What's new

Scientists announce possibility of particle smaller than Higgs Boson

Skull and Bones

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Messages
18,601
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
United States
LONDON: Until 2012, nobody was certain it existed till the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) announced they had found the God Particle.

Scientists now say that it is more likely than ever now that there must be particles smaller than Higgs particle

"Nobody has seen them yet; particles that are smaller than the Higgs particle. However theories predict their existence, and now the most important of these theories have been critically tested," they said.

The result: The existence of the yet unseen particles is now more likely than ever".

The Higgs Boson is central part of the Standard Model of particle physics that describes how the world is constructed.

According to the Standard Model, everything, from flowers and people to stars and planets, consists of just a few building blocks: matter particles. These particles are governed by forces mediated by force particles that make sure everything works as it should.

The entire Standard Model also rests on the existence of a special kind of particle: the Higgs particle. This particle originates from an invisible field that fills up all space. Even when the universe seems empty this field is there. Without it, we would not exist, because it is from contact with the field that particles acquire mass.

On 4 July 2012, at the CERN laboratory for particle physics, the theory was confirmed by the discovery of a Higgs particle.

CERN's particle collider, LHC (Large Hadron Collider), is probably the largest and the most complex machine ever constructed by humans.

Last year, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced that the 2013 Nobel Prize for Physics to Peter Higgs after whom the particle is named.

But in a new twist, Thomas Ryttov, particle physicist and associate professor at the Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics Phenomenology refers to the theories, that over the last five years have been put forward for the existence of particles in the universe that are smaller than the Higgs particle.

Having given these theories a critical review, he finds no new signs of weakness in them:

"There seems to be no new or unseen weaknesses. My review just leaves them just stronger," he says.

Over the past 5-8 years, a handful of theories have drawn particular interest from particle physicists. They all predict that there must be one or more types of particles that are even smaller than the Higgs particle. So far it has however not been possible to prove their existence.

"Here we are interested in the pursuit of such as yet unknown particles. We know that there must be a force that binds them together so that they together can create something bigger than themselves, something composite; a Higgs particle. It must happen similarly to quarks binding together to form protons and neutrons. If we can understand this force, we can explain and predict new physical phenomena like new particles," explains Ryttov.

This force is called the strong force, he says. It cannot be compared to gravity, which also has the ability to keep two objects close together. The effect of gravity depends on the fact that the two objects are not too far from each other, and the closer they are to each other the stronger the force of gravity will be. The strong force has the opposite effect: It is weak when two particles are close to each other, but strong - extremely strong - if you try to pull them apart.

Thomas Ryttov and his colleagues believe that the so-called techni-quarks can be the yet unseen particles, smaller than the Higgs particle. If techni-quarks exist they will form a natural exention of the Standard Model which includes three generations of quarks and leptons. These particles together with the fundamental forces form the basis of the observed matter in the universe.

Scientists announce possibility of particle smaller than Higgs Boson - The Times of India
 
.
Lets see what happens next. We are going both ways i.e after the biggest(Big Bang & Multiverse) and the smallest ones.!!
 
.
Lets see what happens next. We are going both ways i.e after the biggest(Big Bang & Multiverse) and the smallest ones.!!

Huge investment on infrastructure is required to detect smaller subatomic particles. Fermi lab in US was supposed to be what CERN is now. But US government shut down the project after repeated failed experiments.

For example of Gravitons, if we be able to make a sensor with 100% efficiency, and place it in orbit of any star, it has a probability of detecting one Graviton particle every decade.
 
.
Huge investment on infrastructure is required to detect smaller subatomic particles. Fermi lab in US was supposed to be what CERN is now. But US government shut down the project after repeated failed experiments.

For example of Gravitons, if we be able to make a sensor with 100% efficiency, and place it in orbit of any star, it has a probability of detecting one Graviton particle every decade.

I had to first read what is Graviton is. Then I found out this "For example, a detector with the mass of Jupiter and 100% efficiency, placed in close orbit around a neutron star, would only be expected to observe one graviton every 10 years, even under the most favorable conditions"....WOW
 
. . .
Not sure, maybe forces exerted by particles on each other, and changes it's state? o_O
I think, the force itself is regarded as made up of elementary particles(hypothetical) called force-particles......like a 'graviton'--"a hypothetical quantum of gravitational energy, regarded as a particle"......some say, 'gravitons' are tiny 'black-holes'......
 
.
I think, the force itself is regarded as made up of elementary particles(hypothetical) called force-particles......like a 'graviton'--"a hypothetical quantum of gravitational energy, regarded as a particle"......some say, 'gravitons' are tiny 'black-holes'......

Force is interaction of one matter to another matter or energy, i don't think it can be divided into subatomic particles.
 
.
Force is interaction of one matter to another matter or energy, i don't think it can be divided into subatomic particles.
....but how that interaction happens, what causes it.......how do you define energy....
 
. . .
So, energy=stream of quantum particles and energies interact with each other due to force..acc. to you?

No, quantum particles exert force on the matter and particles it interacts with.

The relativistic momentum exerted by the particles can be given by,

E^2=P^2 * C^2 + M^2 * C^4

P being the momentum.
 
.
No, quantum particles exert force on the matter and particles it interacts with.

The relativistic momentum exerted by the particles can be given by,

E^2=P^2 * C^2 + M^2 * C^4

P being the momentum.

I'm weak in Maths....LOL....
Anyway, you say that, quantum particles exert force on matter it interacts with....and you also said that energy is nothing but a stream of quantum particles.....so, acc. to you, force is nothing but energy....BUT, you said that force cannot be divided into subatomic/quantum particles......contradictory....
 
.
.
I'm weak in Maths....LOL....
Anyway, you say that, quantum particles exert force on matter it interacts with....and you also said that energy is nothing but a stream of quantum particles.....so, acc. to you, force is nothing but energy....BUT, you said that force cannot be divided into subatomic/quantum particles......contradictory....

Nope, maybe i failed to understand you in a better way. According to quantum theory, energy can be quantized into a particle form, with near zero mass. But the effect of the particle on other particle cannot be quantized.

Think about it in this way, consider two balls made up of many smaller balls. When the balls hit each other, the balls can be subdivided, but the forces acts on each other cannot be subdivided into fundamental particles. You can calculate the force acting on the individual constituent balls.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom