malikahmed91279
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Jf-17 is a 4th generation aircraft, and this bird replace our 3rd generation aircraft perfectly with our need at low cost, I'm talking about a lost cost 5th generation aircraft, like in price of 50 million dollar each bird, we can build 4.5 generation multi role fighter in 32 million dollar each, I'm sure we can get a beast in 50million, Turkey can also provide technical help to us, so do china as I hear about j-2xwhat's your point boy?
I also was interested to start a discussion about twin engine jf-17 or a batter single jf-17 for MMRCA, Pakistan should start a new project based on jf-17 research, with better aviation, like better radar, more payload, and longer range, coz we need a fighter who will play with gripen or f-16 blk 70,if it's difficult for us to get a better engine (120 minimum) then we can easily go for a twin engine (60-65 each) jf-17 aircraft, with a different name like (Jinnah or jibril) my fav, its a better option then j-10 or j-16,because if we don't go with jf-17 research, then there's no benefit of totExisting
View attachment 381980
J-18 would be nice
Twin Engine Thunder , throwing the idea out there
Same Thunder but modified to have 2 Engines
Just need minor revision on the lateral half of the Plane
The rest of the plane can remain as it , Avionics , Weapon's package etc
View attachment 382016
View the Top view , what I did was without changing too much of the plane , I just reused the rear space which presently fits 1 Engine , to place 2 Engines side by side. Same scale 2 engines in given space at rear , and you can see techncially you can position 2 Engines side by side at back
May be the airintake would need to be widen to accomodate more flow of oxygen/air into engines
Certainly the core body can be modified to house 2 Engines with some minor revision of structural design of core body