SQ chowdhury and mujaheed hanged for war crime

[Nilgiri]

3. We had selected 195 PA officers to face trial for what they did in BD. The trials were to follow Nuremberg and Tokyo models.For this purpose relevant international agencies were contacted and instructions were issued to appointed prosecutors and BD military officers. Their prison cells were prepared. I myself was involved in the process from Army HQ. Late Attorney Genl Aminul Huq was also in the team. A DIG War Crimes Tribunal was set up in an abandoned hose near the lake at the end of RD # 3/4, DRA. Again India frustrated our efforts by refusing to hand over these POWs to us - and by eventually allowing them to go back home.

As much as we disagree and have contempt for each other, Saab, I will have to 100% agree with you on this one.

India should not have been in such a rush to allow these POWs to go back to Pakistan, especially those wanted by Bangladesh for war crimes trials.

A big monumental blunder by I.G that is a shameful one in India's history. I can see why that initial disgust was put in you for India (North Indians especially since they dominated the political and military back then and still do to a large extent) which as since unforunately expanded and taken deep control of you. I can thus empathise and can only offer my own personal regret and distaste for what was done.....I still do not understand why. It severely undermined the justice for the genocide and its victims. I cannot forgive India for what was done here, what it could have meant for India - BAN relations....why did we still have such a soft spot for Pakistan military. A big big defeat for the conscience of Bangladesh and India.

I feel with the diplomatic umbrella afforded by the USSR, India could have definitely cooperated fully with Bangladesh's demands and done a full nuremberg style for P.A criminals....and probably got other concessions from Pakistan too (although these trials should have been the bare unnegotiable minimum).

Can you please give us any more such insight/opinion on this matter (if possible) since you are a veteran and was actually there. I am compiling information regarding 1971 war from Bangladeshi perspective.

 

[dray]

How many are left?

 

[Saiful Islam]

How many are left?

50 million.

 

[asad71]

How many are left?

It is now totally political. SHW/BAL continue arresting people from all corners and charging them with war crimes. There is little doubt that SHW/BAL is moving ahead to secularize BD eliminating pro-Muslim elements.

 

[Nilgiri]

There is little doubt that SHW/BAL is moving ahead to secularize BD eliminating pro-terrorist elements.

FIFY.

You better keep staying in Canada where its safe for your lot.

 

[bafxet]

As much as we disagree and have contempt for each other, Saab, I will have to 100% agree with you on this one.

India should not have been in such a rush to allow these POWs to go back to Pakistan, especially those wanted by Bangladesh for war crimes trials.

A big monumental blunder by I.G that is a shameful one in India's history. I can see why that initial disgust was put in you for India (North Indians especially since they dominated the political and military back then and still do to a large extent) which as since unforunately expanded and taken deep control of you. I can thus empathise and can only offer my own personal regret and distaste for what was done.....I still do not understand why. It severely undermined the justice for the genocide and its victims. I cannot forgive India for what was done here, what it could have meant for India - BAN relations....why did we still have such a soft spot for Pakistan military. A big big defeat for the conscience of Bangladesh and India.

I feel with the diplomatic umbrella afforded by the USSR, India could have definitely cooperated fully with Bangladesh's demands and done a full nuremberg style for P.A criminals....and probably got other concessions from Pakistan too (although these trials should have been the bare unnegotiable minimum).

Can you please give us any more such insight/opinion on this matter (if possible) since you are a veteran and was actually there. I am compiling information regarding 1971 war from Bangladeshi perspective.

1. PA acted in what was inside the country I.e Pakistan.

2. The land of Bengal is very fertile in producing traitors in late history Mir Jaffar and in modern history Sheikh Mujeeb.

What else can we expect from a nation who brutally killed not only his liberator (as they say) but also to his whole family.

What a shame

 

[Nilgiri]

1. PA acted in what was inside the country I.e Pakistan.

So did the British in North America between 1775 and 1783. Denying people their rights only ends one way, history has shown us.

2. The land of Bengal is very fertile in producing traitors in late history Mir Jaffar and in modern history Sheikh Mujeeb.

Bengalis disown Mir Jaffar. They see Sheikh Mujib as a great hero in their eyes.

What else can we expect from a nation who brutally killed not only his liberator (as they say) but also to his whole family.

A poll was not taken by the nation asking should he be killed. Conspiracies are hatched and acted out in the world of politics. Was entire Indian nation responsible for assassination of Gandhi?

 

[bongbang]

Mir Jaffar

Mir Jaffer was Turk. Mir Jaffer was Bhutto.

Sheikh Mujeeb

Sheikh Mujib is lot like Siraj ud daula. Fought for rights of people but betrayed by home and away conspiracies also not so potent in his strategy as well.

 

[dray]

50 million.

It is now totally political. SHW/BAL continue arresting people from all corners and charging them with war crimes. There is little doubt that SHW/BAL is moving ahead to secularize BD eliminating pro-Muslim elements.

I mean how many are under trial or have been convicted and awaiting execution.

 

[bafxet]

So did the British in North America between 1775 and 1783. Denying people their rights only ends one way, history has shown us.

In 1776 US came into being and any action there was an intrusion in the affairs of another nation. PA acted against an insurgency. PA never acted outside Pakistan.

Bengalis disown Mir Jaffar. They see Sheikh Mujib as a great hero in their eyes.

Killing hero, what a shame for a country. BD perhaps has the sole owner of doing so.



A poll was not taken by the nation asking should he be killed. Conspiracies are hatched and acted out in the world of politics. Was entire Indian nation responsible for assassination of Gandhi?

Ghandi, unlike Sh Mujib, was not an individuals act

 

[Nilgiri]

Ghandi, unlike Sh Mujib, was not an individuals act

Is that for you to decide or for Bangladeshi people to decide?

 

[bafxet]

How was Mujeeb murder is written in the history. Sh Haseena survived because she was in Germany. If this how you treat your hero, then I am surprised on hanging JI leaders.

Further I'm not saying anything from my own.

 

[asad71]

1. PA acted in what was inside the country I.e Pakistan.

2. The land of Bengal is very fertile in producing traitors in late history Mir Jaffar and in modern history Sheikh Mujeeb.

What else can we expect from a nation who brutally killed not only his liberator (as they say) but also to his whole family.

What a shame

1.Let us keep Mir Jafar and Mir Sadiq, etc out of this discussion. Fyi, the last in the ruling line of Mir Jafar war Iskandar Mirza. He was used by Jinnah for his intimate knowledge of NWFP and personal connections with the tribal Maliks in the second voting which came in favor of Pakistan. Mirza was the last GG of Pakistan as well as the first President. It was he who had declared Pakistan an Islamic Republic. Ironically the lad Bhutto, that he had patronized on the recommendation of his Iranian Begum, had refused to allow him to be buried in Pakistan. They were all Shiahs. Thus the last scion of Mir Jafar family, the first Sandhurst commissioned officer of SA, the last GG and the first President of Pakistan lies buried in Iran courtesy the Shah e Iran.

2. Read Hamudoor Rahman Commission report. Go through Yahya's testimony in court. And read through neutral observer's comments. It was the illegitimate son of Shahnawaz and his Hindu kothewalli Lakhi Bai who led the conspiracy to breakup Pakistan. Ayub was the first Sunni ruler of Pakistan, and allowing Mujib would re-establish the Sunnis after ousting Shia Yahya. At no time, and there is absolutely no proof/record that the Sheikh wanted to break away from W Pak. All he wanted was autonomy for all parties as envisaged in The Six Points. The elections were held on that basis.

3. On taking over power Gen Ziaul Huq had famously uttered, "Main ees haramzada ko Shakar Parian sey lat kaunga." No, Bhutto was not hanged for the murder of Nawab Kasuri but for breaking up Pakistan. And Zia had received thorough first hand info about the debauched group of Yahya, Bhutto, Peerzada,etc from Adm Ahsan, Gen Yaqub, Gen Arif and others.

 

[Saiful Islam]

How was Mujeeb murder is written in the history. Sh Haseena survived because she was in Germany. If this how you treat your hero, then I am surprised on hanging JI leaders.

Further I'm not saying anything from my own.

From what you have gathered, then you know what kind of country BD is...