Jatts were some of the best calvary men against Alexander the greek, my friend.
Porus wasn't a jatt if that's what you're getting at. Jatts were probably not even Punjab back then as they are said to be foreign.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jatts were some of the best calvary men against Alexander the greek, my friend.
Porus wasn't a jatt if that's what you're getting at. Jatts were probably not even Punjab back then as they are said to be foreign.
They were a nomadic Sindhi tribe. They were in these regions far longer than wikipedia cites.
Not sure if they fought Alexander though. They're said to have fought Muhammad Ghauri in south Punjab though.
Jatts were some of the best calvary men against Alexander the greek, my friend.
You need to study more. DI Khan, Tank and Lakki marwat were ruled by nawab of mankera so after his defeat these areas automatically went to sikhs. Ranjeet singh arrived with 25,000 soldiers along river kurram at lakki. Marwats sought refuge in hills along with their cattle, as they used to do it during large invasions. Bannu on that occasion was spared. But an army was sent to collect tribute next year. Sir edward writes that people of bannu are cowards so their villages were built forts for defence. Sikhs failed to collect tribute from them after seige of 450 fortified villages.D.I.Khan, Mianwali and Lakki Marwat were also under Sikhs. All Hazara and Swabi, Charsadda area was under the Sikhs. The Yousafzais had been attacked on many occasions, but Sikhs didn't enter Swat. The Pakhtuns of Peshawar collaborated with Sikhs. General ventura of Sikhs use to give severe punishments to captured Pakhtun rebels. The taxation for Lakki Marwat, D.I.Khan and Mianwali was handed over to Fateh Khan Tiwana, who killed a number of Pakhtun chieftains in D.I.Khan over a petty argument.
And even local sources claim 180 dead in Sarargarhi haha. But of course, had it been 21 pakhtuns vs 10,000 sikhs, the afghani would have celebrated it. lol. You should be thankful to Pakistan for granting your family relative peace and an internet connection. The Pakistan army that you talk shit about is the reason why most Pakistan is peaceful and people like you ran away from their own country. Why don't you help your countrymen for a change and stop enjoying the peace ensured by Pak army. Pak army zindabaad.
Who was your reply meant for? :S
You need to study more. DI Khan, Tank and Lakki marwat were ruled by nawab of mankera so after his defeat these areas automatically went to sikhs. Ranjeet singh arrived with 25,000 soldiers along river kurram at lakki. Marwats sought refuge in hills along with their cattle, as they used to do it during large invasions. Bannu on that occasion was spared. But an army was sent to collect tribute next year. Sir edward writes that people of bannu are cowards so their villages were built forts for defence. Sikhs failed to collect tribute from them after seige of 450 fortified villages.
In tank they were busy looting and plundering villages, when they were suddenly invaded by neighbouring mehsuds. Sikhs were defeated and slaughtered. Sikhs never came to tank again but they did come to lakki on annual basis and made second attempt on bannu in which bannuchis sought help of wazirs and drove away sikhs. Sikhs stopped coming altogather after death of hari singh. They were able to truely establish their rule at hazara. But in peshawer region they were stopped at mardan and their khans and charsada khans agreed to pay tribute. Peshawer went to sikhs without any resistance in 1834 while at nowshera sikhs had to fight three large battles in one of which syed ahmad bareilwi also participated.
Rangars were muslim Rajputs from Haryana, Delhi and western UP. They used to speak the khari boli dialect (parent dialect of Urdu language) as their mother tongue.
I do have heard about about muslim rajputs of mewat who joined alliance with rana sanga and lodhis against babur. So they are not punjabi rajputs.
Jats also killed and looted razia sultana and her husband while they were escaping.Not sure if they fought Alexander though. They're said to have fought Muhammad Ghauri in south Punjab though.
You need to study more. DI Khan, Tank and Lakki marwat were ruled by nawab of mankera so after his defeat these areas automatically went to sikhs. Ranjeet singh arrived with 25,000 soldiers along river kurram at lakki. Marwats sought refuge in hills along with their cattle, as they used to do it during large invasions. Bannu on that occasion was spared. But an army was sent to collect tribute next year. Sir edward writes that people of bannu are cowards so their villages were built forts for defence. Sikhs failed to collect tribute from them after seige of 450 fortified villages.
In tank they were busy looting and plundering villages, when they were suddenly invaded by neighbouring mehsuds. Sikhs were defeated and slaughtered. Sikhs never came to tank again but they did come to lakki on annual basis and made second attempt on bannu in which bannuchis sought help of wazirs and drove away sikhs. Sikhs stopped coming altogather after death of hari singh. They were able to truely establish their rule at hazara. But in peshawer region they were stopped at mardan and their khans and charsada khans agreed to pay tribute. Peshawer went to sikhs without any resistance in 1834 while at nowshera sikhs had to fight three large battles in one of which syed ahmad bareilwi also participated.
That doesnt make any sense. Entire india is also opened for their sikh citizens and they are quite well represented in every field.but the bottom line is that now Pashtun's enemy sikhs who were plundering pashtun lands have been Pushed across Wahga and the little territory that they have left is always in danger of being overrun by UP/biharis while Pashtun(like all Pakistanis) got whole Pakistan; fertile plains, sea ports, unparalleled Gilgit Baltistan, above all almost whole Indus region we must be thankful to Quaid for all this. Do you agree?
Do you have any citations of reading done on the topic or just your own opinion? Do you even know the social standing of Jatts in north Punjab. Jatts never had any military power in Potohar in its history. Of course, no offence meant to jatts.