What's new

Senators irked by India’s Iran ties, stalled nuclear trade

rama

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
610
Reaction score
0
WASHINGTON: India's continued engagement with Iran in the face of American pathology against Tehran and New Delhi's insistence on putting safety before commerce in nuclear energy trade surfaced as wrinkles in an otherwise smooth and upbeat assessment of US-India ties during the confirmation hearing of Nancy Powell, the US ambassador-nominee to India.

US Senators gushed about the growing closeness between Washington and New Delhi, a proposition supported by Ms Powell, but on a day India's foreign secretary Ranjan Mathai met Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other state department mandarins to present New Delhi's perspective on these and other issues, lawmakers did not hold back from expressing annoyance at the Indian stance on Iran and stalled nuclear trade with US

The sharpest censure came from New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez who virtually accused India, which is one of Iran's largest energy buyers, of ''rebuking (US-led) sanctions'' and ''looking for workarounds, including considering payments in gold and transactions that detour around'' Washington's move forestall Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

''For our sanctions to be effective, it's really crucial that all nations, particularly democratic nations like India, work together to confront Iran,'' Menendez said, urging Powell to convey to New Delhi that this is a ''policy priority'' and the US will not hesitate to take appropriate action under its law to enforce the sanctions, a step that will hurt Indian companies if they continue trading with Iran.

Powell was measured in her response, noting that Iran and India have a long tradition of trade across energy and other fields, but also noting twice that foreign secretary Mathai has indicated India's effort to diversify its energy sources and reduce Iranian oil imports to less than 10 per cent. She also pointed out that India had supported the US at the IAEA four times and it shared with Washington a desire to see a nonnuclear state in Iran.

''I think these are positive developments,'' she said, adding that ''our own efforts to support India in looking at other sources of energy will be a contributor to this.'' She however promised to spend time working with New Delhi on this subject.

Similarly, Powell also heard senatorial annoyance at India's nuclear liability bill, which veteran senator and disarmament pundit Richard Lugar said could frustrate the US nuclear industry's efforts to play a role in India's expanding nuclear power sector. Lugar said the bill's terms are ''fundamentally inconsistent'' with the liability regime that the international community is seeking to achieve and wanted the prospective envoy to take this up.

Outside these two niggles, there was the usual buoyant assessment of US-India ties, with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry reiterating the broad Washington consensus that ''America is an interested stakeholder in India's increasing ascent to greater economic and greater global power and participation.'' Powell, a veteran foreign service nominee who Kerry described as ''one of our best'' agreed, describing India as ''leading security partner of the US in the 21st century.''

Describing India as a ''net security provider in the Indo-Pacific region,'' Powell, considering a shoo-in for the New Delhi post with confirmation a mere formality, said the ''number and kinds of interactions between our two countries at all levels is staggering in its breadth and depth.''

dont ask for the link...its from TOIlet
 
.
if true than good.
we have the independent policy unlike your puppets. we will respect your decision of dealing with us though.
 
.
UN did not sanction Iran.... Why should we mess with a local neighbor to win American Nuclear trade? We have other more reliable partners like Russia and France. It is a loss for US if they stall nuclear trade.

India should find a way out of this issue without hurting both US and Iranian sentiments!
 
.
@American Senators

go with your frustration elsewhere. India is too big for u.Don't tell us what to do.
 
.
lets see how long we can hold our breadth....US has already started twisting our arms by cutting the company's credits performing outsourcing to India.:bad:
 
.
lets see how long we can hold our breadth....US has already started twisting our arms by cutting the company's credits performing outsourcing to India.:bad:

It is a catch 22 situation... Companies need to outsource to increase the profits and come out of possible recession. They can decrease the unemployment rate... But US companies have to bear the burden and there are more chances it will slip into another recession... I hope US don't want it to happen!
 
.
It is a catch 22 situation... Companies need to outsource to increase the profits and come out of possible recession. They can decrease the unemployment rate... But US companies have to bear the burden and there are more chances it will slip into another recession... I hope US don't want it to happen!
agreed....but as u hav seen outsourcing trend is started to change, to bump us they'll simply outsource the services to countries like Philippines.
 
. .
This is good news for India. It shows that our policy is independent. India doesn't need nuclear trade with US, we are getting the reactors from Russia and France, and uranium from Kazakhstan, Niger, Namibia and other countries. Moreover Iran's oil and gas is of more importance to India than any US sponsored sanctions. US would continue to apply pressure, but hope the Indian Government doesn't fall prey to the US tactics.
 
.
agreed....but as u hav seen outsourcing trend is started to change, to bump us they'll simply outsource the services to countries like Philippines.

Agreed but still Philippines CANNOT replace India anytime soon.... And also US needs India for much more bigger reason called CHINA!

---------- Post added at 03:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:41 PM ----------

US says: You are either with us or against us.There is no 'neutral' word in US foreign policy's dictionary.

Same holds good from our point of view... You should be with India, Not with Pakistan! Our foreign policy is independent!

---------- Post added at 03:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:43 PM ----------

This is good news for India. It shows that our policy is independent. India doesn't need nuclear trade with US, we are getting the reactors from Russia and France, and uranium from Kazakhstan, Niger, Namibia and other countries. Moreover Iran's oil and gas is of more importance to India than any US sponsored sanctions. US would continue to apply pressure, but hope the Indian Government doesn't fall prey to the US tactics.

You do not know the basics... India became powerful because of software... and 60-70% of clients are US based!
 
.
This is good news for India. It shows that our policy is independent. India doesn't need nuclear trade with US, we are getting the reactors from Russia and France, and uranium from Kazakhstan, Niger, Namibia and other countries. Moreover Iran's oil and gas is of more importance to India than any US sponsored sanctions. US would continue to apply pressure, but hope the Indian Government doesn't fall prey to the US tactics.

JAI HO ..."SCO" ki. INDIA,PAKISTAN,CHINA & RUSSIA are facing extinctional THREAT from US,WEST & ISREALI CONTROLLED BANKERS.
 
. . .
Same holds good from our point of view... You should be with India, Not with Pakistan! Our foreign policy is independent!
Being with India has nothing against being with Pakistan.You two have problems and it's better for both sides to solve it by any means.It doesn't mean Iran shouldn't have relations with Pakistan or India
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom