What's new

South China Sea Forum

promoting...not crying

I think the 10 ASEAN countries should unite under the Vietnamese banner. What is better: Chinese or Vietnamese rule over SE Asia? The latter is better, for sure.

:cheers:

You do realize that Vietnam is the lowest performer among ASEAN major 6 ;)
 
.
You are funny. I think you troll a bit.

Vietnam literally means Viet living in the south (nam=south). Why south? Because Vietnam lies south of China. What else?

haha,yes nam=south. but it seems you don't really know the meaning of viet.before your country got the name vietnam ,viet didn't refer to vietnam or vietnamnese.
btw, do you know how and when did your country god the name vietnam?
 
.
I hope you Indonesia wake up, along with Malaysia.

It is just obvious that China continues a policy of intimidation: first Vietnam and Phillippines, now Malaysia. Indonesia and Brunei will be the next ones. To think otherwise is just native.
Yes our policy is intimidation. If you try to challenge us then our policy is crush you with tanks!
 
.
A cockroach will not die until you kill it. You are just deluding yourself like a weakling. A war to finish Vietnam and make them serve our interests is inevitable.
You are too young too simple. Wars cannot solve every problem, or US has long conquered the world. Every war must has clear purpose and can bring us much bigger benefits than costs. It would be a waste of energy and money to fight a large scale war against Vietnam or Philippines. They will for sure bow to us actively when we become strong enough that no power could parallel us in this area.
 
.
You are too young too simple. Wars cannot solve every problem, or US has long conquered the world. Every war must has clear purpose and can bring us much bigger benefits than costs. It would be a waste of energy and money to fight a large scale war against Vietnam or Philippines. They will for sure bow to us actively when we become strong enough that no power could parallel us in this area.
You must be a coward at heart to think they are so cowardly. You need to inflict 10% casualties before they will bow. Brave countries you must inflict 20% casualties! All problems can be solved by inflicting massive casualties on enemies. Only cowards delude themselves otherwise.
 
.
@HongWu
what is the meaning of your name and where are your from?please tell me in Chinese:china:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
You must be a coward at heart to think they are so cowardly. You need to inflict 10% casualties before they will bow. Brave countries you must inflict 20% casualties! All problems can be solved by inflicting massive casualties on enemies. Only cowards delude themselves otherwise.

It is quite easy to defeat Viet but always more difficult to recover the order and peace. See what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan, we really don't want to see one of our neighbors become a source of turmoil and terrorism. That does not match our interests. And suggest you restrain your meaningless,aggressive words again, or I'll really doubt if you are true Chinese.
 
. .
the Promised Land - in the Bible: Canaan, the land promised by God to Abraham and his descendants; Gen. 12:7

Under Đại Việt (大越 "Great Viet"), all Southeast Asians would enjoy prosperity and security under protection of Vietnam. Any single nation in the region is too small if it stands alone. United, we will change the history. Dai Viet= a promised land.



I know you are against the idea. But who cares?

Appreciate your confidence from nowhere, just like North Koreans. Dai Viet? Even Dai(大)is a Chinese word. Invent your own language before your dreams! BTW, I have to admit that Viets never lack the sense of humor and never mind making themselves a big joke to please others. That is respectful.
 
.
haha,yes nam=south. but it seems you don't really know the meaning of viet.before your country got the name vietnam ,viet didn't refer to vietnam or vietnamnese.
btw, do you know how and when did your country god the name vietnam?
LOL...are we now in a history teaching class?

Vietnam has many names in the long history, more than 2 dozens. The term "Việt" is cognate with the Chinese word "Yue", a name applied in ancient times to various non-Chinese groups who lived in what is now southern China and northern Vietnam.


2879–2524 BC Xích Quỷ
2524–258 BC Văn Lang
257–207 BC Âu Lạc
207–111 BC Nam Việt
111 BC–39 AD Giao Chỉ
40–43 Lĩnh Nam
43–299 Giao Chỉ
299–544 Giao Châu
544–602 Vạn Xuân
602–679 Giao Châu
679–757 An Nam
757–766 Trấn Nam
766–866 An Nam
866–967 Tĩnh Hải quân
968–1054 Đại Cồ Việt
1054–1400 Đại Việt
1400–1407 Đại Ngu
1407–1427 Giao Chỉ
1428–1804 Đại Việt
1804–1839 Việt Nam
1839–1887 Đại Nam
1887–1945 French Indochina (Tonkin, Annam, & Cochinchina)
from 1945 Việt Nam



Actually at the beginning of 1800 century the Nguyen Emperor wanted to name the country as "Nam Viet", but China opposed it because it feared Vietnam could claim South of China.


728px-Nam-Viet_200bc.jpg

Nam-Viet 200bc
 
.
China will not be passive in sea disputes


Global Times | 2013-3-29 0:03:01

logo.jpg



Chinese naval fleets recently conducted patrols on the South China Sea, reaching as far as Zengmu Reef, the southernmost part of Chinese territory. In an oath-taking ceremony on board Tuesday, the troops and officials vowed to safeguard China's sovereignty.

Earlier this month, a Chinese vessel fired two warning signal shells into the sky to prevent illegal fishing operations by Vietnamese fishermen. Both showed China's firm determination to insist upon its stance amid the South China Sea disputes.

Washington expressed its concerns in both cases, reinforcing its attitude that the US can interfere in the South China Sea issue any time.

Despite the fact that John Kerry, the new US secretary of state, has stepped into office and some side effects brought by his predecessor's aggressive approach are in decline, the US stance on the South China Sea will not fundamentally change. Behind China's frictions with the Philippines and Vietnam is actually the rivalry between Beijing and Washington over the South China Sea.

After Hillary Clinton's four-year intervention into the South China Sea issue with her "smart power" diplomacy, and Manila and Hanoi's frictions with Beijing, all kinds of risks within the South China Sea issue have become evident. All parties involved now have a clearer understanding of each other's national strength and determination.

China, through powerful countermeasures against Manila and Hanoi's provocations, has changed its passive status. Beijing had been worried that frictions on the South China Sea would cause deterioration in its surrounding environment and thus undermine its period of strategic opportunities. Now most of its concerns have been dispelled.

Crises like the Huangyan Island standoff have made one thing explicit - those were, after all, conflicts between countries whose strength were unequally matched. Manila and Hanoi would not have any chance of victory if the South China Sea issue escalated into a confrontation of national strength.

China has no plan to wage a war and recover all the islands illegally occupied by the Philippines and Vietnam. However, China has become more resolute in terms of strikes against the two's provocations.

China's growing leverage over the South China Sea issue stems from stable domestic development. Meanwhile, Manila and Hanoi are witnessing a reduced ability to provoke Beijing over those disputes. Washington is also seeing an increasing number of restraints in its South China Sea policy. The Philippines and Vietnam would face more troubles if they choose to seek fierce confrontation with China.

China should focus on peaceful development. But meanwhile, it is not afraid of adopting resolute measures to protect core national interests. China should avoid external misjudgments toward it, which is pivotal to the nation's long-term strategic environment.


China will not be passive in sea disputes - Frontpage - OP-ED - Globaltimes.cn
 
. . .
I believe China is becoming a clown nation. The PLA stages endless military exercises in the East and South China Sea, and its media posts endless hate speeches against neighbors. Recently China´s navy even shot at a Vietnamese fishing vessel and conducted landing maneuver near Malaysia coast.

However they love to play the victim card, accusing Vietnam, Philippines and others of provocations. I´m afraid that Chinese military leaders vow to copy N. Korea style of provocation, turning the entire region into a battle field.

Mr Xi, where are you?

PS: for anyone, who is not aware: Global Times is the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China. :tdown:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom