cochine
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2015
- Messages
- 2,052
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
LOL Kublai is foreigner but first thai king and many of viet kings are locals, wow the viet propaganda is strong LOL. Do you even know that Tang emperors claim the title khagan of heaven (天可汗) after they defeated the Turkic hordes? So is it china have the claim on all Turkic nations now eh?
Yuan was supreme over the other khanates? LOL! Kublai never control any of the others khanates, the mongol empire already gone when it fractured to 4 parts, and they are independent from each other. Otherwise, applying your logic, you viets are rule by china until the French came colonize you guys, because lots of viet kings are Chinese origin.
Your double standard really showing man, what difference between the history of china, Thailand and Vietnam rule by localized dynasty of foreign origin? Internal matter LOL, then yuan is also internal matter of china, and Kublai is a Mongolian ethnic Chinese. Kublai too have to identify himself as Chinese before he can claim the mandate of heaven and rule as a Chinese emperor.
And don't DODGE MY QUESTION ABOUT BRITISH MONARCH AND ANY TREATY STATED SCS ISLANDS BELONG TO VIETNAM, oh you cant, because all you have is just double standard POV and crappy history knowledge. So applying your logic, Britain is ruled by germans for centuries (so is viets because they colonize by french), and Vietnam is currently illegally occupying SCS islands because I do not recall any treaty stated SCS belongs to Vietnam.
LOL names doesn't implying ownership, Ming name SCS as cochine "ocean" is simply for ease to remember, not to mention Vietnam is rule by Ming China for decades before Ming pull out and grant viets limited freedom, albeit Vietnam is still a vassal state of china. To give you an example, the name new Zealand (Zeeland) originated from netherland, but british monarch is currently the head of state. While NZ is a part of british commonwealth, UK, Canada and Australia does not own new Zealand.
The most important point of san Francisco conference is, china did not participate this conference hence all "voting" results from this conference regarding china are illegal and will not be recognize by china. China will only recognize conference that china had participated. This san Francisco conference is just basically an earlier version of the SCS arbitration from just a while ago, illegal and nonsense.
Apply your logic, new President of Taiwan is fractured from former KMT policy, has claimed that she is Taiwanese and so she has right to claim that Taiwan is independent state, not related to mainland China. Do you like it ?