Shia families attacked for opposing Triple Talaq & for wearing ‘Hindu-like’ sacred thread on wrists

[Roybot]

You mean they don't go to a court when they want to divorce?

Nope.

They can even divorce their wife by sending messages on WhatsApp, sending a courier, or just say talaq talaq talaq on skype.

 

[A.A. Khan]

Hindu Marriage Act 1955 is a biased law where hindu women cannot file lawsuit on legal grounds and need to be filed jointly, hindu women can also be kept away from financial support and the case can drag on for years if the hindu male does'nt take part in the plaintiff proceedings. Hindu succession Act 1956 where hindu women have little onr no rights to inherit property, they were being amended in 2010 but the Lok Sabha failed to pass. To get divorce as per Hindu Marriage law is the most difficult harassing arduous process for a woman but these indian hindus not discussing this shows there 'support' for divorce is basically muslim hate and ways to destroy Muslim Personal Laws which were guaranteed by Indian State when muslims refused to got to Pakistan, asked for a set of law protections which were granted in limited terms in making of AIMPLB.

 

[patman]

Triple talaq is against human rights.

 

[Tshering22]

You mean they even don't go to a court when they want to divorce?

No they don't.

Now you see the problem?

This law is approved by the Muslim law board in India for muslims. So it is misused by the day.

Many muslim men have divorced their wives over SMSes and Whatsapp messages. Like in less than 5 seconds!

Hindu Marriage Act 1955 is a biased law where hindu women cannot file lawsuit on legal grounds and need to be filed jointly, hindu women can also be kept away from financial support and the case can drag on for years if the hindu male does'nt take part in the plaintiff proceedings. Hindu succession Act 1956 where hindu women have little onr no rights to inherit property, they were being amended in 2010 but the Lok Sabha failed to pass. To get divorce as per Hindu Marriage law is the most difficult harassing arduous process for a woman but these indian hindus not discussing this shows there 'support' for divorce is basically muslim hate and ways to destroy Muslim Personal Laws which were guaranteed by Indian State when muslims refused to got to Pakistan, asked for a set of law protections which were granted in limited terms in making of AIMPLB.

You are taking the laws which have been changed over half a dozen times since the time you have quoted the regulation which started initially.

Women of dharmic communities can own equal share to property, claim divorce, and even question uneven distribution of land or assets by either parents or on husband's side.

My point is, there have been wrong laws and systems passed before. But our side continues to reform and make changes, meanwhile you are stuck in the past.

Please update yourself with the new laws before raising a debate.

 

[footmarks]

So a muslim man can keep 3 wives, and if he want more, he can say talaq 3 times and can again go for wife shopping. whoever wrote that law, must have had a good life.

 

[RoadRunner401]

LOL, Isn't it funny? how an attack in west by terrorist is Islamic terrorist attack, attacks in India are Sunni Muslims attacking Shia Muslims, yet if Hindu attacks another Hindu or westerner attacks or kill in masses only the names of the person are mentioned not his or her religion or sect.

 

[ranjeet]

LOL, Isn't it funny? how an attack in west by terrorist is Islamic terrorist attack, attacks in India are Sunni Muslims attacking Shia Muslims, yet if Hindu attacks another Hindu or westerner attacks or kill in masses only the names of the person are mentioned not his or her religion or sect.

No, it isn't funny. You are confusing terrorist attack with fight between people of two different sect.

 

[RoadRunner401]

So a muslim man can keep 3 wives, and if he want more, he can say talaq 3 times and can again go for wife shopping. whoever wrote that law, must have had a good life.

Not sure about India and what's going on there, but Muslim men can't just divorce without a reason, second settlement is decided at the time of marriage ceremony in case of divorce, which you must pay, third one must have the financial and other abilities to provide for his wife before one can think of another (second wife) and even after that one must have (first wife) her permission before you can take another wife.

I have made it as simple as I can, but there are other provisions before one can proceed with another marriage.

 

[footmarks]

Not sure about India and what's going on there, but Muslim men can't just divorce without a reason, second settlement is decided at the time of marriage ceremony in case of divorce, which you must pay, third one must have the financial and other abilities to provide for his wife before one can think of another (second wife) and even after that one must have (first wife) her permission before you can take another wife.

I have made it as simple as I can, but there are other provisions before one can proceed with another marriage.

Fair enough, then. Religious laws (infact all laws )are for people who want to live a just life. others find loopholes to use them for their own good. THis is what is happening in Muslims in India, and muslim women are not happy with it. Any country can not remain silent if some religious "personal" laws are being misused. Good thing with religious laws is that they don't need to be changed, you just need to change the interpretation of them to reform. Clearly, AIMPLB is unable (or not willing, given their orthodox, rigid and patriarchal order) to do that. Nobody knows what god, or its messenger actually said, the books written after can suffer from writer's bias, we should not take everything written in the holy books word by word.

 

[RoadRunner401]

No, it isn't funny. You are confusing terrorist attack with fight between people of two different sect.

No I am not, if you can't read and understood what's written that's not my fault

Show me a headline on any media site where it reads Indian Muslims were attacked by Brehamin Hindus sects

 

[A.A. Khan]

@footmarks Hindus need to repeal their own anti-female Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and Hindu Succession Act 1956 to make an example before attacking minorities and poking their nose in other business. Hindus are not affected by this law yet are interfering which shows the reality of india, a hindu taliban state.

 

[Stag112]

Intolerant Hindus!

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Shias & Sunnis having differences amounts to Divide & Rule ?

If so, Pakistan is forever in that mode.


I dont see how an NGO can issue a Fatwa

In Pak we have Muslim family laws.

Triple divorce isn't considered among Shias and hence according to Pak law it's void.

Also divorce is a long procedure in Pak, which includes court, union council, reconciliation time period etc.

In short "to each his own".

Intolerant Hindus!

Very tolerating indeed;

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/musl...th-for-being-in-love-with-hindu-woman.488054/

In this month alone people were lynched for transporting cows,love,riding horse while being low caste .. among other wonderful tolerant things.

 

[ranjeet]

No I am not, if you can't read and understood what's written that's not my fault

Show me a headline on any media site where it reads Indian Muslims were attacked by Brehamin Hindus sects

Brehamin Hindus sects? What's that?

 

[haviZsultan]

It pains me that shias and sunnis cannot work together in the world. Everywhere we seem to be completely divided. Its a sad reality, an unfortunate situation. We need to build unity in the world between shia and sunni. Saudi and Iran at other ends also has polarized the situation. I hope and wish for the best. We should all just call ourselves muslim and nothing more, nothing less.