What's new

Sheikh Mujib brutality

.
what about before 1972? like Sheikh Mujib beat parliament speaker Shahed Ali to death with a chair during East Pakistan time

@ No ? I disgree with you. According to my source Sk Mujib threw a paper weight (made of stone glass) that hit the head of speaker Shahed Ali and fell down. Later on people threw chair and other items once fighting broke among the MP's.

@ Speaker Shahed Ali was among the members of Jokto Front. 290 members out of 300 all belongs to Awami Leaque and like minded parties.
 
.
@Mattrixx i see your avatar is now of a spear guy right from the epics of Mahabharat. suits you better :cheers:

Its zeus actually. I like these mythology. After some how following Mahabharat, I feel that deception wins, which I dont like.
But it was a epic story with some interesting things.
 
.
.
.
Self declared killer of Siraj Sikdar and father of nation



Siraj Sikdar was killed infront of Sk Mujib by his direct order,Mujib is a self declared killer of a political figure who has protest against the corruption, nepotism and suppression by Sk Mujib his relatives and loyalist the famous Rakkhi bahini.

Mujib did not want independance of Bangladesh ,he only wanted to be PM of Pakistan by doing so he would not have made any change to poor people of the then East Pakistan rather enrich himself again through corruption and nepotism.So Mujib is technically not the founding father of Bangladesh.

Ofcourse he is a politician and that too by profession not by passion.

The way Joinal Hazari or Falu Mia has become a figure in politic Mujib initial role was as a thug leader.

He is the only in the family with fame and money which he had earned through the most lucrative profession politics of corruption and exploitation in his younger days.

People of Mujib's time always regards Mujib as a fist fighter, left hand of Sharwardy used mainly to terrorize opponents inside the party, opportunist, a low grade ambitious thug come leader.

Politics has given Mujib wealth popularity Power and place in history ,he has not contributed much accept exploitation of the innocent people with false promises, earn money through corruption and illegal connections.

So what has Sk Mujib sacrifice for the country. Mujib is lucky to be in the high middle class I am sure his father was a poor maybe honorable average Bangali man.Mujib had bypassed lot of more efficient and qualified leaders of his time both in regards to educational background and smartness of his time and honest contribution to community and country.

Politic made Mujib rich which was his ambition not through proper channel but by flattery, thugism and manipulation.

Compare him to political leaders like Mr Buddodev the chief minister of West Bengal his family status

financially hasn't changed at all through politics , he came to politics through his educational background and proper promotion in the party.

Mujib has not sacrificed for the country but the country had to suffered a lot.More qualified were forcefully removed by the Mujib conspiracy who would have put Bangladesh in much better position than now where it stands now after 36 yrs of independance.

With the alleged background Mujib don't stand a chance to be a national leader but a national thug.

We don't want to make an self declared killer of Siraj Sikdar to be our father of nation.

Leader lives in the heart of people Mujib has never earned that honor or deserved it or cared for it at all.

After Mujib's death people celebrated with joy because Mujib died as a dictator and corrupt leader who brought more poverty and disaster for the people inorder to establish his dynastic rule and personal thug life style.

Today I am happy to see daughter who has come forward and reopened the suppressed murder case of her father a talented leader and meritorious Engineer from a more sophisticated family.

http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=157479

Siraj Sikdar was a controversial figure, a radical communist to be exact, similar to Col Taher. However, both of them have enough accomplishments under their belt to be termed as national heroes of Bangladesh.
 
.
Siraj Sikdar was a controversial figure, a radical communist to be exact, similar to Col Taher. However, both of them have enough accomplishments under their belt to be termed as national heroes of Bangladesh.

We may not agree with their ideology and their decisions, but there is little doubt that they loved their country and both were from good family background and excellent students. That same thing could not be said about gunda demagogue Mujib.
 
.
We may not agree with their ideology and their decisions, but there is little doubt that they loved their country and both were from good family background and excellent students. That same thing could not be said about gunda demagogue Mujib.

Yes, they loved their country, but the Jamaati Mullahs did not. So I always suggest these filthy groups should have been killed, instead.
 
.
If the SM really was that bad why do so much of the population still revere him? Even the most ardent opposition accepts that Sheikh Mujib is father of the nation and AL commands at least 30% of votes all the time. No point trying to fan flames when there is no fire.

Its a inherent awami trait to lie and u r no exception. How is mujib popular? He is popular only among AL supporters and AL supporter doesn't equate to being BDs no matter how much your awami intoxicated brain wants to believe that. How about accepting this reality and then growing a thick skin to criticism and not go berserk on historical facts and truth? But then again u guys facist and bakshali by nature destined to go the way of the dinosaurs.
And which opposition accepts mujib as the Father of the nation? U seem to be a ignorant british awami leaguer who doesn't know much abt his/her country of origin. :lol:
 
.
SK Mujib should have allowed the proud people of Bangladesh finish off all the jamati razakars. It was a big mistake from him.
 
.
There was no Bangladesh in 1970, only Indian trained Mukti Bahini terrorist destroying East Pakistan followed by an Indian invasion in 1971.

So my Bangladeshi brother, I'll ask you for the second time, what was the Bangladeshi/Pakistani GDP in 1972-1975 and what was it in 2013? Was the gap bigger in 1972 or in 2013.

Pakistan-BangladeshGDP1972-2013-1.png


Source of the above data can be found here: List of countries by past and future GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's not a trick question so con't be scared or shy to speak the truth my brother.

I will answer it, because no one wants to take a shot. In 43 years that gap is still the same. That shows that BD has failed utterly in reducing the GDP gap and proving to the world that they are better off after separation. If my BD friends are truthful then they will see what we both are seeing. Number don't lie but you can twist it to justify your argument.
 
.
Are you listening to yourself right now? did you even read my post? The opinion that BD is practically a client state is my own, but it is based upon events reported by neutral sources. The last elections were proof of just how much penetration India has in BD's government. There is no denying that BD-Indian relations have moved passed "friendly".

I don't give a shit what the Jamaatis say. War mongering? What war mongering? I don't give a shit what happens to BD, it's your problem, not mine. You and I both know the truth, but the only difference is that while you deny it, I'm acknowledge it and am indifferent to it, because it does not affect me.

Why do not you blame Begum Zia's BNP for the one sided election? It is that stupid woman who fell into a AL trap and boycotted the election. India supports more an AL govt in BD than a Jamaat infested BNP govt. It is very natural, but you cannot cite this phenomenon a proof of your claim that BD-India relaionship has passed over the friendship stage.
 
. .
SK Mujib should have allowed the proud people of Bangladesh finish off all the jamati razakars. It was a big mistake from him.
do you think the CPI should allow all the proud Maoist patriots of India to finish off their opposition?

Yes, they loved their country, but the Jamaati Mullahs did not. So I always suggest these filthy groups should have been killed, instead.
which country are you talking about here? India? JeI opposed the 1971 Indian annexation for what? you think you can change the meaning of patriot or the basic expectations from a nation's citizen?

it's you who thinks a citizens' duty was to help an enemy country invade their own country, if they happened to disagree with the government. JeI was the opposite of that and always supported the territorial and political integrity of the BD-East Pakistani landmass.
 
Last edited:
.
Damn! You Jamatis are stupid.

In order to finish off opposition, you should have capability to do so. Sheikh Mujib had that ability after independence. Maoists are saving their asses in forest and are killed like mad dog if they try venture out of them.

And who is CPI to allow ,or stop them, They got zero seats in 2014 lok sabha elections.
Sheikh Mujib would have committed the atrocity if he did not get into the fight within the leftist forces that India and Soviet Union propped up. Sheikh Mujib still did commit atrocities but on a different people than the ones you are showing so much violent bigotry towards
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom