Senior IB officers accused of having links with terrorists & foreign agencies

[El Sidd]

like the saying goes , hope is easy ,math is hard


which means , it exists in many forms

But we are by design a computing machine

 

[Mentee]

But we are by design a computing machine

but our text book board insists that we are Pakistanis

 

[El Sidd]

but our text book board insists that we are Pakistanis

Then make that mathematical assumption.

@HAKIKAT he may help you understand

 

[BHarwana]

@BHarwana check that topic !

sir nothing here officer na chuti nahi di us na darkhast thook di. lol. Ye roz ka mamla hai. Terrorist in IB protection, lol
topic is miss leading the text say no action taken topic says IB protecting terrorist. Safahat ka masala also added.

 

[The Eagle]

correct , IB chief stayed as Nawaz guest for 4 days in London and backed before the arrival of Nawaz, all of sudden this news pop on Dawn. But this report should be fully investigated.

More onto same, this does ends here at this point. Roots are long like what is Jindal and NS connections, what is being kept undisclosed from public in JIT report during Panama Case which in my personal opinion may hold all such information including NS Family investment in Israeli Firms etc, the connections of enemy agencies under the umbrella of so-called business contracts and investments so all in all, what appears to be is not what it is but at some point truth will come out and now seems like the time has come.

What happened here actually is that department is not culprit but the culprit could be any person or HoD that somehow was regarded with posting at favourite office for personal gains and support to run family politics as well as business. While considering such facts or observations, one must keep department aside and evaluate/ investigate such issue w.r.t. culprits or a person that brought agency into this mess.

 

[HAIDER]

I could be wrong but somehow, heard that IB is under pressure w.r.t. securing NS. A political fight that I think, a family actually utilizing I.B for personal gains against the country. I am off the opinion that whatever was discussed w.r.t. I.B role for protecting N.S/PMLn government, seems like it is a counter attack on behest of family to demoralize the forces as well as towing the same line that we heard from FM & others for which, they were criticized widely. I hope that superiors and concern authority will bring forward the truth hidden behind this criminal act and deliberate declaration for creating more trouble and hurdles.

From another aspect, we have been discussing that how PMLn has been protecting extremist fictions in Punjab and did not let the Rangers to take over and deal with them. These criminals were hired and supported for their services during the days of elections as well as to keep influence of political elites/ruling party.

Considering the above two facts, in my opinion, defamation of Forces and Country could be the point of such statement so that PMLn which is in trouble for its corruption and all, can survive yet blaming Pakistan indirectly by accusing Intel Agencies like this. However, reading the details actually transpire that how Prime Minister (N.S) who by law was controlling the I.B, actually involved in all this and such statement can prove a lot about his connections with hostile countries. If I am not missing something here, actually I.B was used by P.M for his personal links and gains yet this officer disclosed the same in Court.

More onto same, this does ends here at this point. Roots are long like what is Jindal and NS connections, what is being kept undisclosed from public in JIT report during Panama Case which in my personal opinion may hold all such information including NS Family investment in Israeli Firms etc, the connections of enemy agencies under the umbrella of so-called business contracts and investments so all in all, what appears to be is not what it is but at some point truth will come out and now seems like the time has come.

What happened here actually is that department is not culprit but the culprit could be any person or HoD that somehow was regarded with posting at favourite office for personal gains and support to run family politics as well as business. While considering such facts or observations, one must keep department aside and evaluate/ investigate such issue w.r.t. culprits or a person that brought agency into this mess.

It seems Saudi Qatari standoff will bring more bad news for Nawaz. More to come.

 

[Baghial]

Gen Bajwa needs to bang a few heads together and make sure this veritable arm of the Sharif family is reorganized under PATRIOTIC and capable professionals.Kudos Sir

You must be living on another planet if u r expecting any help from bajwa. He,s a diffrent branch of the same rotten tree

 

[Inception-06]

sir nothing here officer na chuti nahi di us na darkhast thook di. lol. Ye roz ka mamla hai. Terrorist in IB protection, lol
topic is miss leading the text say no action taken topic says IB protecting terrorist. Safahat ka masala also added.

Welcome in wonderland, dawn is reporting about ISI versus IB, check dawn news !!!

https://www.dawn.com/news/1361187/spy-agency-discredits-own-official

In its reply, IB claimed that the official seeking an Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) probe against senior bureau officials was a habitual litigant and had tried to tarnish the repute of the intelligence agency in the past as well.

During the hearing, the judge observed that there seemed to be a tug of war between ISI and IB, and even posed the same question to Barrister Masroor Shah, the petitioner’s counsel.

 

[niaz]

@niaz respected sir, sorry to trouble you but I would love to read your views on how to cleanup Pakistan from this internal fitna.
Please reply only if it is comfortable for you.

Raison D’etre or ‘reason of existence’ of any security organization is to keep the country safe. This implies that some of the IB Operatives would need to infiltrate groups they are supposed to watch else they would not be doing their job. Hence one comes across double agents or occasionally even triple agents

Therefore IB or any other security agency having links with the terrorist organizations & foreign agencies is a matter of routine. The question here is whether the some of the links act against the interest of the country and provide succour to the terrorists and / or act independently against the orders of the national gov’t? Such acts are normally classified as ‘Treachery’ and good governance demands that all traitors should be rooted out and punished.

However no country or security agency can claim to be totally free of moles and I am sure that Pakistan would have her share of Benedict Arnolds as well.

All I have come across in case of Pakistani security agencies thus far is mere ‘Hearsay.’ Accusations in case of ’Memogate’ were also more of a blame game. Therefore, it is not the question of being comfortable or not; no prudent person would condemn or pass judgement on a national organisation based on rumours alone

 

[wiseone2]

So he was working as a mole for foreign intelligence agencies. Good catch than. More the civilians in intelligence agencies more is the chance of compromise and security breach.

why are civilians more prone to compromise ?