What's new

Sri Lanka approves construction on stalled Chinese port project


The United National Party (UNP) government under Ranil Wickremesinghe is now crawling back to China. They spread hatred and racism towards the Chinese in their election campaign and sucked up to the west and India. Now they realise the west is not going to come running to invest in Sri Lanka and so they have no choice but to turn to China. The new SL government has already destroyed Sri Lanka's economy.


Absolutely pathetic!

beg.jpg


Sri Lanka had good relations with India and China under Rajapaksa but the current regime has become anti-China while maintaining its relations with India.

US NGO's and Indian intelligence had a big role to play in toppling Rajapaksa and installing an anti-China regime to diminish Chinese influence.

The current regime stopped all Chinese submarines visits, cancelled all Chinese projects and their foreign minister went to Japan and trash talked China.


Well said.

Don't expect someone like @Gibbs who ran away to Australia to understand.
 
.
China-funded mega port city to help generate new business in Sri Lanka: report
- Xinhua | English.news.cn


COLOMBO, Dec. 15 (Xinhua) -- A mega China funded Port City project in the capital will help generate new investments and new buyers of real-estate in new businesses in Sri Lanka, the China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) said on Tuesday, citing a report.

In a media release, the CHEC noted that the recently released Supplementary Environmental Impact Report (SEIA) for the Colombo Port City (CPC) project said that the main objective of the Port City was to create a regional business hub - a distinctly branded city, with high quality public spaces and infrastructure facilities, which would attract local and international developers and investors.

"The report states that the Colombo Port City has the capacity to contribute towards service sector oriented growth and development by attracting high profile FDI's and generating a wide range of direct and indirect benefits to the national economy," the release said.

The project, which is to be implemented over a 25-year period, does not involve replacing any economic activities in the area of its location or its immediate neighborhood. Thus, the benefit generated by the entire reclaimed land becomes an additional asset to Sri Lanka as a result of a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), the release said.

The 1.4 billion U.S. dollar mega Port City project funded by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) Ltd was suspended in March this year after concerns were raised over some aspects of the project.

However after a recently concluded SEIA report conducted by an independent committee, the project was given the go ahead by the Sri Lankan government and is now expected to resume in February.

According to the CHEC, the positive impacts of the project include employment creation, enhanced foreign investment, positive revenue generation to the government, transfer of technology and value added contribution to the national economy.

The SEIA report further states that the proposed Port City has the capacity to significantly contribute to the economic well-being of the Colombo city and the Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR).

Colombo Port City won’t cause environmental disruption, says EIA | Lanka Business Online

port-city-sri-lanka.jpg


Dec 15, 2015 (LBO) – The proposed Colombo Port City has a minimal environmental impact on the reclamation site and the coastal zone around the area, a supplementary environmental impact assessment, now available for public consultation, states.

Because of the impact of sand dredging north of the port city site, an income support program will be implemented for communities engaged in fishing, the report adds.

The report can be downloaded here.

“Due to the construction of the Colombo South Harbour, the incremental environmental impacts from the construction of Colombo Port City is minimal/negligible at the reclamation site and the coastal zone to the North and South of the site,” the report states.

Studies conclude that the Port City will also not cause coastal erosion.

Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake said recently that the government is satisfied with the EIA, according to a media report. The EIA is now available for public consultation.

“We have given all the necessary clearances. Now it is up to the investors to sort out the minor details,” Karunanayake, told the South China Morning Post newspaper.

The 1.4 billion US dollar Port City is to be constructed between the Southern edge of the new Colombo South Port and the Fort Lighthouse.The total area of land available under the project will be 269 hectares.

Developed over a 25-year period, the Port City will have three stages with 7 hectares released for development per year.

According to the plan, 63 hectares of marketable land and 96 hectares of common land will be for the government, equivalent to 59 percent of the total, or 159 hectares.

The project company will receive 41 percent of the reclaimed land for marketing to developers, equal to 110 hectares.

The plan envisages significant economic benefits to the island with foreign direct investment being the biggest approved by the BOI for a single project.

In terms of environmental impacts, sand extraction would occur at depths of 15m or more, thereby having no impact on coastal erosion, the report states.

“The Kelani River is believed to contribute some 100,000 to 200,000 m3/year to the sediment budget of the area. Historically this is believed to have been much higher, perhaps 400,000 m3/year, but has declined due to sand mining and development upstream,” the report said.

“As a consequence there has been ongoing erosion to the coast to the north of the Kelani. Therefore, since Port City is in the shadow of the Colombo South Port breakwater, it has no impact on coastal erosion north of Colombo Port.”

A total of 11 different quarry sites with required approvals located in Kaduwela, Hanwella, Padukka, Delgoda and Divulpitiya area have been surveyed for obtaining quarry material for construction of necessary structures to protect the reclamation, it said.

The 11 quarry sites represent around 7-9 percent of the total registered quarries in the Colombo and Gampaha districts.

The impact of this project on the national quarry material requirement would be negligible to the construction industry, the report states.

Sand dredging is expected to cause “local and temporary impacts on the biological environment due to the removal of benthic fauna and increasing turbidity as a result of an increase in suspended particles in water columns.”

Due to this, 500 million rupees would be allocation to the Ministry of Fisheries for income support and benefits program for communities engaged in fishing, with supplementary funds allocated as needed.

This would be to uplift the socio-economic conditions and any loss of fishing grounds of fishermen impacted by the sand extraction, the report states.

In terms of impact on stock of fish, “there will be no reduction in fishing grounds in the reclamation area, since this is not an ideal habitat for fish breeding due to already silted conditions.”

Several international consultants together with local specialists will advise on the project.

This includes Atkins of UK for master plan review, Aecom for utility design, road design and landscaping, Jones Lang La Salle and CB Richard Ellis for financial and marketing pre-feasibility, and CDR International of the Netherlands for technical review of designs of the contractor.

The land will be available for various purposes such as commercial, residential, health and educational developments but not for industrial activities.

The Port City will have around 45 ha of public parks, 9 times the size of Galle Face Green, anchored by a 22 ha central park.There will also be a beach with a lagoon suitable for swimming and water recreational activities.

The port city project, under a Chinese developer, stalled after the new administration questioned project approvals by the last regime.

The investor, China Communications and Construction Company (CCCC), is a public listed company in Hong Kong and a Fortune 500 construction and real estate company. The company has assets of over 100 billion dollars.

Total FDI in the reclamation stage of the Port City is envisaged at 1400 million dollars, the largest FDI approved by the BOI to date. The financial investment in the project requires no government guarantees.

port-city-4-sri-lanka.jpg


port-city-3-sri-lanka.jpg


@Shotgunner51
 
.
China-funded mega port city to help generate new business in Sri Lanka: report
- Xinhua | English.news.cn


COLOMBO, Dec. 15 (Xinhua) -- A mega China funded Port City project in the capital will help generate new investments and new buyers of real-estate in new businesses in Sri Lanka, the China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) said on Tuesday, citing a report.

In a media release, the CHEC noted that the recently released Supplementary Environmental Impact Report (SEIA) for the Colombo Port City (CPC) project said that the main objective of the Port City was to create a regional business hub - a distinctly branded city, with high quality public spaces and infrastructure facilities, which would attract local and international developers and investors.

"The report states that the Colombo Port City has the capacity to contribute towards service sector oriented growth and development by attracting high profile FDI's and generating a wide range of direct and indirect benefits to the national economy," the release said.

The project, which is to be implemented over a 25-year period, does not involve replacing any economic activities in the area of its location or its immediate neighborhood. Thus, the benefit generated by the entire reclaimed land becomes an additional asset to Sri Lanka as a result of a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), the release said.

The 1.4 billion U.S. dollar mega Port City project funded by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) Ltd was suspended in March this year after concerns were raised over some aspects of the project.

However after a recently concluded SEIA report conducted by an independent committee, the project was given the go ahead by the Sri Lankan government and is now expected to resume in February.

According to the CHEC, the positive impacts of the project include employment creation, enhanced foreign investment, positive revenue generation to the government, transfer of technology and value added contribution to the national economy.

The SEIA report further states that the proposed Port City has the capacity to significantly contribute to the economic well-being of the Colombo city and the Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR).

Colombo Port City won’t cause environmental disruption, says EIA | Lanka Business Online

port-city-sri-lanka.jpg


Dec 15, 2015 (LBO) – The proposed Colombo Port City has a minimal environmental impact on the reclamation site and the coastal zone around the area, a supplementary environmental impact assessment, now available for public consultation, states.

Because of the impact of sand dredging north of the port city site, an income support program will be implemented for communities engaged in fishing, the report adds.

The report can be downloaded here.

“Due to the construction of the Colombo South Harbour, the incremental environmental impacts from the construction of Colombo Port City is minimal/negligible at the reclamation site and the coastal zone to the North and South of the site,” the report states.

Studies conclude that the Port City will also not cause coastal erosion.

Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake said recently that the government is satisfied with the EIA, according to a media report. The EIA is now available for public consultation.

“We have given all the necessary clearances. Now it is up to the investors to sort out the minor details,” Karunanayake, told the South China Morning Post newspaper.

The 1.4 billion US dollar Port City is to be constructed between the Southern edge of the new Colombo South Port and the Fort Lighthouse.The total area of land available under the project will be 269 hectares.

Developed over a 25-year period, the Port City will have three stages with 7 hectares released for development per year.

According to the plan, 63 hectares of marketable land and 96 hectares of common land will be for the government, equivalent to 59 percent of the total, or 159 hectares.

The project company will receive 41 percent of the reclaimed land for marketing to developers, equal to 110 hectares.

The plan envisages significant economic benefits to the island with foreign direct investment being the biggest approved by the BOI for a single project.

In terms of environmental impacts, sand extraction would occur at depths of 15m or more, thereby having no impact on coastal erosion, the report states.

“The Kelani River is believed to contribute some 100,000 to 200,000 m3/year to the sediment budget of the area. Historically this is believed to have been much higher, perhaps 400,000 m3/year, but has declined due to sand mining and development upstream,” the report said.

“As a consequence there has been ongoing erosion to the coast to the north of the Kelani. Therefore, since Port City is in the shadow of the Colombo South Port breakwater, it has no impact on coastal erosion north of Colombo Port.”

A total of 11 different quarry sites with required approvals located in Kaduwela, Hanwella, Padukka, Delgoda and Divulpitiya area have been surveyed for obtaining quarry material for construction of necessary structures to protect the reclamation, it said.

The 11 quarry sites represent around 7-9 percent of the total registered quarries in the Colombo and Gampaha districts.

The impact of this project on the national quarry material requirement would be negligible to the construction industry, the report states.

Sand dredging is expected to cause “local and temporary impacts on the biological environment due to the removal of benthic fauna and increasing turbidity as a result of an increase in suspended particles in water columns.”

Due to this, 500 million rupees would be allocation to the Ministry of Fisheries for income support and benefits program for communities engaged in fishing, with supplementary funds allocated as needed.

This would be to uplift the socio-economic conditions and any loss of fishing grounds of fishermen impacted by the sand extraction, the report states.

In terms of impact on stock of fish, “there will be no reduction in fishing grounds in the reclamation area, since this is not an ideal habitat for fish breeding due to already silted conditions.”

Several international consultants together with local specialists will advise on the project.

This includes Atkins of UK for master plan review, Aecom for utility design, road design and landscaping, Jones Lang La Salle and CB Richard Ellis for financial and marketing pre-feasibility, and CDR International of the Netherlands for technical review of designs of the contractor.

The land will be available for various purposes such as commercial, residential, health and educational developments but not for industrial activities.

The Port City will have around 45 ha of public parks, 9 times the size of Galle Face Green, anchored by a 22 ha central park.There will also be a beach with a lagoon suitable for swimming and water recreational activities.

The port city project, under a Chinese developer, stalled after the new administration questioned project approvals by the last regime.

The investor, China Communications and Construction Company (CCCC), is a public listed company in Hong Kong and a Fortune 500 construction and real estate company. The company has assets of over 100 billion dollars.

Total FDI in the reclamation stage of the Port City is envisaged at 1400 million dollars, the largest FDI approved by the BOI to date. The financial investment in the project requires no government guarantees.

port-city-4-sri-lanka.jpg


port-city-3-sri-lanka.jpg


@Shotgunner51

More progress is seen, nice!
Btw what does BOI stands for?
 
. . . .
China-funded mega port city to help generate new business in Sri Lanka: report
- Xinhua | English.news.cn


COLOMBO, Dec. 15 (Xinhua) -- A mega China funded Port City project in the capital will help generate new investments and new buyers of real-estate in new businesses in Sri Lanka, the China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) said on Tuesday, citing a report.

In a media release, the CHEC noted that the recently released Supplementary Environmental Impact Report (SEIA) for the Colombo Port City (CPC) project said that the main objective of the Port City was to create a regional business hub - a distinctly branded city, with high quality public spaces and infrastructure facilities, which would attract local and international developers and investors.

"The report states that the Colombo Port City has the capacity to contribute towards service sector oriented growth and development by attracting high profile FDI's and generating a wide range of direct and indirect benefits to the national economy," the release said.

The project, which is to be implemented over a 25-year period, does not involve replacing any economic activities in the area of its location or its immediate neighborhood. Thus, the benefit generated by the entire reclaimed land becomes an additional asset to Sri Lanka as a result of a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), the release said.

The 1.4 billion U.S. dollar mega Port City project funded by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) Ltd was suspended in March this year after concerns were raised over some aspects of the project.

However after a recently concluded SEIA report conducted by an independent committee, the project was given the go ahead by the Sri Lankan government and is now expected to resume in February.

According to the CHEC, the positive impacts of the project include employment creation, enhanced foreign investment, positive revenue generation to the government, transfer of technology and value added contribution to the national economy.

The SEIA report further states that the proposed Port City has the capacity to significantly contribute to the economic well-being of the Colombo city and the Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR).

Colombo Port City won’t cause environmental disruption, says EIA | Lanka Business Online

port-city-sri-lanka.jpg


Dec 15, 2015 (LBO) – The proposed Colombo Port City has a minimal environmental impact on the reclamation site and the coastal zone around the area, a supplementary environmental impact assessment, now available for public consultation, states.

Because of the impact of sand dredging north of the port city site, an income support program will be implemented for communities engaged in fishing, the report adds.

The report can be downloaded here.

“Due to the construction of the Colombo South Harbour, the incremental environmental impacts from the construction of Colombo Port City is minimal/negligible at the reclamation site and the coastal zone to the North and South of the site,” the report states.

Studies conclude that the Port City will also not cause coastal erosion.

Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake said recently that the government is satisfied with the EIA, according to a media report. The EIA is now available for public consultation.

“We have given all the necessary clearances. Now it is up to the investors to sort out the minor details,” Karunanayake, told the South China Morning Post newspaper.

The 1.4 billion US dollar Port City is to be constructed between the Southern edge of the new Colombo South Port and the Fort Lighthouse.The total area of land available under the project will be 269 hectares.

Developed over a 25-year period, the Port City will have three stages with 7 hectares released for development per year.

According to the plan, 63 hectares of marketable land and 96 hectares of common land will be for the government, equivalent to 59 percent of the total, or 159 hectares.

The project company will receive 41 percent of the reclaimed land for marketing to developers, equal to 110 hectares.

The plan envisages significant economic benefits to the island with foreign direct investment being the biggest approved by the BOI for a single project.

In terms of environmental impacts, sand extraction would occur at depths of 15m or more, thereby having no impact on coastal erosion, the report states.

“The Kelani River is believed to contribute some 100,000 to 200,000 m3/year to the sediment budget of the area. Historically this is believed to have been much higher, perhaps 400,000 m3/year, but has declined due to sand mining and development upstream,” the report said.

“As a consequence there has been ongoing erosion to the coast to the north of the Kelani. Therefore, since Port City is in the shadow of the Colombo South Port breakwater, it has no impact on coastal erosion north of Colombo Port.”

A total of 11 different quarry sites with required approvals located in Kaduwela, Hanwella, Padukka, Delgoda and Divulpitiya area have been surveyed for obtaining quarry material for construction of necessary structures to protect the reclamation, it said.

The 11 quarry sites represent around 7-9 percent of the total registered quarries in the Colombo and Gampaha districts.

The impact of this project on the national quarry material requirement would be negligible to the construction industry, the report states.

Sand dredging is expected to cause “local and temporary impacts on the biological environment due to the removal of benthic fauna and increasing turbidity as a result of an increase in suspended particles in water columns.”

Due to this, 500 million rupees would be allocation to the Ministry of Fisheries for income support and benefits program for communities engaged in fishing, with supplementary funds allocated as needed.

This would be to uplift the socio-economic conditions and any loss of fishing grounds of fishermen impacted by the sand extraction, the report states.

In terms of impact on stock of fish, “there will be no reduction in fishing grounds in the reclamation area, since this is not an ideal habitat for fish breeding due to already silted conditions.”

Several international consultants together with local specialists will advise on the project.

This includes Atkins of UK for master plan review, Aecom for utility design, road design and landscaping, Jones Lang La Salle and CB Richard Ellis for financial and marketing pre-feasibility, and CDR International of the Netherlands for technical review of designs of the contractor.

The land will be available for various purposes such as commercial, residential, health and educational developments but not for industrial activities.

The Port City will have around 45 ha of public parks, 9 times the size of Galle Face Green, anchored by a 22 ha central park.There will also be a beach with a lagoon suitable for swimming and water recreational activities.

The port city project, under a Chinese developer, stalled after the new administration questioned project approvals by the last regime.

The investor, China Communications and Construction Company (CCCC), is a public listed company in Hong Kong and a Fortune 500 construction and real estate company. The company has assets of over 100 billion dollars.

Total FDI in the reclamation stage of the Port City is envisaged at 1400 million dollars, the largest FDI approved by the BOI to date. The financial investment in the project requires no government guarantees.

port-city-4-sri-lanka.jpg


port-city-3-sri-lanka.jpg


@Shotgunner51


This is Sri Lanka's Minister of Finance Ravi Karunanayake:


all.jpg


Ravi Karunanayake's racism towards the Chinese on display in public. Ranil Wickremasinghe and his acolytes are spending their days in power denigrating China and ingratiating themselves to the west and India. Neither India or the USA stood by Sri Lanka as the LTTE was being defeated. The west tried to end the final push against Prabhakaran and India refused to help Sri Lanka militarily. It was only China that stood by Sri Lanka steadfastly providing us with political, economic and military support. Even after the war it is China that has stood by Sri Lanka like a rock. Now Ranil and co are trying to destroy Sino-Lankan relations through their hostile speech and actions. Do they really think they are doing Sri Lanka a favour?

More progress is seen, nice!
Btw what does BOI stands for?


There is no progress. This is what it looked like in January 2015. The whole project has not moved forwards an inch since the new Sri Lankan regime.
 
. .
This is Sri Lanka's Minister of Finance Ravi Karunanayake:


all.jpg


Ravi Karunanayake's racism towards the Chinese on display in public. Ranil Wickremasinghe and his acolytes are spending their days in power denigrating China and ingratiating themselves to the west and India. Neither India or the USA stood by Sri Lanka as the LTTE was being defeated. The west tried to end the final push against Prabhakaran and India refused to help Sri Lanka militarily. It was only China that stood by Sri Lanka steadfastly providing us with political, economic and military support. Even after the war it is China that has stood by Sri Lanka like a rock. Now Ranil and co are trying to destroy Sino-Lankan relations through their hostile speech and actions. Do they really think they are doing Sri Lanka a favour?




There is no progress. This is what it looked like in January 2015. The whole project has not moved forwards an inch since the new Sri Lankan regime.
Current Sri lanka government need to be taught a lesson. The Chinese will make sure they learn a hard one.
 
.
Current Sri lanka government need to be taught a lesson. The Chinese will make sure they learn a hard one.

It sure does. They have driven Sri Lanka into the ground. The economy is failing, there are no infrastructure projects, Sri Lanka's soldiers who ended the war are being persecuted, old allies are being thrown aside...the list just goes on.

The USA is very happy though.

I don't understand why China continues to maintain a nice face to the current Sri Lankan regime. The fools who are running Sri Lanka now need to be told where to get off.
 
.
LOL.... One by One lies being exposed.

What lies? There were no lies only allegations by Enviroumental groups as MR's EIA was incomplete. The govt promised to restart the project if the new EIA debunked the allegations.
And its planned to be under the Misnitry of Megapolis and Western Province development instead of the Ports Authority who cannot engage in Urban development and Land reclamation now.

The govt is clearing all the problems in the project as they said.
The remaining issue is giving freehold land to Chinese company. All foreign investors are given a 99 year lease according to the law. Discussions with the Chinese company is going on to change the agreement so China will get leasehold land instead of the freehold parts.

Its proposed to allow foriegn investors own land but JVP opposes it so I don't expect it to change.
 
Last edited:
.
What lies? There were no lies only allegations by Enviroumental groups as MR's EIA was incomplete. The govt promised to restart the project if the new EIA debunked the allegations.
And its planned to be under the Misnitry of Megapolis and Western Province development instead of the Ports Authority who cannot engage in Urban development and Land reclamation now.

The govt is clearing all the problems in the project as they said.
The remaining issue is giving freehold land to Chinese company. All foreign investors are given a 99 year lease according to the law. Discussions with the Chinese company is going on to change the agreement so China will get leasehold land instead of the freehold parts.

Its proposed to allow foriegn investors own land but JVP opposes it so I don't expect it to change.



Please take your corrupt yahapalanaya a$$holes and shove it. Sri Lanka is being destroyed. It is going nowhere. The handling of the Colombo Port City by Ranil and co has been an utter farce; it has everything to do with politics and kow towing to India and the west and nothing to do with the environment. Anyone with half a brain can see that.
 
.
What lies? There were no lies only allegations by Enviroumental groups as MR's EIA was incomplete. The govt promised to restart the project if the new EIA debunked the allegations.
And its planned to be under the Misnitry of Megapolis and Western Province development instead of the Ports Authority who cannot engage in Urban development and Land reclamation now.

The govt is clearing all the problems in the project as they said.
The remaining issue is giving freehold land to Chinese company. All foreign investors are given a 99 year lease according to the law. Discussions with the Chinese company is going on to change the agreement so China will get leasehold land instead of the freehold parts.

Its proposed to allow foriegn investors own land but JVP opposes it so I don't expect it to change.

What are the environmental risks of Port City project and how will they suddenly dissapier when UNP gov. gave it a go ahead? AFAIK no part of the original plan is revised to suite the so called environmental concern. Even what you say is that the gov. is going to do a new EIA. Nothing has changed.
 
.
What are the environmental risks of Port City project and how will they suddenly dissapier when UNP gov. gave it a go ahead? AFAIK no part of the original plan is revised to suite the so called environmental concern. Even what you say is that the gov. is going to do a new EIA. Nothing has changed.


Don't expect the dumbo to understand; he has been licking Ranil's boots for so long that he will say absolutely anything to exonerate his useless boss despite monumental policy failures.
 
.
What are the environmental risks of Port City project and how will they suddenly dissapier when UNP gov. gave it a go ahead? AFAIK no part of the original plan is revised to suite the so called environmental concern. Even what you say is that the gov. is going to do a new EIA. Nothing has changed

The enviroumental risks were only allegations by various enviroumental groups. No one said anything about revising the plan. The govt promised to answer for all allegations and proceed with the project depending on the results of the EIA.
The govt promised to adress all the allegations against it and its being done. Talks are still going on with Chinese on changing the areas where China get Freehold ownership to leasehold
 
.
Back
Top Bottom