TNT
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Messages
- 7,555
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
What you have stated is very close to my position. Perhaps, I have done a poor job of communicating. I guess my question is what does it mean to have a state religion in your mind?
The hudud crime of theft is referred to in Quran verse 5:38:
Would you support this law? There would be no one left in Pakistan with two hands.
Would you agree there are better ways in the modern world to address petty theft by an impoverished, first-time, juvenile offender than the prescription above?
Let's say this is the best law --- do you trust for a moment for Pakistani judiciary, law-enforcement to be fair and equitable in dispensing impartial evidence-based justice?
Very nice answer that I understood. Thanks. I was referring to the other gentleman saying every singly worldly problem is solved in the holy quran itself. This may be correct but it would still be subject to human interpretation.
The punishment is proscribed in Quran but as u said, in a pathetic and corrupt judicial system of Pakistan, that would be mostly misused. In Islam, an Islamic state can change punishments. There are recommendations in Quran and they are the upper boundaries. For example, according to my limited knowledge, u cannot give death punishment for theft but u can give a lighter punishment than cutting off hand. One example is that of Islamic way of divorce. You have to give divorce in 3 different sitting, so as to eliminate emotional decision. But then in times of Umar RA, cases of 3 talaqs in one sitting became common and most would later regret it and change their decision. This led the khalifa to change the law so whoever gave 3 talaqs in one sitting,the talaq would be considered official and with no option of reverting and changing decision plus 10 lashes. It was a punishment for not following the proper way of talaq in Islam. It shows that laws and punishments can be amended based on the era and its need, as long as it does not collide with the basics. Not cutting off hand as a punishment for theft does not collide with the basics of Islam. There is ijma is Islam, there is alot of freedom given in Islam. The problem is we let mullah interpret it for us and every mullah have made his groups and followers. Can u believe that mullahs will actually tell u not to study Quran urself because u might not understand it and go astray so u have to learn it from him and believe how he explains it. While its written in Quran very clearly that its sent in simple and easy language so that u can understand it easily. So should we believe what mullah says or the what the Quran say?