AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
But sufficient evidence is enough for ICC to suspend the suspected players. Legally speaking, there's no way PCB can nail Lorgat even if the player's been proved innocent. Ajay Jadeja was facing 4 years ban by BCCI, court acquitted him of all charges but he couldn't do anything to Dalmia with all his political clout.
What evidence is 'sufficient'? Isn't the purpose of the yet to be complete SY investigation precisely to weight the evidence and come to a determination of whether the concerned individuals are guilty or not?
If so, then how has the ICC managed to obtain 'sufficient evidence' before the SY investigation is even complete, and without even interviewing/questioning the main parties involved?