Should Sharia be Established in Bangladesh?

[Luffy 500]

Sharia would not have allowed you to go be a student under a Christian nation. You would be shown the map to the nearest Madarasa. did you in your college application state that women sitting in the same class was against your sharia beliefs?

First of all u being a ignorant troll has no business in this type of thread opened by one of your own shiv shena countrymen. Who feed you such retarded ideas about Islamic laws or did u just made that up?

 

[jetti]

No, first of all that is a lie that people say blacks started HIV and secondly even if they did the first cases started in South African countries where Islam is not even a strong minority. Example in Liberia 2/3 people have HIV (this was an old stat it may have changed now).

Secondly he was being sarcastic how you did not see that is beyond me.

nope it came from sub sahran africa , not s afrida.

second i was also kidding , couldnt you see that.

 

[Bhairava]

Hell yeah...

 

[KingMamba]

Nope rape needs 4 witness. if free sex is immoral, then why did muslim armies carry away women of defeated people (both muslim and nonmuslim) if a man arries multiple women and widows can marry other men, then it become equal to free sex.
same disease will be spread.
islam is not suited to intelligent people where people are free to question ideas.

See this is the problem non Muslims like this guy think they know our laws better than ourselves. Get a life you will never have to live in a Muslim majority country so none of this affects you anyway. The rest of your post is retarded.

 

[jetti]

If that was the case physically maimed people would have been a common sight in KSA. But that doesn't happen. The severity of the punishment is go grave that people can't even think of committing such crimes, the law it self serve as a deterrent. But the implementation depends on the socio-economic parameters of the state and society.

As for nepotism ans status of the rich, U have to look back to the early ISLAMIC age of say the Rashidun chaliphate as it serves the best model of how Sharia can be implemented based on the different parameters of the society. Not even the governors of provinces and their families were spared by ISLAMIC law in those societies.

actualy even before that look at ram rajya or bharat varsha in our lands. it was even better than anything arabs could dream of and more civilised.

 

[KingMamba]

The same misinterpretation is what I am talking about and this will be true for almost all Islamic laws, you leave it at the hands of the few who label themselves as scholars to interpret it as they wish and not a proper rule of law defined by the people's popular mandate. hope you got it now.

The populations of countries now are way to large for popular mandate be used for each and every law, that is the very reason parliaments/ congress branch of governance is used the world over.

 

[jetti]

See this is the problem non Muslims like this guy think they know our laws better than ourselves. Get a life you will never have to live in a Muslim majority country so none of this affects you anyway. The rest of your post is retarded.

do talibans know islam better than you. at least they claim to. that doesnt stop you from preaching to taliban.
now, the 5 pillar of islam NEVER states that prophet is last messenger. only that prophet is a messenger. but still you tell ahmadis (SAW) are not muslims
just because im not muslim doesnt mean i cant know about islam. if police did not know the way of the thief there need not be a police department

First of all u being a ignorant troll has no business in this type of thread opened by one of your own shiv shena countrymen. Who feed you such retarded ideas about Islamic laws or did u just made that up?

hey you are a brother from a fellow secular nation. whats your problem. your contries agrees that no religion is better than the other and all are equal just like mine

 

[KingMamba]

Bangladesh must not be measured by some posters of PDF only.. It is a country with tons of intellectual peoples & they know what is the best way for their living. We as other nation citizens only have to observe & learn from their goods & keep their bads out of ourselves.

So the debate must be started by BD member & let them counter in their manner, I don`t understand why we make responsible every member taking shade of religion when we always accuse them in that same manner?

India has nothing to do if BD change the whole F@@ng constitute in according to Sharia law or any XTZ pattern.

Only Indian poster that makes sense on this thread, if Bangladesh people's majority prefers this governance than why does anyone care if it is implemented.

 

[clmeta]

You know Muslims are heavily divided about whats written in Quran. Hence it makes no sense to explain it to Kaffirs like us. For eg, Muslims are divided whether suicide bombings are allowed or not, music is allowed or not, dargah is allowed or not, women should study /drive or not and man and woman should be kept separately or not etc etc.
And that's why different countries have different systems. And that's why there are so many sects etc.

3. Shariah is derived from Quran. If Beard and burkha is made compulsory it will go against Quran! As Quran says - There is no compulsion in religion. Surah Baqara ayat 256

 

[jetti]

The populations of countries now are way to large for popular mandate be used for each and every law, that is the very reason parliaments/ congress branch of governance is used the world over.

islam and sharia does not have clear law, its very rudimentary maximum for street level or village level. thats why it cant be applied to countries. too many interpretations are allowed

Only Indian poster that makes sense on this thread, if Bangladesh people's majority prefers this governance than why does anyone care if it is implemented.

because if sharia is implemented in a neighbor of india, then we wil be affected due to more terrorism

You know Muslims are heavily divided about whats written in Quran. Hence it makes no sense to explain it to Kaffirs like us. For eg, Muslims are divided whether suicide bombings are allowed or not, music is allowed or not, dargah is allowed or not, women should study /drive or not and man and woman should be kept separately or not etc etc.
And that's why different countries have different systems. And that's why there are so many sects etc.

if quran says there is no compulsion then why follow it.

 

[KingMamba]

do talibans know islam better than you. at least they claim to. that doesnt stop you from preaching to taliban.
now, the 5 pillar of islam NEVER states that prophet is last messenger. only that prophet is a messenger. but still you tell ahmadis (SAW) are not muslims
just because im not muslim doesnt mean i cant know about islam. if police did not know the way of the thief there need not be a police department



hey you are a brother from a fellow secular nation. whats your problem. your contries agrees that no religion is better than the other and all are equal just like mine

The 5 pillars does not say it but it is in the Quran so yes they are not Muslims. Taliban claim to know what is best for Afghanistan and the jurisprudence they follow is the same as the KSA which by the way most posters on this forum are against. We know the Wahhabis are wrong the problem is they have millions upon billions of dollars to further their goals.

 

[clmeta]

Lets destroy railways. Forget English. Ban internet. Ban cars and then start building science and technology again.
Some people are desperate to become medieval. And using this sick logic, why not revert 5000 years back to Indus Valley civilization and then start modernizing?

1.Hindustan/ SA was not an uncivilized lawless country / society before the English Co crept into power. Our administrative machinery was well organized delivering service to the people. There was peace in society. The culprits were always punished through due process of law. There was accountability by officials at every level. A man could even go and see the Emperor seeking redress. Whenever required the Qazi would summon even the Emperor to answer charges. Never have we heard of any miscarriage of justice till the dirty English came with their English Common Law. The first glaring example of the fraudulent nature of this law was witnessed in the famous Nandkumar Trial at Calcutta.

2. Not merely BD, all of SA should revert to pre-1757 laws and administrative system, and reform into modernity from there.

 

[illusion8]

The populations of countries now are way to large for popular mandate be used for each and every law, that is the very reason parliaments/ congress branch of governance is used the world over.

And, the parliaments/ congress are elected by the people - and the people are free to protest against any rule or law and can go to court to have them repealed - it is not based on old literature but on what's current and whats required presently.

 

[KingMamba]

islam and sharia does not have clear law, its very rudimentary maximum for street level or village level. thats why it cant be applied to countries. too many interpretations are allowed



because if sharia is implemented in a neighbor of india, then we wil be affected due to more terrorism



if quran says there is no compulsion then why follow it.

So basically you are an Islamophobe, gotcha OK.

 

[jetti]

The 5 pillars does not say it but it is in the Quran so yes they are not Muslims. Taliban claim to know what is best for Afghanistan and the jurisprudence they follow is the same as the KSA which by the way most posters on this forum are against. We know the Wahhabis are wrong the problem is they have millions upon billions of dollars to further their goals.

haha.. so you say wahabs are wrong muslims and they say you are wrong muslim,. first agree on what is right or wrong.
second.. your peopl in this forum said thatif they follow 5 pillars they are muslims. now you are saying that everything in quran has to be followed to be a muslim. quran is against interest in banking. so if any of you or family members take interest you are not muslim?

So basically you are an Islamophobe, gotcha OK.

no iam pro people and liberty.

Is islam against dancing and singing?