What's new

Second Hindu temple gets vandalized in Washington state

MY DEAR FELLOW INDIANS PREPARE YOUR BRAHMOS THIS IS AN ACT OF WAR :guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::guns::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
. . .
Buster; its got nothing to do with LITERACY, but its got everything to do with ATTITUDE. :)
Most American can read and write, but that is where it all ends. Their "World-View" does not extend much beyond their block or at best.... their county boundaries.
I've had folks there confronting me as an Arab..... :lol: and not all of them were Texan red-necks!

So you're saying that if 5 white guys walked down the street in any part of India, every Indian would know their nationality? And no foreigner has ever been attacked anywhere in India? If this true, hats off to you. You truly are the superior nation.
 
.
Obama needs first educate Americans what is Hinduism and how it is different from Islam.Most of the cases of attack are misidentify because of lack of education.
So its less bad if it happens to Muslims ?
 
.
I have a simple solution to this problem actually. Stop interacting with Indians without exception. Problem solved. :)

So I ask you why you do that and you give an answer on what to do when they do that instead? Let me guess, you didn't read the post either :lol:
 
.
Suppose we have a problem with Denmark. Those are white people right?

There are 100s of white people roaming around the streets of India as tourists. You wont find us taking them by collars and lynching them because we have a problem with some Danish people.

Even if some foreigners are attacked in India, its not because of their nationality but because thugs want to loot their expensive cameras, watches etc.

So you're saying that if 5 white guys walked down the street in any part of India, every Indian would know their nationality? And no foreigner has ever been attacked anywhere in India? If this true, hats off to you. You truly are the superior nation.
 
. .
So what you're saying is that you're ok with attacks on Muslims but have a problem when your temple gets some graffiti on it?

Precisely. America is not tolerant when we tolerate Muslims more than Hindus. He suggest that we should do otherwise.
 
.
Precisely. America is not tolerant when we tolerate Muslims more than Hindus. He suggest that we should do otherwise.

If something happens in India, how the F*** and what the F*** Americans have to tolerate? BS
 
Last edited:
. .
If something happens in India, how the F*** and what the F*** Americans have to tolerate? BS

It's your business. It's Obamas perogative on his view of religious tolerance in India. You can stuff your ears and ignore him. But it's within his right to discuss the obvious religious intolerance in India.

If you don't like America so much, you can always ask your gov not to buy US engines for your LCA. Let's see how far your tentrum will take you.
 
.
It's your business. It's Obamas perogative on his view of religious tolerance in India. You can stuff your ears and ignore him. But it's within his right to discuss the obvious religious intolerance in India.

If you don't like America so much, you can always ask your gov not to buy US engines for your LCA. Let's see how far your tentrum will take you.

Other religions are also tolerating British and spanish immigrants who came 200 years back. LOL Are you one of them? Go back!

And I have right under Liberty and freedom of speech to speak about British and Spanish immigrants in USA, Tolerated by others.
 
.
Suppose we have a problem with Denmark. Those are white people right?

There are 100s of white people roaming around the streets of India as tourists. You wont find us taking them by collars and lynching them because we have a problem with some Danish people.

Even if some foreigners are attacked in India, its not because of their nationality but because thugs want to loot their expensive cameras, watches etc.

Ok, let's recap. The argument being made by an Indian is that Indians (not SOME Indians, mind you) would be able to tell the difference between Germans and Brits and they wouldn't attack a German for something a Brit did. It is not being argued that an Indian would never attack anyone. My stance, obviously, is that an Indian cannot tell the difference between a German and Brit and the only deciding factor is whether he intends to beat up the next white guy he sees or not. So unless you're saying that the reason those 100s of white people roaming around the streets don't get beat up is because Indians can tell that they are not Danish just by looking at them, you're arguing the wrong point.
 
Last edited:
.
Ok, let's recap. The argument being made by an Indian is that Indians (not SOME Indians, mind you) would be able to tell the difference between Germans and Brits and they wouldn't attack a German for something a Brit did. It is not being argued that an Indian would never attack anyone. My stance, obviously, is that an Indian cannot tell the difference between a German and Brit and the only deciding factor is whether he intends to beat up the next white guy he see or not. So unless you're saying that the reason those 100s of white people roaming around the streets don't get beat up is because Indians can tell that they are not Danish just by looking at them, you're arguing the wrong point.

It is the christians attacking Hindus , not some white or black, brit or danish. So it's easy to differentiate.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom