HariPrasad
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Source?
I read somewhere that its not wise to use reactor of submarines in aircraft carriers.
I say capability.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source?
I read somewhere that its not wise to use reactor of submarines in aircraft carriers.
Not more than 160 mw......Are they in class of 300 to 400 mw
Are they in class of 300 to 400 mw
Source?
.....5 years ..and by then there would be enough 'foreign' hands to condemn it...“We hope to start the construction work in another five years, after obtaining the requisite permissions.
2035 damn its so far. World will have flying carriers by then.
As per the source given by this proud Indian we are also devloping a 150 mw nuclear reactor for our SSN's.Now this is some serious shit,if it is true.......@jarves :
7) Financial sanction has just been accorded for BARC & NPCIL to co-develop an indigenous 900mW PWR by upscaling the 83mW LWR that was developed for the S-2/Arihant, S-3 & S-4 SSBNs.
8) Financial sanction has been just accorded for BARC to develop a 190mW LWR by upscaling the 83mW LWR. This 190mW LWR will also be offered for installation on the projected IAC-2, & on the S-5, S-6 & S-7 SSBNs.
TRISHUL: Sensor Fitments Of IAC-1/INS Vikrant & INS Vikramaditya Explained
As per the source given by this proud Indian we are also devloping a 150 mw nuclear reactor for our SSN's.Now this is some serious shit,if it is true.......
And 190mw for IAC2??
What about 150mw nucclear reactors for our SSN,do you think it is true??Yep , 190MW reactor for IAC2 if navy wants them nuclear powered and also for next gen SSBNs from S5 onwards .
What about 150mw nucclear reactors for our SSN,do you think it is true??