Prodigy17
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 432
- Reaction score
- 0
You can bet you don't know more than me about Sikhs!
I wil grant you that, only if it makes you confident of your absurd argument and makes you feel good about the pack of misconstrued and deliberate subterfuge that you unloaded in your previous post..........
Sikhs wanted the division of the original Punjab so that they can have a majority in the state and it was given to them. I have never seen a word of discontent from anyone on how the state was divided and I have lived in Chandigarh which is the capital of Punjab (and Haryana)!
You have never seen a word of discontent from muslims (atleast that is what i have gathered from your post), christians and Sikhs because you have deliberately decided to delude your self into it. None of their fault and it doesnt take away their veritable aspirations merely because Vinod has not seen or heard it. Probably, they are fearful of talking about it openly infront of right wing guys.
Sikhs live all over India having strong pockets in Punjab (obviously), Haryana, Delhi, parts of Rajasthan, Uttaranchal etc. I am not sure what you mean by claiming parts of different states. if you mean they would like them to be a part of Punjab you are mistaken.
Surely some one is mistaken here, but i am confident that it would not be me. If the division was to be on lingual lines then these strong pockets of Punjabi speaking people should have gone to Punjabi Suba. Why was Chandigarh made a union territory, if there were no misgivings about the division??????? why was Chandigarh supposed to be handed over to Punjab few years ago???????which btw has not happened...........................
Sikhs were not the only people who served the British Indian army. I am sure there were many time more Muslims in the army.
Correct, so were the favourites like Gorkhas, Punjabi Musalmans etc. All were rewarded. Gorkhas still continue to serve as mercenaries in British army. And the Punjabi Musalmans are the elite of today's Pakistan. So how do you want to prove your argument...........................
I pesonally know of several stories where the people came empty handed after losing all in Pakistan and have rebuilt themselves. It is not just the matter of starting well
You would surely know about the story of millions who came to Pakistan, some of them were not even fortunate to even have hands what to talk about empty one............... They mainly settled in Karachi and urban areas of Sindh. They also started their lives afresh and are doing much better as a burgeoning middle class community. At least, all Sikhs did not have to migrate, most were already well placed in the society and helped their fellow sikhs in their life.
Irrespective of what you mat feel about the "revolt", there was never one. The terrorists were defeated by the Punjab police manned by mostly Sikh officers.
Now, that is one big sweeping statement which can be termed as the biggest joke on this forum. Care to inform us why a Sikh body guard killed the serving prime minsiter of hindustan???????????????? Care to check the list of damages interms of life, property and infrastructure during the revolt???????? Your pedantic chauvinism makes you look like an intransigent school boy admantly holding on to his toy (read argument) no matter what.
Why Blue Star? Tell me why Lal Masjid!
Now you know.
Logical to ask a Pakistani about Lal Masjid........ but why are you running away from replying about Blue Star as a hindustani. Did it occur in Pakistan......... What is the relation ship of Lal Masjid with this thread which is discussing Sikhs and their discontentment with the oppression. Again, your pedantic insistence shows very well, how you behave when confronted with incontrovertible logic i-e run with tail between legs.