Indrani
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Not true... consider the following facts
1. Average height of Europeans in the 16-17 century was only about 152 cms. For his time, Napolean was an average heighted man.
2. The Indians were of far better physique than the British in the early colonial periods. Look up the battle paintings made by the British themselves - the Indians are heavier and taller.
3. the Japanese were so puny in the earlier part of 20th Century - now the number of 6 footers is very common.
4. See how tall children in the well off families of Delhi are - more than 6 feet is extremely common.
Racial height is mostly bull.... physique is correlated to food and physical activity. Indians, due to faulty food habits, have one of the poorest musculatures, especially in the South and the East.
While availability of better quality food (not necessarily nonveg) does increase the height it does so to the genetically taller people too. So while an average Indian height may go up to 6, the Danes will be achieving a height then of 6' 4". Which means Indians then will still measure around the global medium average. As demonstrated by the height difference between North and South Europeans given the same food availability. The Greeks who came to India even during the Maurya period noted Indians to be medium built but very very agile. That still remains true.
Also seen many vegetarians down South who are extremely tall.
Do you think there is anything wrong with India a part from muslims?
Congress, marxists, seculars, maoists, hyperfeminists, dodos, retards, slums, garbage, poor infrastructure, etc. etc.