What's new

Singapore sanctions Russia over 'unprovoked attack' on Ukraine

If so, as I said, I want to sell you a bridge, I take instalment payment, you can own it and use it immediately.

Dude, in case you still have not notice, you are claiming I am wrong ON MY OWN OPINION....
Hong kong ranks first in almost all global city rankings when it comes to financial hubs in Asia, Hong kong won't lose its top financial hub position just because what you say or where you invest, Hong kong never lacks investors around the world.

微信图片_20220305220332.png
 
.
No, it isn't. You know why Hong Kong is and always will be the world's premier financial hub? Because of its geographic and legal proximity to China.

Where you choose to invest doesn't determine whether or not Hong Kong in the financial hub.
True, so does those "ranking" does not determine whether or not Hong Kong is THE financial hub.
 
.
Where you choose to invest doesn't determine whether or not Hong Kong in the financial hub.
Someone believe it does, lol...

True, so does those "ranking" does not determine whether or not Hong Kong is THE financial hub.
Based on the most studies and researches, Hong kong is the top financial hub in Asia. You may say not everyone agrees, sure, some people still think the earth is flat, I m talking about the general consensus.
 
.
@LeGenD is it possible for you to come here and clean this thread up. Apparently if I don't believe in something I must be a clown....Dude and Dudette here need to keep their emotion in check.......

Someone believe it does, lol...


Based on the most studies and researches, Hong kong is the top financial hub in Asia. You may say not everyone agrees, sure, some people still think the earth is flat, I m talking about the general consensus.
What research and what studied? What is the evident that back that ranking? Is it possible to show me the critical information that leads to the determination of "ranking"

Can you tell me that?
 
.
What research and what studied? What is the evident that back that ranking? Is it possible to show me the critical information that leads to the determination of "ranking"

Can you tell me that?
Ok, I'll try to search on the internet, can you tell me yours too? the one you claim Singapore being above Hong kong as Asian financial hub. Can you please?

The human capital factors summarize the availability of a skilled workforce, the flexibility of the labour market, the quality of the business education and the skill-set of the workforce, and quality of life. The business environment factors aggregate and value the regulation, tax rates, levels of corruption, economic freedom and how difficult in general it is to do business. To measure regulation an online questionnaire has been used. The financial sector development factors assess the volume and value of trading in capital markets and other financial markets, the cluster effect of the number of different financial service companies at the location, and employment and economic output indicators. The infrastructure factors account for the price and availability of office space at the location, as well as public transport. Reputation and general considers more subjective aspects such as innovation, brand appeal, cultural diversity and competitive positioning.
 
. .
Ok, I'll try to search on the internet, can you tell me yours too? the one you claim Singapore being above Hong kong as Asian financial hub.
First of all, as I said, I dont believe in ranking, I gather my own intelligence to invest.

But if you are into "ranking and article" here are one


A lot of those article is biased, that's why I don't believe in ANY OF THOSE.

But hey, if it make you sleep better......
 
Last edited:
.
@LeGenD is it possible for you to come here and clean this thread up. Apparently if I don't believe in something I must be a clown....Dude and Dudette here need to keep their emotion in check.......


What research and what studied? What is the evident that back that ranking? Is it possible to show me the critical information that leads to the determination of "ranking"

Can you tell me that?
I have removed some posts.
 
.
@jhungary
@Beast
@beijingwalker

Ceasefire please.

@jhungary

Other members did provide links which highlight Hong Kong as a financial hub. What is wrong with this?

As I said, I don't believe in most of the article, even article like this, saying Singapore financial center will be the biggest winner of the Hong Kong Draconian investment law


I did my own research before investment, I don't believe in any "Ranking" or "Article" because most of them are biased. When I answer that post, I don't say that as any ranking, all post I answer is my own opinion, and these two guys keep asking me to provide evidence on something I don't personally believe in. And then call me name for not believing the ranking just because they said so ....lol.
 
. .
To be fact, we are backing our words with professional institute ranking and data while this fellow just keep ranting and ranting non stop with his personal opinion and bias. And he can't prove anything credible with regards to financial opinion.

You know him long enough and you shall have known his trick well.
 
.
As I said, I don't believe in most of the article, even article like this, saying Singapore financial center will be the biggest winner of the Hong Kong Draconian investment law


I did my own research before investment, I don't believe in any "Ranking" or "Article" because most of them are biased.
I see.

You conveyed your perspective with a source which is fine. It is indicative of what might be the case in future.

Hong Kong is doing well in the present which is also fair point.

This argument can be dropped for now.

To be fact, we are backing our words with professional institute ranking and data while this fellow just keep ranting and ranting non stop with his personal opinion and bias. And he can't prove anything credible with regards to financial opinion.

You know him long enough and you shall have known his trick well.

Yes, I asked the same question and he responded to me with a source which informs his POV which is fine. See above.

I respect that.

I agree with you as well.

You both made your point.

My view is in following post:

 
.
I see.

You conveyed your perspective with a source which is fine. It is indicative of what might be the case in future.

Hong Kong is doing well in the present which is also fair point.

This argument can be dropped for now.



Yes, I asked the same question and he responded to me with a source which informs his POV which is fine. See above.

I respect that.

I agree with you as well.

You both made your point.

My view is in following post:

But then this is a problem now isn't it? Effectively I am quoting an article to destroy my own point (that I don't believe in any article) just to stay "valid" So either way I lost that argument.

It is supposed to be enough because what I said is my own opinion, this "proof" or not happening is getting old really fast. I mean, this is the exact reason why I try to stay off this forum in the first place.
 
. .
But then this is a problem now isn't it? Effectively I am quoting an article to destroy my own point (that I don't believe in any article) just to stay "valid" So either way I lost that argument.

It is supposed to be enough because what I said is my own opinion, this "proof" or not happening is getting old really fast. I mean, this is the exact reason why I try to stay off this forum in the first place.

I am not getting you in this post.


You disagree with this source?

I noticed your debate in this thread spiraling out of control and you requested my intervention. I am trying to help you out here.

Listen - you cannot settle an argument with every person on every single day on a forum and in real life (unrealistic). I cannot either. When another member posts a link while addressing your post - it should be checked and respected. You may disagree with provided information and counter it with evidence on your hand. This is how it works.

If it does not works - no problem. You conveyed your point and you may move on.

Therefore, relax.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom