What's new

Sikkim Standoff Can Be Resolved Diplomatically: India

.
that is the reason why I dont believe what Mr Bhamre said. he said bhutanese king yesterday gave a statement

My friend, these Indians are masters in spreading propaganda. Even they will produce a fake statement to prove their propaganda.
 
. .
We are masters in every thing we do. You keep following your masters' orders
following masters order sound like relationship between indian and bhutan.
even so we also asked bhutan,buhtan told us that they dont know anything before about indian cross bhutan board.

the bhutanese king should come out and make a public annoucement.
 
.
following masters order sound like relationship between indian and bhutan.
even so we also asked bhutan,buhtan told us that they dont know anything before about indian cross bhutan board.

the bhutanese king should come out and make a public annoucement.

So till the Bhutanese king comes out and makes that public announcement, you have no business in Bhutan, do you ? :lol:
 
.
"This tension can be resolved at the diplomatic level. Across the table we can solve all the problems," Minister of State for Defence said.

india-china-border_650x400_71499049913.jpg


"The Chinese troops should stay where they were earlier," said Minister of State for Defence.

NEW DELHI: The border standoff between armies of India and China at the Sikkim sector can be resolved diplomatically and Chinese soldiers should leave the Bhutanese territory to reduce tension in the area, Minister of State for Defence Subhash Bhamre said on Wednesday.

"I think the issue can be resolved at the diplomatic level. The Chinese troops should stay where they were earlier. China is approaching towards Bhutanese territory. We want them not to come forward."

"This is our security concern and this is our stand. Bhutan's King had yesterday given a statement that Chinese (troops) are entering into its territory. This tension can be resolved at the diplomatic level. Across the table we can solve all the problems," Mr Bhamre said.


Mr Bhamre's comments came on a day China accused India of "trampling" on the principles of the Panchsheel pact and demanded that India "correct its mistakes" by pulling back its troops immediately.

Chinese envoy to India Luo Zhaohui had yesterday said China had ruled out a compromisein the military standoff with India and put the onus on New Delhi to resolve the "grave" situation.


China and India have been engaged in a standoff in the Dokalam area near the Bhutan trijunction for the past 19 days after a Chinese army's construction party came to build a road.

Doka La is the Indian name for the region which Bhutan recognises as Dokalam, while China claims it as part of its Donglang region.

China and Bhutan are engaged in talks over the resolution of the area. Bhutan, however, has no diplomatic ties with China and it is supported militarily and diplomatically by India.

On the standoff, the Ministry of External Affairs had said India was "deeply concerned at the recent Chinese actions and has conveyed to the Chinese government that such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India".


http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/sikkim-standoff-can-be-resolved-diplomatically-india-1721140

"Can be resolved diplomatically"? It sounded like "please don't resolve the issue militarily".
 
.
India proved that it is peace loving country. China should now receprocate.
 
.
.
"Can be resolved diplomatically"? It sounded like "please don't resolve the issue militarily".

Don't be so desperate :lol:

"Can be resolved diplomatically" MEANS ""Can be resolved diplomatically"

When we want to say "please don't resolve the issue militarily", We will say "please don't resolve the issue militarily" :disagree:
 
.
India proved that it is peace loving country. China should now receprocate.


"Peace loving country" my foot. If there was a problem, it was between China and Bhutan. It has nothing to do with India. IA is either in Chinese soil or Bhutanese soil.
 
. .
Why don't you prove this part!!

@HariPrasad @HariVamsha @footmarks @SarthakGanguly @Fireurimagination @gslv mk3
Guys lets see what this Chinese has to say for this !

Nothing he says is relevant.

They just tried to bully Bhutan only to find that India is not the US to abandon our friends. A bad move by china that will seriously dent their international image.

"Peace loving country" my foot. If there was a problem, it was between China and Bhutan. It has nothing to do with India. IA is either in Chinese soil or Bhutanese soil.

We have got Bhutan's back as you have just learnt.

Now try to remember that.

We are both a peace loving and a war loving country. It depends on if the opponent is a friend or an enemy.
 
. .
Nothing he says is relevant.

They just tried to bully Bhutan only to find that India is not the US to abandon our friends. A bad move by china that will seriously dent their international image.



We have got Bhutan's back as you have just learnt.

Now try to remember that.

We are both a peace loving and a war loving country. It depends on if the opponent is a friend or an enemy.

Bhutan is a country no a state of India. You'd better make sure you know this fact. Since there are a lot of Bhutaness don't give a foot to Indian colonial master.
 
.
following masters order sound like relationship between indian and bhutan.
even so we also asked bhutan,buhtan told us that they dont know anything before about indian cross bhutan board.

the bhutanese king should come out and make a public annoucement.
And what kind of relationship you are trying to forge with Bhutan by illegally and forcefully trying to occupy their territory?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom