Why in the world would the cyclist say anything false? what possible gain or loss does he have to gain. In addition , The video is proof enough that there was a bombing against a bus and NOT some lone cyclist on an adventure that no one really knew or cared about. The story was quite likely planted as the levies dying protecting the white foreign man is much more PR positive than them dying for pithy local pilgrims.
Even if we give the benefit of doubt to the levies and say that the attacked party was acting as forward recce for the cyclist security detail, then perhaps it makes sense.
Even if we give the benefit of doubt to the levies and say that the attacked party was acting as forward recce for the cyclist security detail, then perhaps it makes sense.