What's new

Should Pakistan go with ICBMs after NATO strike

T-Rex, i have heard rumours as of 2009-10 that Pakistan has successfully developed a new ICBM, but i am not sure if they can test the missile, may be something like cold test?? i am not well versed in this technology, so someone else might be able to chime in... i wont be surprised if these rumours are true.

Rumours are of little value to the people in Pakistan at the moment when they need solid assurance from the state that Pakistan is not going to become the next savory dish for uncle sam after Iraq .
 
.
Pakistan does not have knowledge to build ICBM, they got missile technology enough to counter India. China will not share ICBM technology with them.

You can build it, but it will take time.
Sir Pakistan is already working on ICBM and yes Pakistan Should go for ICBM and should make sure it has the fastest speed so if fired it can't be stopped and that is the only way to tell NATO to not to mess with us
 
.
Seriously what your going to nuke the US ? Wake up and smell the coffee, even if someone in Pakistan is stupid enough to launch a missile towards the States -

a) It wont make it there
b) that will be the end of Pakistan.
c) you will cause your own destruction.

you really think an ICBM will scare the US, please stop with all this.
 
.
US will destroy those ICBM in mid ocean and if they are carrying nukes, then good bye to close-by countries as there may be a tsunami no one would ever expect. I don't think ICBM will be a deterrent
U know if the ICBM is intercepted on the Atlantic ocean then the Tsunami will overrun the whole NY state, Washington DC, Masacussets , Virginia state . I mean the states touching the Atlantic ocean will be completely under water...If U are in NY then U will be under water and can't use ure internet, sorry for that..... Plues we will make sure that the speed of our ICBM will supercede the speed of the mid coarse interceptors so that they be litterally unstoppabe by any defence shield......Insha-Allah.....:smokin:
Russia already made it , "their Missile Iskander" and we working on it.... We will test it when we will require it to show the world....Insha-Allah.......:eek:
 
. . . .
Seriously what your going to nuke the US ? Wake up and smell the coffee, even if someone in Pakistan is stupid enough to launch a missile towards the States -

a) It wont make it there
b) that will be the end of Pakistan.
c) you will cause your own destruction.
you really think an ICBM will scare the US, please stop with all this.
Hey why U so much scared of oure ICBMs????....Oh! now I know that cuz U live next to US in Canada, so U think our ICBM might loose the path and hit ure home there......:D
 
.
If Iran with no nukes and no ICBMs can scare the sh!t out of the US why not?

when did Iran scare the **** out of the US, please stop believing what you read on this forum, the reality is quite different. The Iran issue is way more complex that what most Pakistan pan it out to be.

---------- Post added at 09:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------

Hey why U so much scared of ure ICBMs????....Oh! now I know that cuz U live next to US in Canada, so U think our ICBM might loose the path and hit ure home there......:D

sure bomb Canada as well, just dont hit my city :)
 
.
Seriously what your going to nuke the US ? Wake up and smell the coffee, even if someone in Pakistan is stupid enough to launch a missile towards the States -

a) It wont make it there
b) that will be the end of Pakistan.
c) you will cause your own destruction.

you really think an ICBM will scare the US, please stop with all this.

Our purpose is not to scare but to protect our country from all possible threats.
plus if you think that we will cause own destruction then you are a fool ,

hypothetically speaking if that happens we will not be going alone :devil:
 
. .
Modern ICBMS have decoys to fool any incoming interceptors and also have rapid movements during their terminal phase. and then to add more misery to interceptors they are moving at 8 to 12 km per second during terminal phase, very hard to it. i am sure technology has come a long way after gulf war 1 but nevertheless, ICMS have improved their capabilities as well. its an interesting dilemma !!

you do know that the U.S. can detect the difference between decoys and warheads right?
 
.
U know if the ICBM is intercepted on the Atlantic ocean then the Tsunami will overrun the whole NY state, Washington DC, Masacussets , Virginia state . I mean the states touching the Atlantic ocean will be completely under water...If U are in NY then U will be under water and can't use ure internet, sorry for that..... Plues we will make sure that the speed of our ICBM will supercede the speed of the mid coarse interceptors so that they be litterally unstoppabe by any defence shield......Insha-Allah.....:smokin:
Russia already made it , "their Missile Iskander" and we working on it.... We will test it when we will require it to show the world....Insha-Allah.......:eek:

A nuke in the middle of the Atlantic will drown the east coast? Go study some physics, inshalla...
 
.
may be Islamic(ICBM) :pakistan:



PS: i am a muslim but i don't want any destructive weapon in my hands at all...:meeting:

Pyaar do Pyaar lo :kiss3:

Tera Gujraaty bhai loge tera pyaar ki daam de deya!
 
.
A nuke in the middle of the Atlantic will drown the east coast? Go study some physics, inshalla...
I guess U need to check the world map and see what states of US are touching the Atlantic ocean then U will know what I mean.....:smokin:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom