Senior BLF Commander ambushed in Iran

[The Eagle]

Sir, news is authentic & verified, cannot give the source. But as I communicated the other day, we use PDF logo & OSINT tag for verified news only.....it comes through proper channel.....


Iran has one of the best Medical facilities....most of the Arabs either they will go to Iran or India for medical treatment.....
However in this case we are still not sure if this is Iran or some other country....

Remember that Achoo's hospital or even a western medical facility in Kabul? That's possible but we can say that he was sprayed while in Iran. Brotherly caught 3rd time in just span or wiyhin 2 months by such sprays and unknown.

On topic: The favour is coming back to these rats and their handlers as well. We promised them the same way tjey were feelong proud by sharing videos.

Godspeed and thanks to ALLAH for back to back successes.

 

[El Sidd]

if i didnt know the full context why do you think i was able to call you out so quickly on it??? dont be a cowardly Pakistani - callout Iran directly and openly, like you fellow brethren do.

I'll take your smarty pants comments as an admission i understand Iran better than you do. ur welcome.

Was he part of the Al Qaeda network sheltered by Iran or part of the nexus of human traffickers into Europe via Turkey?

 

[KediKesenFare3]

Dr. Allah??

 

[salarsikander]

A terror exporting nation as usual sheltering and harboring terrorists

Another name for Treachery = Khomenis Iran

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

That’s what I call guts....

 

[925boy]

A terror exporting nation as usual sheltering and harboring terrorists

Another name for Treachery = Khomenis Iran

Iran is playingh the "game " with Pakistan- they both have external interests and considerations that affect and influence their behavior towards neighbors..it goes both ways. WHen Pakistan shows Iran that it means business and had a solid strategy, Iran will back off...if you guys dont take of your people Iran will come in and start doing so...seriously.

 

[925boy]

Was he part of the Al Qaeda network sheltered by Iran or part of the nexus of human traffickers into Europe via Turkey?

No idea.

Yes thats why treacherous ugly people salves of khomeni were begging our pm to ask US to ease sanctions on them. LOL

Please "run your own race " and let Iran run hers...i can smell insecurities. If Iran is so crappy then just leave Iran alone. lol..seriously. but no, some of you will criticize Iran as if you are the US. your hands are stained too...my eyes are on the news 247 for info that confirms that so just wait...your govt is also using proxies for alot of its regional bidding...cant hide the truth.

 

[Sheepistanis]

terrorist sympathizer? remember ur from Pakistan bro. They found BIn Laden in your country. hypocrite.

Bin Laden was a Saudi not a Pakistani, get your facts right. Just as Iran facilitated an Indian terrorist, Commander Kulbushan Jadav to cross over into Pakistan, OBL sneaking into Pakistan was beyond it's control.

Your BLA terrorist requires of you to change his pee pan, better get to it, stop wasting time defending him on defence.pk when your warrior destined for hell is fighting for his life.

 

[El Sidd]

Bin Laden was a Saudi not a Pakistani, get your facts right. Just as Iran facilitated an Indian terrorist, Commander Kulbushan Jadav to cross over into Pakistan, OBL doing the same was beyond Pakistan's control.

Your BLA terrorist requires of you to change his pee pan, better get to it, stop wasting time defending him on defence.pk when your warrior destined for hell is fighting for his life.

do not tell him about bin laden being a state guest in Iran for years.

there is no reason to bring this up at all.

 

[Sheepistanis]

do not tell him about bin laden being a state guest in Iran for years.

there is no reason to bring this up at all.

The kid is probably under-aged for the task that has been handed over to him, better not burden him with more facts.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

The moozlamic republic of Iraon was never a friend of Pakistan . They wil continue to harbor Baloch terrorists and at the same time use Imam bargah network of Pakistan for praising Iranian greatness all the time .

Ironically, US goals in terms of 'Regime Change' in Iran align with Pakistan's longer term national security concerns.

Iran's influence over the world's Shia exists because of the standing of the Iranian religious leadership. The Iranian religious leadership has cleverly leveraged religious sentiment (through Shia reverence & respect for Shia religious sites and religious leadership) into support for the regime since they are one and the same. So long as the Iranian Mullah's continue to control the Iranian government, this is unlikely to change.

 

[El Sidd]

The kid is probably under-aged for the task that has been handed over to him, better not burden him with more facts.

i do not think he was aware of the task hence i go easy on him and just ruffle him up for fun

Ironically, US goals in terms of 'Regime Change' in Iran align with Pakistan's longer term national security concerns.

I highly doubt that.

Pakistan has no interest in regime changes. It has a state fundamental policy in this regard.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Makes you wonder if our establishment, specifically the military will finally muster up the courage to take the Iranians to task at the official level?

Pakistan cannot afford to open another front in the West. Some might argue that the 'front' with Iran is already open, but the Iranians can escalate significantly more. Pakistan can deal with it, but it'll come at a heavy cost of resources which will inevitably take a toll on the deployments on the Eastern front.

I highly doubt that.

Pakistan has no interest in regime changes. It has a state fundamental policy in this regard.

I didn't say Pakistan had an interest in regime change or was trying to effect one in Iran - I said that US goals for regime change in Iran dovetail with Pakistan's longer term national security interests. Without the Mullah's relinquishing control of the country, you're not going to see any major loss of Iranian influence over the world's Shia or a change in the Iranian regime's mindset.

 

[El Sidd]

I didn't say Pakistan had an interest in regime change or was trying to effect one in Iran - I said that US goals for regime change in Iran dovetail with Pakistan's longer term national security interests. Without the Mullah's relinquishing control of the country, you're not going to see any major loss of Iranian influence over the world's Shia or a change in the Iranian regime's mindset.

US goals in terms of 'Regime Change' in Iran align with Pakistan's longer term national security concerns.

Implied that it somehow aligns with Pakistan's security apparatus while on the contrary Pakistan has claimed Iran to be an extension of her own security and has given a clear statement regarding any such notion with respect to regime changes as a fundamental state policy.

Iran does not employ Shia influence as the sole narrative of her foreign policy and Pakistan does not have a problem with religious freedom in the country.

 

[Sheepistanis]

Pakistan cannot afford to open another front in the West. Some might argue that the 'front' with Iran is already open, but the Iranians can escalate significantly more. Pakistan can deal with it, but it'll come at a heavy cost of resources which will inevitably take a toll on the deployments on the Eastern front.

Conveying a stern message to Iran isn't as same as going to a full fledged war. Keeping in view the security challenges it continues to pose for Pakistan, Pakistan can no longer afford to play friendly neighbour with Iran when it's devious intentions are out in the open.


You deleting my post signifies exactly what it pointed out. Sorry but I will be raising that issue with the administrators.