What's new

Should we accept Sweden into NATO?

Should we accept Sweden into NATO?

  • YES - Sweden should gain the trust of other member countries of the union with the steps it will tak

    Votes: 26 44.1%
  • NO - If Sweden is to continue supporting terrorism, it must get along with Russia

    Votes: 35 59.3%

  • Total voters
    59
Denmark has $482 billion of debt ( 119% of GDP ) and per capita debt : $81.965

Denmark is another country which is heading for possible bancrupcy.


without the EU money from Germany-France your countries Greece,Denmark,etc are nothing




source : your arse

Reality
Turkiye is refusing Sweden because Sweden support PKK terrorism against Turkiye
Maybe you should stop calculating and just google exact numbers. You are probably using debt in danish currency (kr) and GDP in US dollars.
2022
Denmark debt to GDP ratio 30.1%
Turkey debt to GDP ratio 31.7%
 
.
source : your arse

Reality
Turkiye is refusing Sweden because Sweden support PKK terrorism against Turkiye

Everybody is saying the same here, even the Turkiye loyal friends, it's obvious.

Turkiye is squeezing NATO rich members to make juice and get money.

Turkiye also refused Finland in the first time, and then they changed their opinion? Why? Money talks :enjoy:.
 
.
Doing blackmail to "allies" to get money is not a nice thing to say it openly.

So states use a diplomatic language plenty of euphemisms and excuses.

But in the end, that's called blackmail and extortion to get money.

If support PKK nutjobs is the real reason, then they should say before and ask stop support them or leave NATO.

But what they really want is money, money, money.

And it's perfect. And well done, if you make an alliance, you should help your allies to develop themselves and dont ignore them.
 
.
Since the dawn of humanity,various people of different races,nations,countries,religions,cultures and occupations have tried to discuss and exchange opinions with MMM-E. They have all failed.

It is either "Turkey is the best and you all suck" or nothing.
 
.
Everybody is saying the same here, even the Turkiye loyal friends, it's obvious.

Turkiye is squeezing NATO rich members to make juice and get money.

Turkiye also refused Finland in the first time, and then they changed their opinion? Why? Money talks :enjoy:.

what a silly troll team
source = your arse as always

liar clowns ... same users with different false flager accounts
since 2013 IMF wants to give money to Turkiye ..but ERDOGAN says NO

even Turkiye is the best donor country in the world to compare with GDP

between 2010 and 2022 , Turkiye spend $100 billion for humanitarian aid to other muslim countries

what about your trash countries Greece-Spain ? nothing
 
Last edited:
. .
Poor clowns first go and pay your huge debt
USA-The EU's vassals = Greece , Spain and others

Per capita DEBT

Belgium $269.000
Spain $170.000
Sweden $159.000
Denmark $81.000
Greece $42.800
Turkiye : only $5.155


Spain,Greece and other vassals dont have advanced defense industry
( you are so weak without USA - NATO )

Garbage Countries Greece-Spain and their garbage homes , hospitals , airports , highways , roads , hotels , buildings , etc

Thanks to president Erdogan for $1 trillion public project to modernize Turkiye between 2003 and 2023

now Turkiye is one of top 10 countries in the world with the best infrastructure
( garbage Greece-Spain not even close )
The problem is that Turkey is on a track to only have defense industry and tourism.
And in the same time more and more turkish peoples are starving...
>60% inflation rate.
Good job Edo !

2950 Billion from African resources.
Classical islamist fake news.

Just for your information, when the french secured Algeria from the arabs, there was no road, no hospital, some dust made harbors.
When we leave, all that is already in the country was made by the french. And we didn't destroyed it in 1962.

between 2010 and 2022 , Turkiye spend $100 billion for humanitarian aid to other muslim countries

what about your trash countries Greece-Spain ? nothing
We already have christians to help, mainly hurt by muslims terrorists, so don't expect us to help muslim countries.

Should we accept Sweden into NATO?​


Should we accept Nato?
Coming from a German it is funny.
 
Last edited:
. .
...

Let us recall once again the conversation that brought the Cold War to an end.

There is an English version and there is another one in Russian.

The version I have read is the English version which is accessible at the National Security Archive at Georgetown University.

(This version has paragraphs crossed out from when the document was declassified. Those who have read the Russian version say that the English version kept in Washington contains the essentials. And indeed, the gist of the conversation that ended the Cold War is very well understood.):

-If we leave Germany then Germany would be a sovereign country and could develop the Atomic Bomb, so we might as well stay and ...

"if we stay in a Germany that is part of NATO NATO will not advance an inch to the East."


-All right, said the Russian

(A French historian asked the Russian at the end of his days how he could be so naive, and he answered: -I thought I was among normal people)
 
. .
Above I have quoted from memory, the words according to the document we can access at Georgetown University's National Security Archive

Baker: Germany could be a sovereign country

Gorvachev: yes ... "The German question is the key question, it is critical to the Poles"

Baker: "That's right"

Gorvachev: (Blank paragraph, deleted, censored)

Baker: "If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is part of NATO, there would be no extension of NATO one inch to the East"
 
.
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom