Sniper takes out ISIS executioner from a mile away

[f1000n]

When it comes to BS, the British take the prize. I remember a claim that a Challenge took like 70 RPG hits and not a single one managed to even blow the tracks off or disable the tank. The Battle of Britain was also vastly exaggerated.

These stories are common, next it will be, 3 SAS commandos ambush 1000 Isis fighters by beheading them. Then the SAS commandos shoot down an ISIS helicopter with an explosive bow--Rambo style.

This is another one. There's no SAS in/around Fallujah and there wasn't during that OP. Yes i'll be told it's classified etc. But nothing stays classified in Iraq and Syria during daylight with local troops, they'll film it like the 'New Syrian Army' photographed SAS troops in Syria on their side.


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/sas-hero-t...ists-armed-only-gurkha-knife-fallujah-1568888

SAS soldier takes out 3 Isis jihadists 'armed only with Gurkha knife' in Fallujah

One SAS source told the Daily Star on Sunday: "As soon as his ammunition was expended, the IS gunmen tried to storm him. As they went to grab him he unsheathed his kukri and began slashing away.

"He decapitated the first gunman, slit the throat of second and killed another with a third blow. He then sliced away at three others. The IS gunmen fled in panic allowing the SAS soldier to carry the injured men to safety."

 

[hussain0216]

Then you must be fired up, huh chief ?



And you say you hate them yet you buy their black market oil , trade with them and allow fighters in through your border. Lol.

You had the same bull plop during Vietnam, Iraqi occupation, Afghan occupation

It goes like this
Were winning
Were winning
Were winning
Ok everything is a mess and were pulling out

The British were terrible in helmand and they were terrible in and around Basra

This is just mindless propaganda for idiots who will bark and clap like circus seals

 

[boomslang]

...The British were terrible in helmand and they were terrible in and around Basra...

And the pakistanis were great at.......Oh, that's right. They were NEVER great at anything, except hiding Bin Laden ( for a while, anyway) and supporting the taliban. Way to go, pakistan !!

 

[hussain0216]

And the pakistanis were great at.......Oh, that's right. They were NEVER great at anything, except hiding Bin Laden ( for a while, anyway) and supporting the taliban. Way to go, pakistan !!

Supporting Bin Laden and the Taliban/Mujahadeen? Sounds like something that the U.S would do

 

[ptldM3]

Did not Russians invent the genre with Vasily Zaitsev.
How many of his alleged killings were just propaganda?
Did he ever kill a single individual?

Battle of Britain exaggerated? Strategic WIN, since the result was that Britain was not invaded.
Without Britain surviving, it is highly likely that the US would not have gone to war with Germany,
and without US support, you would now be speaking German or more likely, would not have been conceived.

He worked with spotters and other snipers, all or most of his kills can be confirmed. He also received the Hero of the Soviet Union which is very difficult to get. The Germans were in on the Soviet propoganda too because thousands of Germans had the back their heads blown off and they many Germans have testified to the losses they took to Soviet snipers.


Back to topic, go look at the amount of kills the British claimed in the Battle of Britain and the amount aircraft the Germans actual used.

Or continue believing that British tanks can take 70 RPG hits and return without a scratch or that an SAS commando slit the throats of many Isis with a machete or all the other BS.

Next month an SAS commando will roundhouse kick a member of ISIS, cause his head to explode, which in turn will cause the death of 20 other Isis members from the meat shrapnel.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

He worked with spotters and other snipers, all or most of his kills can be confirmed. He also received the Hero of the Soviet Union which is very difficult to get. The Germans were in on the Soviet propoganda too because thousands of Germans had the back their heads blown off and they many Germans have testified to the losses they took to Soviet snipers.


Back to topic, go look at the amount of kills the British claimed in the Battle of Britain and the amount aircraft the Germans actual used.

Or continue believing that British tanks can take 70 RPG hits and return without a scratch or that an SAS commando slit the throats of many Isis with a machete or all the other BS.

Next month an SAS commando will roundhouse kick a member of ISIS, cause his head to explode, which in turn will cause the death of 20 other Isis members from the meat shrapnel.

That is what the Soviet Army may have fabricated.
Not proof that there was not a large number of Soviet troops that each managed to kill a few Germans,
and then they selected someone which hero status was the creation of an ambitious press officer.

The number of kills in fighter duels are almost always exaggerated, vs the number o planes lost.
The Germans shot down more British fighters than vice versa, but each German fighter lost
was a pilot lost, while a British plane lost, did not necessarily lose them a pilot.
Britain won, because the Germans abandoned their invasion plans.
That was a Strategic Win, which cannot be denied. Claims are unimportant.

There has not been any evidence provided that the Brits lost a single Challenger II.
I would not be surprised if all Brit casualties are pretty well documented.
Show any proof of losses...
The US lost a handful of Abrams, and pictures have bern provided.
Until You can show any proof, your comments are just hot air.

I don't doubt SAS will kill even more, using just a thumb and no other weapons.

Supporting Bin Laden and the Taliban/Mujahadeen? Sounds like something that the U.S would do

Supporting Bin Laden and/or the Taliban is what Pakistan has been doing for almost 25 years.

 

[Areesh]

Supporting Bin Laden and/or the Taliban is what Pakistan has been doing for almost 25 years.

But we never made a movie glorifying them.

https://twitter.com/x/status/775723229902020608

 

[waz]

Sniper takes out ISIS executioner from a mile away
Published September 12, 2016
New York Post

This image posted on a militant website in 2014 shows fighters from ISIS group, marching in Raqqa, Syria. (AP Photo)

A sharpshooter killed a top ISIS executioner and three other jihadists with a single bullet from nearly a mile away -- just seconds before the fiend was set to burn 12 hostages alive with a flamethrower, according to a new report.

The British Special Air Service marksman turned one of the most hated terrorists in Syria into a fireball by using a Barett .50-caliber rifle to strike a fuel tank affixed to the jihadi’s back, the UK’s Daily Star reported Sunday.

The pack exploded, killing the sadistic terrorist and three of his flunkies, who were supposed to film the execution, last month, the paper said.

The ISIS butcher -- who reportedly delighted in burning hostages alive -- had been on a US “kill list” for several months, sources told the paper, which did not identify the sniper or the executioner.

Click to read the story in the New York Post.



NICE SHOOTING to the Brits !! Gotta love the Barrett .50.

Yes, shoot those ba*tards till their heads roll in the sand. Well done done to our boy.

 

[f1000n]

Yes, shoot those ba*tards till their heads roll in the sand. Well done done to our boy.

its fake

 

[waz]

its fake

According to you.

 

[f1000n]

According to you.

Following this war daily for years I would like to think that for me and any sane person it's not that hard to spot and filter BS from real news.

Here's another fabricated SAS Gurkha superhero story from not too long ago.


SAS soldier takes out 3 Isis jihadists 'armed only with Gurkha knife' in Fallujah

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/sas-hero-t...ists-armed-only-gurkha-knife-fallujah-1568888

And then there's another one, 4 Jihadis with 1 bullet. The gulibble all fall for it.

Hero SAS sniper saves hostages by killing four ISIS jihadis with just ONE bullet

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...r-saves-hostages-isis-jihadis-just-one-bullet

SAS weren't and still aren't present around Fallujah. 4 Jihadis with 1 bullet is utter nonsense especially when all the other 3 stories point out a similar exceptional heroic situation like slicing 3 with a gurkha knife and saving hostages right before execution. This makes me question other SAS stories.

So how does this even reach the news? Is some SAS sniper contacting the news agencies and telling them his story, is HQ that much interested in pointing out how their SF units are present on the ground whilst they keep it secret. It's more likely that the news agency is making up news from nowhere to gain views, I can't believe you actually fall for it.