Ethiopian Dude
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 0
i cant post images for some reason
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
scythians were nomadic savages who practised canabalism according to many greek sources....the bible groups them under extreem barbarians. They are the ancestors of the english scottish, irish,german and dutch race.they use to live in central asia before they migrated to europe when the roman empire was in decline.These people were known as sakas in india they use to plunder the northern part of india in ancient times they were also slaves of the indians for many centuries when the indian empire dominated central asia under the kushans......thats one of the main reasons western europeans and particularly the british always insult indians in the media and movies covertly......... they know the real history of their origins..........europeans are desendents of indian albinos...... they are scared to death of the world finding out their real origin and why they became white(albino).
Again you are confusing them with Vikings, Celts and others. Scythians were NOT Samartians
You mean Sarmatians or Samaritians?
New Recruit
Again you are confusing them with Vikings, Celts and others. Scythians were NOT Vikings, Illyrians, Tocharians, Samartians, Persians, Anglo-Saxons, Slavs etc. Europeans are not descended from "indian albinos" where do you read such nonsense? Most modern Europeans are from Germanic, Slavic, Baltic, Illyrian, Anatolian and Celtic tribes.
I think you are complaining about the terminology. i agree terminology is not always appropriate. Like the term "Indo-European" for the prehistoric people who liked in Eurasia. I personally think "Indo-European" languages should have been called Eurasian languages, after all their origin point is in Eurasia. Just like I think Urdu should have been called a Vedic language instead of Indo-Aryan since Urdu and it's sister language descend from Vedic Sanskrit.
But problem is it's in mainstream use so we have to go by them unless in the future these misleading terms can be changed.
hi guys, I have a question, why do indian Gujjars, Rajputs and even Jats to an extent look different from the pakistani ones? It seems Indians ones are clearly much more mixed with local Indian blood. For example I knew several Gujjar families from northern Punjab in Pakistan and many of them resembled Pashtuns and even Kalash, like they had very fair skin and also had colored hair brownish/reddish, but when I met an Indian Gujjar from Indian state of Gujarat in India, he was almost as Dark as a Tamil person. My question is, are these people even considered one group of people? just because they are Gujjars, Jats, Rajputs, are they even same people now?
New Recruit
Indo-European origins of Scythians can only be partially True
One also forget that first inhabitants of Eurasian Steppes are Cimmerians. Who were Cimmerians?
Their Iranian origins is documented, acknowledged by most experts and proved by the still Iranian origins by their only real descendants, the Ossetians.
They were Indo-European too, and probably had a Iranian elite. Iranians ruled the whole steppe once.
Cimmerians - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indo-European origins of Scythians can only be partially True. If someone decides Scythians are Iranians, then Circassians, Chechens, Magyars, Slavs become non-indigenous to Eurasian steppes.
One also forget that first inhabitants of Eurasian Steppes are Cimmerians. Who were Cimmerians?
Ethnic classification of pre-Jesus era nations are almost impossible because of poor documentation.
Scythians were not Iranian, but Iranic. Iranians simply refers to people from the modern country Iran. Iranic refers to peoples of a common source and their language family. The proto-Iranic people did not live in Iran but somewhere in central Asia. And also a lot of people from Iran (Iranians) are not Iranic. Like Kyrgyz people are not Turkish but Turkic. Same way Scythians were not Iranian but Iranic.
dude modern europeans are not indigenious to europe.......... their original homeland is in central asia. they invaded europe the first were the latins and the dorians who invaded southern europe... scythians were the last to leave their central asian homeland and move in to europe. Europeans are desended form indian albinos... i figured this out after seeing an albino indian dude who i mistook for a northern european...this is the hidden history which europeans will never admit. i tried posting pictures but i couldnt for some reason... i'll try again.