What's new

Shenyang J-15 aircraft carrier-based aircraft

:-)

J-15 serial 116, 119, 120, 121 & 122

J-15 serial 119 120 121 122 - 20170703.jpg
J-15 serial 120 122 - 20170703.jpg
J-15 serial 121 122 - 20170703.jpg
J-15 serial 116 119 - 20170703.jpg
J-15 serial 120 - 20170703.jpg
J-15 serial 121 - 20170703.jpg
 
. . . .
Interesting update from Huitong !

It was rumored in November 2016 that a J-15T took off for the first time from a ground-based electromagnetic catapult (EMALS). The latest rumor (April 2017) suggested that the production of J-15A ended after 3 batches of 24 units for the Type 001 aircraft carrier. It is expected to be followed by the improved J-15B (?) which will feature a new AESA radar developed by the 607 Institute.
- Last Updated 7/3/17

http://chinese-military-aviation.blogspot.de/p/fighters-ii.html#J-15


????
 
. . .
Some very nice J-15A CGs ....
Is the number 911 coincidental?

This makes sense since officially CV-16 is just a training ship, no point giving it state of the art AESA radars.
Given how little difference there is between CV-16 and her newbuilt Chinese sister, it is safe to consider both fully capable carriers.
 
.
Is the number 911 coincidental?


Given how little difference there is between CV-16 and her newbuilt Chinese sister, it is safe to consider both fully capable carriers.
In some sense yes, but I guess Chinese leaders still do not have pride in a foreign vessel being China's first aircraft carrier, hence there is tendency to relegate it to a 'training' ship.
 
.
In some sense yes, but I guess Chinese leaders still do not have pride in a foreign vessel being China's first aircraft carrier, hence there is tendency to relegate it to a 'training' ship.
So, it is just a cosmetic term, a symbolic issue. Because, for a training ship, it is remarkably well armed and equipped, pretty much equal (with few exceptions) to the homebuilt follow-on.

And the relationship between the two ships is not like this:

DSC06093.jpg


1200px-Leopard_2_A5_der_Bundeswehr.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
So, it is just a cosmeting term, a symbolic issue. Because, for a training ship, it is remarkably well armed and equipped, pretty much equal (with few exceptions) to the homebuilt follow-on.
Yes, symbolism means a lot to us Chinese. We are too proud to accept a freaking refurbished Ukrainian vessel as the FIRST AIRCRAFT CARRIER. It has got to be Chinese made with at least Chinese made planes although cloned in many facets.:partay:. The swadeshi psyche among Chinese is very strong.
 
. .
That's a cut out from this one (J-15T), from Huitong's site, right?
J-15A.jpg


J-15A.jpg


http://chinese-military-aviation.blogspot.nl/p/fighters-ii.html

See also http://errymath.blogspot.com/2016/11/catobar-variant-j-15t-successfully.html#.WVvfo-nnqUk

China flight testing modified J-15 for CATOBAR operations
Richard D Fisher Jr, Washington DC and Gabriel Dominguez, London and Sean O'Connor, Indianapolis - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
21 September 2016
http://www.janes.com/article/64001/china-flight-testing-modified-j-15-for-catobar-operations
p1685960.jpg


Here it is called: Chinese J-15A prototype featuring nose-wheel catapult launch assembly.
chinese-j-15a_650x400_41476175982.jpg

http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/china-racing-ahead-of-india-in-aircraft-carrier-development-1472835
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom