Pajeet analysis claims that Dharmics only turn militant because of Islam. So why did this Dharmic turd of a bandar become militant against other dharmic turds who just happen to be Tamil?

Hinduism and Buddhism share a lot in terms of philosophies ..yes,there were minor fights but not to an extent to kill them in hundreds...
THERE VERE MINOR FIGHTS SAAR

Meanwhile from the accounts of actual Buddhists:
1698514847361.png

1698514859153.png

1698514947280.png
 
.
South Asian Buddhists were exterminated by barbaric muslim hordes..not Hindus...

Revisionist BS.
At the time the British left 4 out of 5 South Asians were Hindus, and 0 Buddhists except the few newly converted Ambedkarite Buddhists. Did Muslims selectively kill all Buddhists, while sparing the Hindus?
Buddhism was once the dominant religion in South Asia, before Pushyamitra and Brahmins took over and killed all Buddhists monks and those laymen who refused to convert.
 
.
Revisionist BS.
At the time the British left 4 out of 5 South Asians were Hindus, and 0 Buddhists except the few newly converted Ambedkarite Buddhists. Did Muslims selectively kill all Buddhists, while sparing the Hindus?
Buddhism was once the dominant religion in South Asia, before Pushyamitra and Brahmins took over and killed all Buddhists monks and those laymen who refused to convert.
When they're not blatantly lying to us and are among their own, they curse Buddhists for not towing to Tanatani Kuchra - Bharati historians still call the Buddhists of Sindh traitors for standing up to the vile incestuous Baman Raja Dahir.
 
.
South Asian Buddhists were exterminated by barbaric muslim hordes..not Hindus...go read history .
Hinduism and Buddhism share a lot in terms of philosophies ..yes,there were minor fights but not to an extent to kill them in hundreds...
To be honest Buddhism was never a majority religion in india..it was in Afghanistan ...muslims eliminated Buddhists from that area.

History??? You are telling some alien concept to these folks who believe that Buddhism got wiped out due to Hindus?
 
.
Pajeet analysis claims that Dharmics only turn militant because of Islam. So why did this Dharmic turd of a bandar become militant against other dharmic turds who just happen to be Tamil?


THERE VERE MINOR FIGHTS SAAR

Meanwhile from the accounts of actual Buddhists:
View attachment 966107
View attachment 966108
View attachment 966109
Such attacks were not abnormal in those days...muslim kings have perpetuated even violent attacks against Hinduism..but Hinduism is still there..compared to what muslims did to Hindus,what these Hindu kings did was nothing..anyway it was due to muslim inavasions and their brutalities Buddhism got wiped out(besides islam is more appealing to common masses than Buddhism...masses are generally materialistic in nature and get attracted to things which appeal to their senses
 
.
Such attacks were not abnormal in those days...muslim kings have perpetuated even violent attacks against Hinduism..but Hinduism is still there..compared to what muslims did to Hindus,what these Hindu kings did was nothing..anyway it was due to muslim inavasions and their brutalities Buddhism got wiped out(besides islam is more appealing to common masses than Buddhism...masses are generally materialistic in nature and get attracted to things which appeal to their senses
can you name a buddhist king who fought against Mughals? or made alliances with mughals? both cases can be found from hindus. buddhists were wiped out by hindus long before muslims arrived.
 
.
He forgot that he is a follower of non violence.

Pajeet analysis claims that Dharmics only turn militant because of Islam. So why did this Dharmic turd of a bandar become militant against other dharmic turds who just happen to be Tamil?


THERE VERE MINOR FIGHTS SAAR

Meanwhile from the accounts of actual Buddhists:
View attachment 966107
View attachment 966108
View attachment 966109
Calling others turd whose lives does not concern you, makes you a real turd.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom