pakdefender
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 5,671
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
yes india should , what is she waitng for
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Nuclear Winter a Myth or Fact?
read my posts in that thread
I am not even talking about long term effects, of nuclear detonations
a large scale counter value exchange will result in millions of casualties, and the major enemy ordinary people face after such a nuclear war is not fallout, nor nuclear winter, but state of anarchy, a place without functioning government is very dangerous.
imagine an India without any Government
A nuclear war will not involve endless exchanges of nukes.
It also has to do with the ability of a nation to sustain damage and its ability to recoup. By its depth, size and other factors India has a much better chance of Pakistan that stretches in a North - South direction.
yes india should , what is she waitng for
If Pakistan manages to unload every single nuke it has on the top major cities of India, it would kill 5% of Indias population or about 50 - 60 million people and set India back by 10 years. 10 years is nothing for a civilization and a people.
dont feed these ''kinky'' indians......ask MODs to delete or close this gibberish.How'd you come to that conclusion? Please elaborate......
How'd you come to that conclusion? Please elaborate......
Im not getting paid to feed you my research. Why dont you do the impact analysis of the scenario I presented and come up with a number.
You are not paid to spew bullshit on the forum but you're doing that just fine. So either be prepared to produce sources to back up your shit or be prepared to gobble it back up.
Thats your assessment. I am not here to change your mind or perspective. I feel safe that many Pakistanis feel a false sense of security with their nukes. Good luck with when you decide to use them.
Which basically means you quoted a load of self-made pseudo-scientific numbers and now that you have been confronted about it and have nothing to say in your defence, you're going to swallow up your pride and try to detach from the discussion.
You're new here and I guess you don't know how to interact on a forum, the rule is simple. If you make a preposterous claim, be prepared to have a solid source behind it.
Or, its quite possible that you just don't know squat about nukuler weapons.