What's new

Sign nuclear non-proliferation treaty, Japan tells India

medulla

BANNED
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
The Hindu : News / National : Sign nuclear non-proliferation treaty, Japan tells India

India-Japan_1069603f.jpg


Japan on Monday asked India to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) even as the two sides decided to reopen talks on a bilateral civil nuclear agreement.

During the sixth Foreign Minister-level strategic dialogue here, the two sides agreed to prepare a master plan for the industrial development of south India, especially areas around Chennai and Bangalore, and accelerate talks on export of rare earths to Japan.

Another decision was to extend their dialogue to a code of conduct in outer space, cyber security and maritime issues, including security and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. The talks also covered Japanese investment in high speed trains, the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor and the Dedicated Freight Corridor. While agreeing to step up interaction between the Coast Guards, India and Japan decided to hold their first-ever maritime exercises towards the middle of the year.

New Delhi and Tokyo agreed to resume their dialogue on a civil nuclear agreement but the initial reaction from the principal interlocutors — Foreign Ministers S.M. Krishna and Koichiro Gemba — suggested that both sides were sticking to their earlier positions — India insisting that its non-proliferation behaviour was impeccable enough to warrant the inking of the pact and Japan wanting India to comply with its promise of a ban on further nuclear testing made in the run-up to a clearance by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).

A joint statement, after the Fifth Energy dialogue held earlier in the day, indicated that despite the sentiments expressed by the Foreign Ministers, both sides were maintaining positions that were some distance from being reconciled. The statement mentioned in detail prospects of cooperation and ongoing projects in all segments but civil nuclear agreement.

“Japan is asking India to join the NPT… the Foreign Ministers instructed the negotiators to hold talks … Japan views India as a partner with which it should pursue civil nuclear agreement, there is no doubt [about] it,” said Japanese sources after the official round of talks and a courtesy call by Mr. Gemba on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

“We have instructed our negotiators on the way forward,” Mr. Krishna said and added the two countries understood the “concerns” of each other which were related to their historic experiences. Officials explained this to mean that while India says its clean non-proliferation record was good enough to restart civil nuclear talks, Japan feels that since India is not a signatory to the NPT, it should demonstrate its commitment to a ban on testing in words.

On maritime dialogue, Mr. Gemba said, “India is actually situated at an important place on the sea lanes of the communication which links Japan with the Middle East. So, I cannot overlook the geo-political significance of the location of India.”

Japanese companies have a virtual monopoly on supplying reactor vessels, a critical component of civil nuclear plants. Officials in the past said that without an India-Japan civil nuclear agreement, Japanese origin firms might not be able to supply components to French and American companies which had won orders to instal nuclear plants in India.

On the trade front, India has extended the validity of an earlier agreement to supply two million tonnes of iron ore per year. It will thus retain its foothold in the Japanese market despite supply disruptions due to court rulings and higher taxes. There is also domestic unease over exporting primary commodities that has led to India slipping from its position as the world's top iron exporter to the third place.

Ahead of the strategic dialogue, the External Affairs Ministry had said the two sides would review all aspects of the bilateral strategic and global partnership and discuss regional and international issues of mutual interest.

The talks were sandwiched between high-level consultations with the U.S. — a summit-level Japan-U.S. meeting took place last month and India and the U.S. will hold their Foreign Minister-level strategic dialogue next week.
 
.
Why should India sign the NPT? Signing it would force India to forswear its nuclear option. Acceding to NPT means accepting the three basic principles represented by it:
> Non-proliferation
> Disarmament
> The right to only peaceful usees of nuclear technology.

Therefore, can a country, placed as India is, with a 'hostile' neighborhood sign the NPT, more so when the very foundations of the treaty are being shaken thoroughly?

Two main objections are:

> NPT creates a club of "nuclear haves" and a larger group of "nuclear have-nots" by restricting the legal possession of nuclear weapons to those states that tested them before 1967. But the treaty never explains on what ethical grounds such a distinction is valid.

> More importantly, while China is recognized as a nuclear ‘have’, India cannot remain a nuclear ‘have not’!!

So, Japan asking India to sign the NPT doesn't stand to reason.
 
. .
India please sign the NPT if you want the world to believe that you are a "responsible state".
 
.
Arre..

These are the mandatory ' noises' countries have to make to remain in consonance with national policies etc.

This is the operative part ..

"the two sides decided to reopen talks on a bilateral civil nuclear agreement."

With India , its self interest first. The world needs us more than what we need them.
 
.
too late!! India has achieved so much without signing the deal.. countries will have to accomodate india regardless! It's a formality for every country who wants to do nuclear business with india, to beat NPT drum. Take Australia for example..
 
. .
India please sign the NPT if you want the world to believe that you are a "responsible state".

our solid non proliferation record is enough to belive that we are responsible state. I think its time for pakistan to gain some get some reputation of being responsible Nation and Prove loyality of USA. Hence Pakistan must sign NTP.
 
.
India please sign the NPT if you want the world to believe that you are a "responsible state".

If we can show middle finger to west over NPT, Japan does not bother to us any more. They will get the same results!!!

As far as your point of view is concerned, we are not a responsible state but world have made us to believe so.... Have a chill!!!
 
. .
India please sign the NPT if you want the world to believe that you are a "responsible state".

It works other way round when it comes to India. It's for India to believe how responsible the world is when they deal with a responsible nuclear state & irresponsible nuclear state. US, France, Russia.. all passed their test. Aussies passed their test few months ago. It's for Japs to prove now..
 
.
They have to ask, because they are supposed to be at the forefront of global non-proliferation.

But I don't think they really care.


Australia made the same noises, based on the same rationale, but ended up selling Uranium to India anyway.

Abs correct.

The operative part is highlighted above.
 
.
They have to ask, because they are supposed to be at the forefront of global non-proliferation.

But I don't think they really care.

Australia made the same noises, based on the same rationale, but ended up selling Uranium to India anyway.


That's because USA forced Australia to sell Uranium to India.

India is major tool in USA's anti-China arsenal.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom