What's new

'Sikh Youth of Punjab' holds anti-indian rally at Amritsar

I do agree with both your arguments - 2002 and 2008 but 1984 it was one-sided unprovoked massacre - Congress leaders used voters' list to find out and kill Sikhs and they are still to get proper justice with only the small fish punished but I would not agree on frenzied Hindu mobs - RSS were in the forefront to protect the Sikhs at that time.

i agree with you on the 2002 and 2008 incidents but 1984 was a different story my basic point is why hasn't justice been carried out? for the Sikhs especially 10,000 Sikhs beaten and killed ruthlessly their dead bodies set ablaze in Delhi alone and not 1 single person convicted for the attacks.

I concur and that is why I did not say anything about the 84 riots while rebutting the point about 2002 and 2008. 84 was a blot on India's history perperated by the Congress goons of all religions (note: Jagdish Tytler is a Christian). It was not a religious riot..it was a political vendetta unleashed by the Congress and congress alone.

@punjabi sidhu - if Sikhs feel so strongly about the riots why keep voting for the Congress in punjab..make them bite the dust and automatically they will stop shielding the killers..They (congress) turned a blind eye towards the massacre of the Tamils in Lanka inspite of protests in TN and n the assembly elections they got 4 seats out of 60 odd seats they contested and that too because of alliance...now they are more open to our concerns..use your vote....congress will even li(k sh!t to get your vote. If you people keep voting for Congress inspite of their acts how will they even think of you ?
 
.
I concur and that is why I did not say anything about the 84 riots while rebutting the point about 2002 and 2008. 84 was a blot on India's history perperated by the Congress goons of all religions (note: Jagdish Tytler is a Christian). It was not a religious riot..it was a political vendetta unleashed by the Congress and congress alone.

@punjabi sidhu - if Sikhs feel so strongly about the riots why keep voting for the Congress in punjab..make them bite the dust and automatically they will stop shielding the killers..They (congress) turned a blind eye towards the massacre of the Tamils in Lanka inspite of protests in TN and n the assembly elections they got 4 seats out of 60 odd seats they contested and that too because of alliance...now they are more open to our concerns..use your vote....congress will even li(k sh!t to get your vote. If you people keep voting for Congress inspite of their acts how will they even think of you ?

how dare you call me a Khangrassi you think i support Congress? i am all for Modi led BJP gov't but even the BJP when they were in power did not do anything to prosecute those responsible for the 84 riots.
 
.
how dare you call me a Khangrassi you think i support Congress? i am all for Modi led BJP gov't but even the BJP when they were in power did not do anything to prosecute those responsible for the 84 riots.

:hitwall:...Read what I wrote properly....Isnt captain Amrainder Singh not a Sikh...are not the lakhs of those who vote for Congress in Punjab, Sikhs..? I was referring to them.

If they dont vote for Congress if Congress doesnt stop shielding the accused, then Congress will immediately sacrifice the bakras - Jagdish tytler and sajjan kumar for votes.
 
.
how dare you call me a Khangrassi you think i support Congress? i am all for Modi led BJP gov't but even the BJP when they were in power did not do anything to prosecute those responsible for the 84 riots.

Not you man,i am referring to Punjab.

why is someone like Amarinder Singh still in a party like congress?
 
.
it is anti Congress protest. They have nothing to do against India. they are some wings of national parties. It is internal matter of India related to Elections.
Let us leave the topic here. Nothing credible.
 
.
wooo man thats deadly two nation theory pakistan was created form it may bee we will see sikhistan soon:yahoo:
 
.
soo shame we should support the minorities of india, i dont know why we always talk about muslims in india when other minorities like sikhs & christains are equally supressed by hindus.
 
. . .
Kashmiri Pandits :undecided:

Not much cared of they are, and no use in talking about them for all parties including Indians :tdown:. While in no way do i support or even remain neutral (which means i condemn strongly all these episodes) i think the plight of Kashmiri pandits is less glamorous to talk of for all people.
 
. . . .
with Lahore as its capital ?? :rofl:

well we dont mind affiliating sikhs with us make a bigger punjab and I m sure sikhs will live more peacefuly with us and considering Indian human rights record ...Caste-related violence in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and its about the hindus of lower castes ..one can imagine their treatment with sikhs and other minorities..Maoists wants their independence ,southern indians already hate northern indians, ZERO TO ZILLIONTH: NORTH INDIANS Vs SOUTH INDIANS....kashmiries want independence...I can see india in pieces soon unless they start giving poeple their rights and reduce poverty...
 
.
Why would they want Lahore? the city barely has any Sikhs in it.
And besides, it's not even in their own province.
Khalistan would be based on east Punjab that is currently part of India
 
.
Back
Top Bottom