Azad Jammu and Kashmir has seen minimal immigration since it became part of Pakistan. How, do you suggest, that we get the people who moved there in 1950 out. How can you say that they are not "Azad Kashmiris". This is why I said there must be a two-way freeze.
The usual attempt to obfuscate. Without trying to explain why you calling a part of Kashmir, 'Azad', doesn't make it so, I will let you chew on the Northern Areas.
Predictably the Northern Areas and the area gifted to the 'taller than mountain, deeper than sea', friend of yours, escape the cognition of Pakistanis. As if, those do not exist.
Hey, how about we start migrating to Kashmir and then 60 years later, in 2070, we would put a 'two-way freeze' and feign our inability to 'get the people who moved there' in 2010, out.
What do you think, since 1947, IHK hasn't seen massive amounts of immigrants move in? Just the families of your half million plus soldiers are overwhelming the area. Simple matter is, the security situation of these regions has kept them from over-populating over the years, hence, they are still largely the way they were in 47.
Prior to 1987, there wasn't any insurgency that required more army presence than usual. What do you think stopped us from diluting the indigenous population then? O wait, our Constitution prevented us from doing that.
Besides, the families of army personals, who are themselves not indigenous residents of Kashmir, are not considered as 'permanent' residents of Kashmir. Hence they can't cast their votes in any election held there.
As a Think Tank, your lack of knowledge is appalling.
And in any case, you were supposed to hold the plebiscite in 1949, before any immigration took place. Why should the Kashmiris suffer for your imperfections?
Kashmiris are paying the price of your misdeeds. If your people hadn't infiltrated Kashmir, Kashmiris would have been a happy bunch of people by now. Leave that aside. If your people were so concerned about Kashmir and Kashmirs, why didn't they vacate the areas they were supposed to vacate during that time.
Quit shedding those crocodile tears.
But yeah, anybody who speaks for the rights of Kashmiris is evil, that's the general aura I've seen coming from your brethren. I don't doubt for a minute that if I were saying the opposite, that you would consider me to be a saint. I have no interes in justifying my choices to people who are too blind to see beyond their own ambitions. I was talking about Kashmiris, you tried to make it all about me. Conratulations! You've been nominated as the troll of the day!
It was
you who tried to explain how plebiscite should work. It was based on
your understanding. Hence it was made 'all about
you'. Who do you think I should have directed my queries to?
Nice attempt to deflect. But next time, try harder.