Sikh group seeks prosecution of Modi in Canada for 2002 riots

[uparyupari]

Don't you have some christians to attack?

Don't you have any Hindus to attack dip$hit ?

 

[Tshering22]

Don't understand what does Sikh's in Canada have to do with 2002 and not with 1984? Are they in payroll of ISI?

SFJ from what I know and hear are the khali-stani ones. The ones who have perennial hatred for our country and have been fed on a steady diet of hate by ISI affiliated groups and advocacy agencies. These separatists ran away to these countries and there they are used by the intel agencies there to hate India and attack us.

 

[East or West India Best]

Don't you have any Hindus to attack dip$hit ?

Attack yindoos like this:

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Sikh group Sikhs for Justice seeks prosecution of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Canada for 2002 riots - The Hindu
Updated: April 9, 2015 15:03 IST
PTI

The Hindu
Modi will travel to Canada next week, marking the first standalone visit by an Indian Prime Minister in over 42 years. Photo: Prashant Nakwe
Sikhs for Justice has filed a 16-page complaint seeking criminal proceedings against him.

Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Canada next week, a Sikh rights group has filed a complaint with the country's Attorney General seeking criminal proceedings against him for alleged offences during the 2002 anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat.

Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) has filed the 16-page complaint asking Canadian Attorney General and Minister of Justice Peter Mackay to “bring charges or to consent to charges” being sought against Modi for allegedly “aiding and abetting” the violence against Muslims during the 2002 riots in Gujarat when he was Chief Minister.

The same group had filed a lawsuit in connection with the 2002 riots against Modi when he had visited the US last year in September.

The US, however, had said that Modi is immune from the human rights violation lawsuit since he is the sitting head of a foreign government.

SFJ said Canadian law provides for prosecution of individuals who commit acts of torture outside of Canada and are present in the country at some time.

SFJ Attorney Marlys Edward said state immunity does not prevent Canadian authorities from charging and trying Modi for torture and genocide.

“Since Modi continues to enjoy immunity in India, we are invoking the Canadian law to hold him accountable for gross human rights violations. Unlike India, Canada does not let violence against religious minorities go unpunished,” SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun said.

Modi will travel to Canada next week, marking the first standalone visit by an Indian Prime Minister in over 42 years.

The last such visit took place in 1973.


*******************

Supreme Court has gave the decision.

Nice try to stay in limelight... these buggers know that they can't do a Sh!t about it.. but they like making headlines.

 

[Tshering22]

The Sikhs have gone Mad. @darrius.

SFJ are not Sikhs.

They are the khali-stani separatists who ran away and hid themselves in those countries.

Please don't compare them to the numerous Sikhs who have stood and bled for India.

Attack yindoos like this:

Hey man that was a Congi thing.

Let's not infight over past tragedies. You and we both know 'Hindus' at large had nothing to do with this.

 

[uparyupari]

SFJ are not Sikhs.

They are the khali-stani separatists who ran away and hid themselves in those countries.

Please don't compare them to the numerous Sikhs who have stood and bled for India.

Naah... that comment was for Darrius who made the comment "hindus have gone mad" in a different thread.

Attack yindoos like this:

Go seek justice in Cananda. You are not an Indian citizen anymore, remember ?

 

[East or West India Best]

SFJ are not Sikhs.

They are the khali-stani separatists who ran away and hid themselves in those countries.

Please don't compare them to the numerous Sikhs who have stood and bled for India.



Hey man that was a Congi thing.

Let's not infight over past tragedies. You and we both know 'Hindus' at large had nothing to do with this.

It wasn't a congress thing it was a typical yindoo genocide against non-yindoos. The same thing happens against Christians and Muslims. yindoos are inclined towards oppressing others, just look at their history. If it was a congress thing then we would see people of all faiths attacking Sikhs, but that isn't the case.

Go seek justice in Cananda. You are not an Indian citizen anymore, remember ?

Like I said yindoo, go attack some Christians.

 

[uparyupari]

Like I said yindoo, go attack some Christians.

You better worry about some white trash coming to beat up your turbaned @ss.

Heard they call you Diaper head out there

 

[East or West India Best]

You better worry about some white trash coming to beat up your turbaned @ss.

Heard they call you Diaper head out there

lol yindoo why you so angry? Are you guys Africans or what?

I found Kirshna

 

[Tshering22]

It wasn't a congress thing it was a typical yindoo genocide against non-yindoos. The same thing happens against Christians and Muslims. yindoos are inclined towards oppressing others, just look at their history. If it was a congress thing then we would see people of all faiths attacking Sikhs, but that isn't the case.

You are wrong.

This is nothing but misjudgement.

First of all, Xtians were not attacked by Hindus. All the reported attacks were proven false by the investigations done. Either they were ex employees of local churches or drunken college kids doing vandalism.

Please read further.

How did you know that Congressis that attacked in 1984 were from a religion? Were they having their religions on their heads? No right?

I could wear a turban and attack a bunch of whites in USA. But will it make me a Sikh? No.

Buddy, politics can get very dirty. It isn't like that.

And this is coming from a minority here.

Please stop this madness.

The group is talking about some stupid Khali-stanis trying to falsely charge our PM and we are all fighting here based on false perceptions.

Guys, as a personal experience, Hindus have not attacked any minorities here. And neither were Sikhs against Hindus in Punjab.

These separatists ran away killing innocents everywhere and left the political goons to do the carnage in India.

And all of you are insulting each other.

 

[uparyupari]

lol yindoo why you so angry? Are you guys Africans or what?

I found Kirshna

LOL..... how many of your Sikh Guru's were Hindoos ?

How about Guru nanak ? was he a Hindu ? How about his son Sri Chand ?

 

[Dragon Ball]

You are wrong.

This is nothing but misjudgement.

First of all, Xtians were not attacked by Hindus. All the reported attacks were proven false by the investigations done. Either they were ex employees of local churches or drunken college kids doing vandalism.

Please read further.

How did you know that Congressis that attacked in 1984 were from a religion? Were they having their religions on their heads? No right?

I could wear a turban and attack a bunch of whites in USA. But will it make me a Sikh? No.

Buddy, politics can get very dirty. It isn't like that.

Actually, the Khalistanis were against the Hindus and a huge part of Punjab had turned Khalistan supporters. There was a long gestation period before the Delhi riots. A period were Hindus and Sikhs who supported those Hindus were routinely massacred. The story was not much different to how you hear nowadays of Hazaras of being offloaded from buses and being shot for simply being Hazaras. Then it was the Hindus who were being killed for being Hindus.

 

[Tshering22]

Actually, the Khalistanis were against the Hindus and a huge part of Punjab had turned Khalistan supporters. There was a long gestation period before the Delhi riots. A period were Hindus and Sikhs who supported those Hindus were routinely massacred. The story was not much different to how you hear nowadays of Hazaras of being offloaded from buses and being shot for simply being Hazaras. Then it was the Hindus who were being killed for being Hindus.

I am aware of that.

My wife hails from a punjabi Sanatani family with her own relatives having faced the brunt of those bad times, having being shot by the separatists.

That's the reason why I call those separatists as khali-stanis (or empty headed morons who insult Sikh principles of kindness and humanity).

I am trying to calm down the misunderstanding between the two people here Uparyupari and East or West India best.

Both are going in a totally wrong direction.

 

[Dragon Ball]

I am aware of that.

My wife hails from a punjabi Sanatani family with her own relatives having faced the brunt of those bad times, having being shot by the separatists.

That's the reason why I call those separatists as khali-stanis (or empty headed morons who insult Sikh principles of kindness and humanity).

I am trying to calm down the misunderstanding between the two people here Uparyupari and East or West India best.

Both are going in a totally wrong direction.

East of West India is Best is a Khalistani who has grown up with hatred of Hindus in his vein. There is no way one can reason or should attempt to reason with people like him.

 

[uparyupari]

I am aware of that.

My wife hails from a punjabi Sanatani family with her own relatives having faced the brunt of those bad times, having being shot by the separatists.

That's the reason why I call those separatists as khali-stanis (or empty headed morons who insult Sikh principles of kindness and humanity).

I am trying to calm down the misunderstanding between the two people here Uparyupari and East or West India best.

Both are going in a totally wrong direction.

Dude "East or west India best" is a closet Khalistan. I have wrestled with him before.