AMCA
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,027
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
You are referring to Rockstar 08?
Yup
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are referring to Rockstar 08?
Pakistan Navy would require Huge ships for the fact that it will be facing a heavy armada. You require capabilities augmented with Quantity to stop an enemy at its gates. You cannot do any sea denial with the current fleet Pakistan has.
And More over I dont have anything against Pakistan or its navy. My reply was to that gentleman who stated that IN is over hyped.
For sea denial a Navy don't need huge number of ships that is why small navies mostly adopt this doctrine. @Penguin can shed some light on the issue.
One has a Sea Control Doctrine and another has a Sea Denial. Now you want me to believe that a mightier navy would have to stop by its enemies gates just because its enemy has a sea denial doctrine with less ships. Don't you think that's bizarre by very logic.
You need to have technological edge over your enemy if you are quantitatively low to find a chance to defend your seas. More over you dont have anything as yet that can possibly stop Brahmos from making your navy its target.
@Penguin Bro please do let me know if I am wrong!!
Study cold war first, study US doctrine and their fleet capabilities with number of vessels and then USSR's doctrine and their fleet capabilities with number of vessels it may help you to understand the difference.
I am very well aware of that. Care to educate me on which part of their doctrines did you find a solution to pakistan Navy's present fleet strength and doctrine??
One navy can do sea denial in one area and sea control in another.One has a Sea Control Doctrine and another has a Sea Denial. Now you want me to believe that a mightier navy would have to stop by its enemies gates just because its enemy has a sea denial doctrine with less ships. Don't you think that's bizarre by very logic.
You need to have technological edge over your enemy if you are quantitatively low to find a chance to defend your seas. More over you dont have anything as yet that can possibly stop Brahmos from making your navy its target.
@Penguin Bro please do let me know if I am wrong!!
sureTo the PAKISTANI fan boy poster whio said indian Navy is overhyped
India commissions first-of-class destroyer Kolkata - IHS Jane's 360
Each one of these indengious destroyers cost the indian tax paper $1 billion each. They have 2 inducted and five more to follow
Each Arihant indengious nuclear sub costs $1 billion each one inducted four more to follow
TO PUT THIS INTO PERSPECTIVE
Pakistan ENTIRE navy budget was 700 million dollars last year.
The bigger question is can PN afford it? because they are not even able to purchase Type-54A (3600 ton) ship and purchasing F-22Ps (3000 ton) ship and here all are talking about Type-55 (12000) ton ship.
Why would PN need huge number of ships?? kindly see map again and check how big Indian coastline is and how small Pakistani coastline is when compared to each other, therefore PN don't need same number of ships as India has, also PN doctrine is sea denial not sea control like India has.