Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
U know if the ICBM is intercepted on the Atlantic ocean then the Tsunami will overrun the whole NY state, Washington DC, Masacussets , Virginia state . I mean the states touching the Atlantic ocean will be completely under water...If U are in NY then U will be under water and can't use ure internet, sorry for that..... Plues we will make sure that the speed of our ICBM will supercede the speed of the mid coarse interceptors so that they be litterally unstoppabe by any defence shield......Insha-Allah.....
Russia already made it , "their Missile Iskander" and we working on it.... We will test it when we will require it to show the world....Insha-Allah.......
The other nations, which use to develop the nuclear weapons, only have the purpose to defend themselves from the US aggression.
Well, China is no superpower for sure, but China has nothing to lose if Pakistan has ICBM, but US is a different matter.
I am sure someone with engineering background can comprehend what i am going to say. Pakistan has aleady produced 2 stage MRBM. Therefore, they have worked on separation of first stage from second stage, so second stage rocket can take the missile to intended destination with iits ordinance. Now having said, most of the ICBMs are three stage rockets. I am sure Pakistan can achieve that in short period of time. Pakistan developed 2 stage rockets in 10 years, and getting to ICBMs wont be a difficult task. Also, if you look at the timeline, Pakistan first came out of two stage MRBM in 1998, based on what i see, and understand, i am sure they must have worked on a prototype in lasts 13 years.
Anyone agrees or disagrees with this general timeline?
what if after this China provides nukes to cuba,bolivia,venezula,iran,syria and hamas???
Well Chinatiger1986,If you Arm Pakistan with ICBMs,you are directly endangering the security of USA while violating MTCR.What if USA decide to pay back with same coin and it violates NPT and provides Nukes to Vietnam,Taiwan and other countries hostile to china,reognises tibet as independent country,provides missile and nuke tech to India and probably forms a Nato like organisation in south asia.
You have a lot to lose if you provide ICBM to any country.Your is a classical middle kingdom syndrome resulting from unresolved Inferiority complex(refer to a good psychology book on Alderian Psychology to undestand what inferiority complex means.most school boys here does not understand it's meaning and rant on basisi of their preconceived notions).You think of US as a punching bag which cannot retaliate.
breach?
we all know who sold nukes to israel.....grow up son and stop buttering americans.
america has aggravated everything so far on this globe.....why dosent harame obama and NATO take action against illegal israeli settlements?why not no fly zone over occupied kashmir but libya??
son i am a Pakistani but living in japan.........apply your mind somewhere else....you indians are only good in buttering and stealing Pakistani history.
obama is a harame and i repeat it ...cause he dosent has any morals....he should enforce a no fly zone over occupied kashmir just like libya if he is an honest man.
You don't need ICBM's to strike India, every other, and realistically, we have no other adversary in the world. So , in short, no.
Well, the US has ICBM's, Russia/England/China etc all have ICBM's.....similarly we can have ICBM's but not to threaten our friends, only to threaten our enemies and the US is a close ally
Transforming an IRBM into an ICBM is TECHNOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.The differention between IRBM and ICBM is not only that of Range but also of maximum altitude and speed attained.A parallel with rocket tech would help.
India has a space program which is dependent on PSLV and GSLV as launch Vehical.PSLV is a proven workhorse that is used to launch Sun synchronus satellites but it is incapable of placing a satellite in Geostationary orbit(with strap on motor it can and then also only satellites with low weight) because of low low thrust/weight ratio and impulse it provides.This problem is solved by using cryogenic engines which provides maximum Impulse.
Similarly to convert an IRBM into ICBM you could take one of the two paths.
1.Strap on a cryogenic engine on an IRBM.
This step is a technological impossibility for pakistan given the fact that pakistan has not even developed a basic rocket an Cryogenic tech is very complicated.Making Nukes is a walk in park compared to it.also you need to change initial stages also to accomodate it.Add to this the fact that cryogenic engine has to be primed in real time an under controlled conditions,any ICBM site with ICBM's would become a turkey shoot for it's enemies.
2.Change the propellants used in IRBM to increase it's specific Impulse .Well that is definition of a whole new missile system.
So by incorporating more stages and strap ons you could convert a 4500Km range missile into 5500Km range one but if you want to make a true ICBM with excess of 8000Km range you have to start from scratch.
Pakistan coming out with a true ICBM even in a decade is pure Fanboi fantasy as if such a covert program was there pakistan would have been testing the constituents of ICBM and the whole of the world would have known.such a program is not possible to hide.You have to test millions of parts with each single bolt having a specific tolerance limit which is true for any new technology ,the tell tale sign of many of which could not be hidden.Only way to at lest have a semblance of secrecy is to test portions of ICBM in Rocket launches which pakistan does not have.