What's new

Spilt Milk NadeemF.Paracha opens his heart !!

Leader

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
29,159
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
December 27th will bring late Benazir Bhutto’s fourth death anniversary.

Benazir was a vital figure for my generation of college students. In the 1980s she was to us what her father had been to the youth in the late 1960s.

Our romance with Benazir reached a peak when she arrived in Lahore in April 1986 from London where she had been forced into exile by the Zia-ul-Haq dictatorship after it failed to implicate her in the 1981 plane hijacking case undertaken on the behest of her renegade brothers, Mir Murtaza and Shanawaz.

The controversial hijacking of the PIA plane, pulled off in the name of Al-Zulfikar, involved some of the most emotional and militant youth belonging to the PPP’s student-wing, the Peoples Students Federation (PSF).

apazp1_hj.jpg


As a reaction, between 1984 and 1986, a number of PSF members and PPP labour leaders – all of them belonging to poor, downtrodden families from Karachi, interior Sindh and the Punjab – were hanged to death by the dictatorship.

Some of the most prominent young men implicated for undertaking Al-Zulfikar activities and hanged were Nasir Baloch (from Karachi’s slum area, Lyari), Razzaq Jharna (from a working class family of Lahore) Ayaz Sammu (a Sindhi residing in Karachi) and Usman Ghani, Idris Toti and Idris Baig (all from working class families of the Punjab).

It is interesting to note that today in Pakistan scores of major sectarian terrorists and violent extremists have been captured but released by the Lahore High Court (due to ‘lack of evidence’), but in the 1980s, student and labour leaders were implicated for terrorism at the drop of a hat, arrested, tortured and hanged after half-baked trials.

What’s more, the oldest among those hanged was 25 years old, and the youngest was said to be no more than 16!

Hundreds of PSF cadres and youth belonging to other progressive student groups were hauled and kept in jails, severely tortured and humiliated.

I am an eyewitness to a spat of disappearances from the college where I studied between 1984 and 1987 (Saint Patrick’s Government College, Karachi), and from where I too was picked up (in May 1984) because I was a member of the PSF and had taken part in various anti-Zia rallies at the college.

I was taken to the then notorious CIA (Crime Investigation Agency) office in Karachi’s Saddar area, also called the “555 thana,” grabbed by my unruly ‘revolutionary’ hair, kicked and punched and taken on a tour of the thana’s “special rooms” where I saw a man, stripped stark naked and made to lie on a slab of ice and whipped (with a leather stick) by a cop.

I almost broke down when a couple of slaps, punches and abuses later, two cops showed me the sight of a college comrade hanging upside down from the roof and bleeding from the nose.

“See,” shouted a cop. “This is what we do to anti-Pakistan agents and communist Russia funded dogs such as you!”

My ordeal lasted almost ten hours before I was finally released. The very next day I went straight back to continue being ‘communist Russia funded dog!’


So when in 1986 Benazir arrived to the thunderous cheers of the mammoth gathering of Lahoris, I too travelled by train with a dozen students from my college to welcome the spectacle.

It was a scene legends are made of, as we struggled in the thronging milieu of simple, emotional, working class Pakistanis, to catch a glimpse of a frail young woman shouting out rhetorical challenges at the dictator and his army of Maududi-quoting officers and people-bashing “mujahids.”Her father’s populism and oratory had bagged him his share of what are called “jeeyalas” – and/or highly emotional men and women, mostly from subjugated classes, to whom the PPP was almost like a religion. Many jeeyalas had even went to the extent of setting themselves on fire in Rawalpindi in 1979 to mourn and protest Z A. Bhutto’s farcical trial and hanging.

Similarly, that immense April 1986 rally saw the birth of Benazir’s jeeyalas, and I have no qualms in confessing that as a volatile intermediate college lad I became one as well – especially after the day of the rally when PPP activists came together in the streets of Lahore and four young PSF members were shot dead by the cops. Our group was chased all the way to the Lahore Railway Station, and we had to literally jump inside a moving Karachi-bound train from the train’s windows to escape the uniformed brutes!

At the inauguration of the first Benazir Bhutto government in 1988, we saw (on TV) scenes of young men (and some women), appearing from jails, looking twice their age and both physically and psychologically damaged. Director Saira Kazmi’s PTV serial ‘Tapish’ (1989) brilliantly captures the ordeals of such men and women and the culture of student resistance in Pakistan during the Zia regime.

Most of them had been kept in torture chambers for more than six years! So much so, that their parents had given up on them as dead. I remember, two of my college colleagues who were picked up in 1984 with me, were not seen again until December 1988. One of them was from Karachi’s Burns Road area (who later joined the MQM) and one was from the Sindhi city of Moro. Their mothers kept coming to the college for three years pleading the college administration to please find out what became of their sons.

Many of us carried these memories well in to the 1990s, when we joined different fields as young adults. During the tumultuous “decade of democracy” in which Benazir’s PPP and Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N became tools in the hands of the official desk-top jihadis (such as former ISI big-wigs), background military maneuvers and their religious and industrialist lackeys, my generation of Benazir sympathizers became awkward PPP apologists.

But never once did we doubt the astute political and intellectual acumen and the promise Benazir was made of.

This brings me to this slain promise’s first death anniversary (in December 2008). I decided to follow it on the main TV news channels. The moving programs once again brought a tear in my eye just as her assassination had done in late 2007. But the tear this time was not of sadness alone. It was also of a resigned hope and a bit of anger.

As the channels paid glowing tributes to Benazir, and anchormen and even politicians from the right-wing uttered long speeches about how she is being so dearly missed, I couldn’t help but let out a cynical chuckle. Because I know, had the woman been alive today, the same media would have been maligning her to the extreme.

I remember how awfully she was treated by the print media in the 1990s, but I also remember the pathetic reactionary and snide remarks by anchormen about her when she returned to Pakistan in 2007 (from a self-imposed exile).

What a miserable hypocritical lot we are. Thinking this I boycotted the viewing of television for the day, and instead read Benazir’s, “Daughter of the East” for the second time since 1989.

After all, hers was a legend (no matter how controversial) born in the struggle, passion and love of the common man on the streets, and not in the seasonal studios of television talk shows and Facebook pages.

@dawn

anyone who has gone through such life, should understand why bitterness !! surely its hard to be the odd one in the land of pure.
 
.
Many of us carried these memories well in to the 1990s, when we joined different fields as young adults. During the tumultuous “decade of democracy” in which Benazir’s PPP and Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N became tools in the hands of the official desk-top jihadis (such as former ISI big-wigs), background military maneuvers and their religious and industrialist lackeys, my generation of Benazir sympathizers became awkward PPP apologists.

Primary reason why i will never vote for PPP and its team , they got played so easily despite the people who voted and supported them all these years ... they wasted peoples sacrifices
 
.
It explains Nadeem Paracha's hard attitude against Zia and obvious bitterness in his articles. But he is still one of the few 'liberal' writers I have a great appreciation for and the only one who shows the logic in their views.
 
.
Here is another good and balanced piece of analysis from same NFP on NS/PMLN current political stance in the country...both these analysis forced me to re-evaluate my thoughts about the author in general as someones fix him with a title as "Liberal fascist" alone.


Smokers’ Corner: Out in a flux

I have developed a distant liking for what PML-N chief Mian Nawaz Sharif has been standing for ever since his return from exile in 2007. In fact, I wonder, how can any democrat not agree with Sharif’s concerns regarding the military’s traditional interference in politics; or that Pakistan needs to not only strike serious peaceful postures with its neighbours, especially India, but we should also be willing to first concede our own follies before pointing fingers at outside forces for our ills.

Such are the thoughts that have made Sharif an ironic case of repulsion for the military establishment. It is ironic because this is the same man who, from 1985 till 1997, was considered the establishment’s most trusted and propped-up horse – until his second government was toppled in a military coup in 1999. Gone are the days when he was ever-willing to play the role of the the establishment’s civilian hit man, armed to keep ‘traitors’ like the PPP at bay and make sure that Punjab remains a bastion of establishmentarian maneuvers.

Sharif has been talking lately of his distaste for military regimes and interference, and his desire to construct strong economic ties with India, however, it does not mean that this is also his party’s stance. Just like any mainstream party anywhere in the world, the PML-N too has developed internal wings holding different opinions on various issues. For example, though the British Labour Party or the American Democratic Party are left-leaning, they have leftist, centrist and rightist tendencies within their folds.

The same is the case with the left-leaning PPP. Ever since its inception it too has had these three wings working within the party’s larger ideological framework. For example, just like the American Republican Party, the PML-N too has evolved into a democratic conservative outfit with a dedicated right-wing and (comparatively speaking) a more progressive wing. So if one keeps Sharif’s concerns in mind, it won’t be bizarre to suggest that it is this once hearty chum of the establishment who is now representing the progressive wing of the PML-N.

But it is still to be seen how much clout Nawaz and his band of men in the PML-N have compared to the loud wallop and numbers enjoyed by the party’s right-wing (Shahbaz Sharif, Saad Rafique, Ahsan Iqbal, etc.). Though it is normal for any big political party to entertain within itself various degrees of discourse of its central ideology, it is now becoming clear that this phenomenon has created a flux in the PML-N.

At the party’s recent rally in Faisalabad, one could clearly see not all PML-N men were on the same page. PML-N’s right-wing wants its chief and his supporters within the party to tone down their anti-establishment rhetoric and concentrate more on bringing down the Zardari regime through civil disobedience. Sharif’s group however is comparatively reluctant because it feels that the fall of an elected government through such a movement may pave the way for direct military intervention and the complete sidelining of the PML-N.

Then there’s the Imran Khan factor. Sharif’s group insists that Khan is being propped up by the establishment (to dent the PML-N vote bank) but at the same time it is still unsure how exactly to tackle the Khan card; whereas the right-wing of PML-N believes that Khan can be trumped only by attracting the anti-Zardari vote through street agitation.

But if Khan’s PTI is a blob of rhetorical contradictions in which its leader jumps from being a macho anti-drone/ US/ corruption crusader to becoming a rather lily-livered backfoot punter when it comes to airing views about religious extremism, PML-N too is not sounding all that coherent. Whereas parties like the PPP have managed to rein in its diverse internal wings on a single platform on most issues, PML-N seems to have got into an awkward tangle.

For instance, during the Faisalabad rally when Chaudhry Nisar Ali spoke about downing a ‘pharaoh’, one wasn’t sure whether he was talking about downing Zardari, Imran or the ISI. The party’s right-wing likes to downplay the party’s near-panic status in the sudden wake of Khan’s arrival as a third force in Punjab. But dented by the economic and political failures of the PML-N Punjab government (mirroring the sloppiness of the PPP regime at the centre), the party just can’t help but end up exhibiting the fright it is trying to conceal.

That’s why PML-N’s Faisalabad rally seemed more like a plea than a boast. It was a plea to its electorate to stay with the PML-N because Khan’s rise was artificial and supposedly many of the economic failings of PML-N’s government in Punjab are due to the ‘corruption’ of the federal government. This is making PML-N sound desperate. The only person that seems to be in the clear in this regard is Nawaz Sharif who is willing to seize a single line of action and thought, even willing to hold his horses till the next elections (late 2012/ early 2013).

But his influence within the party is being overridden by the right-wing hawks who are bent on finding a more boisterous way in the streets to push an elected government out of office. Clearly, these hawks, overtly stung by mischievous media taunts, Imran’s entry into the mainstream and the economic failure of the party’s government in Punjab, have become desperate and incoherent about what they stand for.

The only way I see PML-N regaining any lost ground in Punjab is by formulating a more coherent strategy, squarely revolving around Nawaz’s more patient and consistent disposition, focusing more on the long-term ‘enemy’ (the establishment’s maneuvering), rather than on a short-term goal of toppling an elected government.
Smokers
 
.
Here is another good and balanced piece of analysis from same NFP on NS/PMLN current political stance in the country...both these analysis forced me to re-evaluate my thoughts about the author in general as someones fix him with a title as "Liberal fascist" alone.


Smokers’ Corner: Out in a flux

I have developed a distant liking for what PML-N chief Mian Nawaz Sharif has been standing for ever since his return from exile in 2007. In fact, I wonder, how can any democrat not agree with Sharif’s concerns regarding the military’s traditional interference in politics; or that Pakistan needs to not only strike serious peaceful postures with its neighbours, especially India, but we should also be willing to first concede our own follies before pointing fingers at outside forces for our ills.

Such are the thoughts that have made Sharif an ironic case of repulsion for the military establishment. It is ironic because this is the same man who, from 1985 till 1997, was considered the establishment’s most trusted and propped-up horse – until his second government was toppled in a military coup in 1999. Gone are the days when he was ever-willing to play the role of the the establishment’s civilian hit man, armed to keep ‘traitors’ like the PPP at bay and make sure that Punjab remains a bastion of establishmentarian maneuvers.

Sharif has been talking lately of his distaste for military regimes and interference, and his desire to construct strong economic ties with India, however, it does not mean that this is also his party’s stance. Just like any mainstream party anywhere in the world, the PML-N too has developed internal wings holding different opinions on various issues. For example, though the British Labour Party or the American Democratic Party are left-leaning, they have leftist, centrist and rightist tendencies within their folds.

The same is the case with the left-leaning PPP. Ever since its inception it too has had these three wings working within the party’s larger ideological framework. For example, just like the American Republican Party, the PML-N too has evolved into a democratic conservative outfit with a dedicated right-wing and (comparatively speaking) a more progressive wing. So if one keeps Sharif’s concerns in mind, it won’t be bizarre to suggest that it is this once hearty chum of the establishment who is now representing the progressive wing of the PML-N.

But it is still to be seen how much clout Nawaz and his band of men in the PML-N have compared to the loud wallop and numbers enjoyed by the party’s right-wing (Shahbaz Sharif, Saad Rafique, Ahsan Iqbal, etc.). Though it is normal for any big political party to entertain within itself various degrees of discourse of its central ideology, it is now becoming clear that this phenomenon has created a flux in the PML-N.

At the party’s recent rally in Faisalabad, one could clearly see not all PML-N men were on the same page. PML-N’s right-wing wants its chief and his supporters within the party to tone down their anti-establishment rhetoric and concentrate more on bringing down the Zardari regime through civil disobedience. Sharif’s group however is comparatively reluctant because it feels that the fall of an elected government through such a movement may pave the way for direct military intervention and the complete sidelining of the PML-N.

Then there’s the Imran Khan factor. Sharif’s group insists that Khan is being propped up by the establishment (to dent the PML-N vote bank) but at the same time it is still unsure how exactly to tackle the Khan card; whereas the right-wing of PML-N believes that Khan can be trumped only by attracting the anti-Zardari vote through street agitation.

But if Khan’s PTI is a blob of rhetorical contradictions in which its leader jumps from being a macho anti-drone/ US/ corruption crusader to becoming a rather lily-livered backfoot punter when it comes to airing views about religious extremism, PML-N too is not sounding all that coherent. Whereas parties like the PPP have managed to rein in its diverse internal wings on a single platform on most issues, PML-N seems to have got into an awkward tangle.

For instance, during the Faisalabad rally when Chaudhry Nisar Ali spoke about downing a ‘pharaoh’, one wasn’t sure whether he was talking about downing Zardari, Imran or the ISI. The party’s right-wing likes to downplay the party’s near-panic status in the sudden wake of Khan’s arrival as a third force in Punjab. But dented by the economic and political failures of the PML-N Punjab government (mirroring the sloppiness of the PPP regime at the centre), the party just can’t help but end up exhibiting the fright it is trying to conceal.

That’s why PML-N’s Faisalabad rally seemed more like a plea than a boast. It was a plea to its electorate to stay with the PML-N because Khan’s rise was artificial and supposedly many of the economic failings of PML-N’s government in Punjab are due to the ‘corruption’ of the federal government. This is making PML-N sound desperate. The only person that seems to be in the clear in this regard is Nawaz Sharif who is willing to seize a single line of action and thought, even willing to hold his horses till the next elections (late 2012/ early 2013).

But his influence within the party is being overridden by the right-wing hawks who are bent on finding a more boisterous way in the streets to push an elected government out of office. Clearly, these hawks, overtly stung by mischievous media taunts, Imran’s entry into the mainstream and the economic failure of the party’s government in Punjab, have become desperate and incoherent about what they stand for.

The only way I see PML-N regaining any lost ground in Punjab is by formulating a more coherent strategy, squarely revolving around Nawaz’s more patient and consistent disposition, focusing more on the long-term ‘enemy’ (the establishment’s maneuvering), rather than on a short-term goal of toppling an elected government.
Smokers


I strongly disagree with Paracha in this article. He has fallen prey to the view that many so-called liberals take, supporting Nawaz now that he is strongly anti-Army. They see anyone against the Army as right, and I had hoped Paracha wouldn't take that line, as well. Nawaz has a personal vendetta against the Army ever since Musharraf's 1999 takeover, and that is why he is so anti-Army. It is good to see the Imran's popularity is endangering his own vote bank in Punjab. That brings me to one other point about Paracha. As one writer wrote once, he's made a career out of lynching Imran Khan, and often, like he does with Zia, seems to take extra time to mock or ridicule Imran.
 
.
Primary reason why i will never vote for PPP and its team , they got played so easily despite the people who voted and supported them all these years ... they wasted peoples sacrifices

well PPP was better in ideology, and both of these parties bad in governance, hence failed democracy...


 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It explains Nadeem Paracha's hard attitude against Zia and obvious bitterness in his articles. But he is still one of the few 'liberal' writers I have a great appreciation for and the only one who shows the logic in their views.

Are you sure you are talking about Nadeem Paracha? Logic and all that!!!
 
.
I strongly disagree with Paracha in this article. He has fallen prey to the view that many so-called liberals take, supporting Nawaz now that he is strongly anti-Army. They see anyone against the Army as right, and I had hoped Paracha wouldn't take that line, as well. Nawaz has a personal vendetta against the Army ever since Musharraf's 1999 takeover, and that is why he is so anti-Army. It is good to see the Imran's popularity is endangering his own vote bank in Punjab. That brings me to one other point about Paracha. As one writer wrote once, he's made a career out of lynching Imran Khan, and often, like he does with Zia, seems to take extra time to mock or ridicule Imran.

there is no point in trusting Nawaz sharif. he has been given chances, he failed, now I see Nawaz people on tv saying we are human not angels, we have made mistakes, implying that now we have changed.
For goodness sake, Nawaz group didnot make mistakes, they made blunders !!
and the reality is if God forbid Nawaz group be somehow able to make government, they will prove a thousand times fragile than PPP. who is going to stand by Nawaz(even if he is true, and not holding a personal grudge against military) when Establishment is going to twist its corrupt, immoral and soldout candidates ??

> anyone can make a career by ridiculing PTI and its so called fb supporters blaming them for being impolite. although the stuff they write is usually of low quality and poor informed.
 
.
Are you sure you are talking about Nadeem Paracha? Logic and all that!!!

Ya…but that’s only until “they” read his 2nd column “Out in a Flux”.
It’s easy to call others hypocrites...!!!
 
.
well PPP was better in ideology, and both of these parties bad in governance, hence failed democracy...



Yes course they were thats why they are the biggest party also have a mix of people from different sects and back grounds. They were huge in karachi at one point later to be rejected by the people as many sacrificed for PPP in zia's era , i personally know many who went through shittiest time we can imagine but later when BB called talibans her kids instead of condemning the stupidity displayed by establishment over the years thats when anti BB sentiment started brewing in urban sindh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Are you sure you are talking about Nadeem Paracha? Logic and all that!!!

Ya…but that’s only until “they” read his 2nd column “Out in a Flux”.
It’s easy to call others hypocrites...!!!


Yes, I do think that Nadeem Paracha gives a more logical explanation for his views as compared to, say, Ayesha Siddiqa, whose only response is, I'm a liberal secularist and Pakistan Army is responsible for all the ills in the world (or something to that effect).
I had already read this article actually, but I was pointing out what I think are his two greatest flaws as a writer. Otherwise, there are many other things I disagree with him on.
 
.
Benazir worked with Indian Intelligence Agencies to kill General Zia and in return she cracked down on the Khalistan Freedom Movement.


I dont want to say anything bad about a dead women, but she should've just stayed out of politics.
 
.
Benazir worked with Indian Intelligence Agencies to kill General Zia and in return she cracked down on the Khalistan Freedom Movement.


I dont want to say anything bad about a dead women, but she should've just stayed out of politics.


Someone had to avenge her father. Zia was my distant relative, and he's not as bad as people make him out to be. Just cheap publicity shots at a dead man who made some mistakes.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom