What's new

Sirji, Sarabjeet or Surjeet ?...

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
Sirji, Sarabjeet or Surjeet? – The Express Tribune


Sometimes, the news makes you shake your head in despair. It’s not because of its grim nature — we are, by now, sufficiently trained to understand that tidings of comfort and joy steer newswheel only occassionally. No, sometimes you shake your head in despair at the stupidity of the news source.

On June 26, via a gargantuan clerical error, the office of the president of Pakistan brought upon itself what this newspaper described as “international embarrassment”. It began with the news that death row prisoner Sarabjeet Singh — convicted terrorist and spy to Pakistan but innocent drunk farmer to India — had been pardoned by President Asif Ali Zardari. His death sentence now commuted to life imprisonment, he was also eligible for release since he had served 22 years in prison.

In Pakistan, the Jamaat-e-Islami was outraged. It called the government weak and invoked Islamic law to say that Sarabjeet could only be pardoned by the families of his 14 victims.

In India, the news networks were euphoric about this story. There were scenes of Sarabjeet’s family distributing sweets, commendations to the Zardari government, reports of the Indian foreign minister thanking President Zardari and so on. But they were ecstatic about another development. This was the interrogation of Abu Jandal, deported from Saudi Arabia last week, allegedly a key player in the November 26 terror attacks in Mumbai. Jandal, an Indian from Maharashtra, apparently taught the Mumbai gunmen Hindi and had first-hand knowledge of how the ISI directed the operation from a control room in Karachi. He was in Saudi Arabia on a Pakistani passport — plans for the next attack were being finalised in Riyadh and would have been directed from there, it was reported.

These two stories played out side by side through most of the day. To my bemusement, I must admit, the Pakistani state was being threatened with exposure (for the thousandth time) and instead of the standard ‘show us the proof’, it chose to give its accuser a pleasant surprise. It didn’t add up.

At night, we were told that it wasn’t the math that had led to the problem, it was the spelling. It wasn’t Sarabjeet who had been pardoned, it was Surjeet (or Sarjeet, as some papers have it). His death sentence had been commuted in 1989 and he, too, had already served more than a life term. The president’s spokesman, Farhatullah Babar, clarified that President Zardari had not pardoned anybody. Sarabjeet’s death sentence, therefore, stands.

The belief that the Pakistani state is malign and unreliable has been cemented in the average Indian’s mind over the last two decades. It will be difficult to convince Indians that a turnaround such as this is just a matter of poor spelling. Sarabjeet’s case has received too much attention since he was sentenced to death. A hundred thousand Indians put their signatures on his plea for mercy. It comes up frequently in bilateral talks. One cannot afford a clerical mistake here and trying to hide behind one only makes Pakistan look even less trustworthy. This is what the pardon that wasn’t end up doing.

But let’s set aside what’s happening in the news-consuming Indian’s head and look at what was happening in the higher reaches of the Indian government through June 26. The foreign ministers of the two countries were supposed to meet in mid-July but the Indian foreign ministry announced a postponement (with no new dates proposed). The official reason is a clash of dates with the Indian presidential elections on July 19. In the background, there are two other factors: a different prime minister in Pakistan and the recent ‘prize catch’, Abu Jandal.

In Pakistan, a fragile government, struggling as it is against the judiciary, had to deal with the reaction of the extremists and the army — both of which oppose any show of clemency towards Sarabjeet.

The postponement of the foreign minister talks came during the course of the working day. The confusion over Sarabjeet was cleared up only around midnight. It was at that time, once the spelling was corrected, that the math added up.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 28th, 2012.
 
. . . .
Well you indians have to look no further then the clown pictured below. Now that was a real embarrassment for Pakistan, and indians too if that is that they feel embarrassed at all at the first place.

jdqo7xeiaic.jpg


Had he kept his mouth shut, may be just may be zardari wouldnt have had to deal with such a hard mess releasing this other clown.
 
.
We should have killed him instead of letting him go... This is what Land Of Gandhi people did to our innocent fishermen a couple years back.
 
.
We should have killed him instead of letting him go... This is what Land Of Gandhi people did to our innocent fishermen a couple years back.

i dont know why you are referring to Gandhi in your post. any thing that involves violance is not welcomed by people of the either side. do not link that to Gandhi or Jihna or any one else.
Blame it on the people who did it.
 
.
i dont know why you are referring to Gandhi in your post. any thing that involves violance is not welcomed by people of the either side. do not link that to Gandhi or Jihna or any one else.
Blame it on the people who did it.

I said Land of Gandhi to showthat India loves violence, that's why they sent one of their agents to kill 14 of us for no reason.
 
. .
how about the 166 that your agency claimed in the MUMBAI attack
and you don't have single proof for past three years you are crying in the whole world without bringing any solid proof in front of people even India never released pictures of other 9 people who were involved in Mumbai attacks and now being proven your own citizens were involved and still trying to blame Pakistan first stop things like Guhrat riots from happening and what you are doing in Kashmir only than you can avoid such attacks and as far agents are concerned every agent caught and proven guilty should be hanged on Wagah border to make him an example for those people who want to spent spies in Pakistan
 
.
It a shame that Pakistan was ready release one person and they change stance after getting warning from terrorist organizations. It made the news in the international headlines and all main stream Pakistani media criticized it in their editorials.
 
. .
It a shame that Pakistan was ready release one person and they change stance after getting warning from terrorist organizations. It made the news in the international headlines and all main stream Pakistani media criticized it in their editorials.
Sir wake up Pakistan just released the prisoner and he has entered your country only an hour ago you really need to get your self updated his name is Surjeet Singh and he was in prison longer than Sarbajeet the terrorist
 
.
Had he kept his mouth shut, may be just may be zardari wouldnt have had to deal with such a hard mess releasing this other clown.

In all fairness this is correct.

The issue at hand is not so much of release or not of Sarabjeet Singh but the blunder on part of the presidential spokesman who took his name .

Five hours later GOP amended the name to a man for whom a Presidential pardon was not needed in the first place. He was not on death row , his sentence had finished and was due to return anyway albiet 5-6 years late.

It is these & similar events that give rise to suspicion which as will be agreed is not misplaced.

The man is in Pak prision, hang him if it so felt. But do not vaccilate.

This undoes a lot of good ppl on both sides have done painstakily for so long.
 
.
Well hey what!!!

Surjeet Singh after going to India also admits that he was a spy!!!

Maybe he just didn't have anything credible and worthwhile !!

We shouldn't be letting spies go unless for a prisoner exchange.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom