Audio
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages
- 5,411
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does not matter if the relationship is going well or not the fact remains is they are classed as a major non-Nato ally unlike India.
I dont think you will be hearing much more of that, or if you will, it will be lip service.
SCO is the way to go to stabilize this region. SCO should take over from USA/NATO in Afghanistan. But Russia and China should take their hands off from Syria, they are no longer welcome there.
They can trade their concerns.
China back Russia in Syria, that's in line with this SCO party.
Well if India does not join we can all gang up and dismember India and truly make our neighbourhood peaceful lol
In a fantasy plan that he presented to the central government in June 1971, he stated in an immatured manner in his own words that "I would capture Agartala and a big chunk of Assam, and develop multiple thrusts into Indian Bengal. We would cripple the economy of Calcutta by blowing up bridges and sinking boats and ships in Hooghly River and create panic amongst the civilians. One air raid on Calcutta would set a sea of humanity in motion to get out of Calcutta
That is the fate of American proxies
Yes, but SCO's southward reach goes up to borders of Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Syria is not in that region. SCO should have no business meddling in Syria which is outside this region. SCO's business should be to stabilize Afghanistan instead and take it over from USA/NATO. Just my personal opinion.
The fact that you mention we can all is the clear first sign of massive inferiority