Should Pakistan Navy acquire carrier kill missile

[khurasaan1]

Guys need your opinion that should Pakistan accquire the one shot carrier kill Chinese made missile,give me your opinion and reasons for your opinion

The carrier killerz are not our need at this moment...cuz we dont have such kind of threat.....China got threat from US cuz it has to cover large portion of the globe to protect its sea routes as well its ally countries..........If ever we needed we can get them from China anytime ...but we dont need them to keep in our inventory.....I guess.......Alhamdolillah! we are fine without them.....

 

[Safriz]

Have you not heard of the Granit missiles ?
P-700 Granit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They are launched in a salvo and form a network.... The lead missile assigns targets to other missiles. The target is usually a Naval Task Force

For you conspiracy theory buffs ..... It is said that the Russian Kusrk was carrying these missiles when it sank. These missiles were stolen and used to attack the pentagon.

Missile weighing 7 tons at mach 2 will do something to the aircraft carrier..

 

[Galaxy]

For Info:

Air Craft Carrier are not in Front. It's mostly at Last. There are normally 3-5 layers of Shields.

Frigates + Destroyers + Anti Ballistic Missile equipped with heavy Navy Ships. There is 1%-5% Chance that it will breach all three. Then comes High Range Radar, Satellite second to second Monitoring.

Then Comes, Nuclear Submarine Which is unstoppable. So, Highly unlikely that it will breach all.

Then Air Craft Carrier with 15-25 Fighter Air Craft, Bomber, Missile (Ballistic + Cruise). In Addition, AC Carrier also consists High range Radar, ABM, etc.

AC Carrier is never used in initial stage. It's mostly once 50%+ opponent Navy in Sea and bases are destroyed. It takes 1 Minute to move AC Carrier + ABM to Stop + AC Fighter to Move. AC Carrier cost 2-4 Billion $ Only. But AC Fighter + 3 Layer Shield Costs 3-5 Billion $. Chance of Destroying AC Carrier is very less in any War until War is between U.S.A. and Iran.

 

[Jango]

The carrier killerz are not our need at this moment...cuz we dont have such kind of threat.....China got threat from US cuz it has to cover large portion of the globe to protect its sea routes as well its ally countries..........If ever we needed we can get them from China anytime ...but we dont need them to keep in our inventory.....I guess.......Alhamdolillah! we are fine without them.....

i have been noticing you for sometime. Please refrain from text language, it will help create a more professional feel to the forum, and potray you as a more intelligent man. No offence.

 

[Pak_Sher]

Pakistan should focus on getting the Carrier Killer Missiles instaed of going for a carrier. India has 2 though old ones, but itis acquiring new carriers and the Indian Navy will rely on these assets as a second or third strike capability. In case of a conflict PAF and PN should focus on taking out the carriers as the top priority.

 

[nightcrawler]

Well I must vote for such a missile; but unfortunately in our inventory or should I say that the only Chinese antiship missile as of today is YJ-62 / C-602, YingJi-62

which isn't supersonic when compared with India Klub/Yakhont/Sunburn family missiles; nor can supersede their ranges

Besides Chinese I think we have got (as offensive missiles) Exocets & nothing else I could think of

 

[khurasaan1]

i have been noticing you for sometime. Please refrain from text language, it will help create a more professional feel to the forum, and potray you as a more intelligent man. No offence.

Oh okay! Sorry. I mostly use text language so that I don't have to observe the punctuation marks all the time, to save time. Plus my english punctuation is very poor. I guess u might forgive my text writingz then, but still I gonna try to observe what u adviced me.......

 

[khurasaan1]

Pakistan should focus on getting the Carrier Killer Missiles instaed of going for a carrier. India has 2 though old ones, but itis acquiring new carriers and the Indian Navy will rely on these assets as a second or third strike capability. In case of a conflict PAF and PN should focus on taking out the carriers as the top priority.

I guess only one Carrier for India is not a problem for us cuz our RAAD with tactical Nuke can easily take care of it...

 

[Ajaxpaul]

Pakistanis grossly underestimate Indian Navy...Our Navy is going to become the biggest headache to pakistan in the future.

 

[DarK-LorD]

Our Navy is going to become the biggest headache to pakistan in the future.

It is already the biggest headache to Pakistan.

 

[Night_Raven]

I guess only one Carrier for India is not a problem for us cuz our RAAD with tactical Nuke can easily take care of it...

You need a nuke to take out a carrier , eh ?

 

[Jungibaaz]

Pakistanis grossly underestimate Indian Navy...Our Navy is going to become the biggest headache to pakistan in the future.

It is already the biggest headache to Pakistan.

Type54A, F-22P, missile boats, Agosta-90B, QING class Nuke subs.
RA'AD, C-802, C-803, Naval Babur, CJ-10K, Harpoon.

sorry to piss on your parade

---------- Post added at 11:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:27 AM ----------

You need a nuke to take out a carrier , eh ?

not really, a regular warhead will do just fine

 

[Galaxy]

People still missed the concept of "carrier kill missile"

To Destroy AC carrier You need to Destroy Multiple Frigates, Destroyers. If Still left, then Comes ABM. very less chance that it will breach all 3.

We will have Multiple Frigates equipped with ABM then Multiple Destroyers then Nucleur Submarine then AC Carrier with 15-25 AC Fighter + BM & CM + ABM again.

Pakistan don't even have Destroyers, ABM, Nucleur Submarine. AC Carrier comes later. Carrier Killer is useless due to 3-5 layer of Shield.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

People still missed the concept of "carrier kill missile"

To Destroy AC carrier You need to Destroy Multiple Frigates, Destroyers. If Still left, then Comes ABM. very less chance that it will breach all 3.

We will have Multiple Frigates equipped with ABM then Multiple Destroyers then Nucleur Submarine then AC Carrier with 15-25 AC Fighter + BM & CM + ABM again.

Pakistan don't even have Destroyers, ABM, Nucleur Submarine. AC Carrier comes later. Carrier Killer is useless due to 3-5 layer of Shield.

What so hard, a submarine, takes out a frigate , and hides underwater , and then you follow it up with sea hugging cruise missile attack on Destroyers, and finally launch 10 carrier killers

Nice reef underwater

Not to mention , We can just use a stealth plane , to fly a tactical nuke over the carrier and drop a present

Becasue the carrier travels with so much luggage one big move and all the assets go down under water


It would be ideal for india to keep all the stuff close proximity one big strike and all under water

 

[Safriz]

People still missed the concept of "carrier kill missile"

To Destroy AC carrier You need to Destroy Multiple Frigates, Destroyers. If Still left, then Comes ABM. very less chance that it will breach all 3.

We will have Multiple Frigates equipped with ABM then Multiple Destroyers then Nucleur Submarine then AC Carrier with 15-25 AC Fighter + BM & CM + ABM again.

Pakistan don't even have Destroyers, ABM, Nucleur Submarine. AC Carrier comes later. Carrier Killer is useless due to 3-5 layer of Shield.

yes you remind me of the only aircraft carrier i ever saw in reality.USS INDEPENDANCE.
its been decommissioned years ago but as you say it wasnt alone.There we two destroyers . one ahead and behind it.and four large helicopters scanning the area