Savarkar offered Chandra Shekhar Azad money to stop fighting British

[noksss]

There is a spike in articles about Veer Savarkar lately looks like there is something good about him which the commies want to hide ? I read this about him sometime before not sure how true it is


Those who were considered to be dangerous by British Govt were sent to Cellular Jail. Nehru & Gandhi lived their life in comfort.

It's easy to meet a bullet and lie in peace for once and for all, takes courage and the guts of iron to willingly stand tortures day in and day out for years and years and years.
Veer Savarkar was jailed & tortured in Andaman's Cellular Jail for more than 10 years. W...as meted out a treatment so inhuman that a lesser mortal would break down within a week and commit suicide or prefer being given a swift death. But not Veer Saavarkar.
He wrote his book on Freedom struggle on the walls of jail. He realized that he can inspire people to fight for freedom only by getting out of Cellular Jail & be in mainland since wars are won by soldiers who are alive, not by ones who are dead.

When Savarkar was in Cellular Jail, the freedom struggle slowed down. For the sake of motherland & freedom struggle, he did something for which he knew he would be ostracised for, be called a 'coward mercy seeker' for the rest of eternity. And yet he adopted a strategy of tacticall retreat where he gave an impression of a weak, broken down 'reformed' convict in the eyes of British, and then asked for mercy plea.

After many peitions, the British govt finally released him but they were so scared of him that they kept him in House arrest in his home in Maharashtra's Ratnagiri for rest of his life.
However, being in the mainland, which was his strategy, he met and inspired millions of freedom fighters. Just his presence was enough to give confidence to freedom fighters. It gave a boost to the freedom struggle.

His book 'The Indian War of Independence' about the Indian rebellion of 1857 was banned even before its publication. When Savarkar was in Ratnagiri, Bhagat Singh met him. Bhagat Singh was very much inspired by Savarkar's thoughts and his book that he published the book in Gurumukhi language and distributed among people.

The soldiers fight with full force till the commander is standing with them. The moment the commander is dead, the soldiers run away. Veer Savarkar played the role of commander.

Sacrifice is all glorious and noble but wars are won by soldiers who stand their ground and fight even in face of defeats and humiliation.
Today we remember the greatest freedom fighter and nationalist idealogue of modern india, on his Jayanti.

@Roybot @ranjeet @Rain Man

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Savarkar offered Chandra Shekhar Azad money to stop fighting British

Today, 23 July, is the 111th birth anniversary of Chandra Shekhar Azad, one of the greatest leaders of the Indian freedom movement.

Azad led the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA), India’s premier revolutionary, anti-Imperialist organisation. Earlier, when the organisation was called HRA, Ram Prasad Bismil was the chief.

Azad took over the leadership after Ram Prasad Bismil, Ashfaque Ullah, Roshan Singh, and Rajendra Lahiri, the leading lights of the HRA, were arrested. All four were hanged at different places. HRA’s spine was broken.


Yet, along with Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru, Azad rebuilt the party as a socialist organisation committed to the overthrow of the British regime.

Despite being a leftist, Azad never gave up wearing the sacred religious thread (Janeu). Though born in Madhya Pradesh, Azad was a Kanyakubja Brahmin from Badarka, Unnao in Uttar Pradesh. He came from Awadh that produced Binda Tiwari, Mangal Pandey and several other freedom fighters.

The Awadhian Brahmin ethos carried both idol worshippers and iconoclasts, staunch defenders of the status quo and eloquent rebels. For Azad and many leftists from Awadh who came after him, there was no contradiction between feeling proud as a Sanatani Brahmin and following an ideology that believed in egalitarianism.

Also Read: NU row: Delhi court to pronounce order on Umar, Anirban's bail plea today
In fact, these figures interpreted the Brahmin ethic as one which believed in the primacy of merit over caste or religion based nepotism, fight for justice a divine duty, social responsibility as an intrinsic value, and tolerance/integration with other creeds a moral duty.

It is important to recall these attributes today, as forces belonging to a particular ideology are creating fake images of Chandra Shekhar Azad with Hindutva type ’tilak’ on his forehead.

Azad was a wrestler who exercised regularly while wearing his sacred thread (Janeu). But there is no picture of him with a ’tilak’ on his forehead. There is of course no issue in leftists sporting ’tilaks’ as its just that certain practices should not be imposed on historical figures.

Subscribe to Janta Ka Reporter @ 299₹

Earlier, in the 1980s, Khalistanis tried appropriating Bhagat Singh as a mere Sikh hero. This, after Bhagat Singh openly announced his atheism in an article written before he became a martyr of India’s freedom struggle.

Also Read: Indian cosmetics haven't taken back seat: Make-up expert Bambboat
Attempts to appropriate Azad by Hindutva will also fail. More so because of Azad’s well documented revulsion towards RSS and Hindu Mahasabha.

Azad knew that Hedgewar, the RSS founder, an ex-HRA member, was a British informer. Bhagat Singh and Azad suspected Hedgewar to have informed on Ram Prasad Bismil and other HRA comrades.

HSRA leaders used to call RSS members ‘toady bachchas‘ or British hirelings.

To avenge the death of Lala Lajpat Rai, Azad and Bhagat planned and executed the political assassination of Lahore British officer Saunders together.

After Bhagat Singh’s arrest, Azad was raising money for his comrade’s defence. Author and litterateur Yashpal, who was part of the HSRA then, was sent by Azad to Veer Savarkar of the Hindu Mahasabha.

Yashpal writes in his autobiography ‘Singhavalokan’ that Savarkar agreed to give Rs. 50,000 but on the condition that Azad and HSRA fighters stop fighting the British and assassinate Jinnah and other Muslims!

Also Read: Fearing poll code violation, now BJP minister says Modi did not conduct road show on Saturday
In his another book ‘Fighter for Freedom Writer for Justice,’ Yashpal wrote on page number 72, “He (Savarkar) did not refuse my request, but expressing his own viewpoint and purpose, he said, ‘Our aim is to free the country from servitude to foreigners. Progress towards our nationhood is the purpose of freeing the country– that must be assured……If you take the responsibility of finishing him (Jinnah) off then the greatest obstacle on the path of freedom will be removed. And, for that I can arrange for a payment of Rs 50,000.'”

On being told of Savarkar’s proposal, Azad cursed Savarkar and said: “This man does not consider us as freedom fighters but supari killers. He’s colluding with the Vritish. Our fight is against the Britishers. Why would we kill Muslims? Tell him we don’t want his money.”


http://www.jantakareporter.com/india/savarkar-chandra-shekhar-azad/138294/

Yeh Jhant ka Reporter is a Fake front of JNU chap gang...

 

[noksss]

Yeh Jhant ka Reporter is a Fake front of JNU chap gang...

Don't crash land his happy flight dude

 

[salimpheku]

as bad as the British were Germans & Japanese were even worse

How?
How was USA dropping nuclear bomb on Japan any worse than what Hitler did to Jews?

Do you know the number of people that were killed during Bengal Famine or during various stages of independence struggle?

My simple question is not about which country was better.

My only question is the logic behind Gandhi not wanting Indians to use arms to fight British but the same person asking Indians to pick up arms and fight for British. Under which perverted logic this person be defined as a freedom fighter?

 

[The_Showstopper]

Yeh Jhant ka Reporter is a Fake front of JNU chap gang...

Prove that it is fake... All the while I've seen the Sanghi leaders and their propaganda front spreading fake news.

We already know that Savarkar begged British to pardon and mercy, so there is every possibility that he must have cut a deal with them.

There is a spike in articles about Veer Savarkar lately looks like there is something good about him which the commies want to hide ? I read this about him sometime before not sure how true it is


Those who were considered to be dangerous by British Govt were sent to Cellular Jail. Nehru & Gandhi lived their life in comfort.

It's easy to meet a bullet and lie in peace for once and for all, takes courage and the guts of iron to willingly stand tortures day in and day out for years and years and years.
Veer Savarkar was jailed & tortured in Andaman's Cellular Jail for more than 10 years. W...as meted out a treatment so inhuman that a lesser mortal would break down within a week and commit suicide or prefer being given a swift death. But not Veer Saavarkar.
He wrote his book on Freedom struggle on the walls of jail. He realized that he can inspire people to fight for freedom only by getting out of Cellular Jail & be in mainland since wars are won by soldiers who are alive, not by ones who are dead.

When Savarkar was in Cellular Jail, the freedom struggle slowed down. For the sake of motherland & freedom struggle, he did something for which he knew he would be ostracised for, be called a 'coward mercy seeker' for the rest of eternity. And yet he adopted a strategy of tacticall retreat where he gave an impression of a weak, broken down 'reformed' convict in the eyes of British, and then asked for mercy plea.

After many peitions, the British govt finally released him but they were so scared of him that they kept him in House arrest in his home in Maharashtra's Ratnagiri for rest of his life.
However, being in the mainland, which was his strategy, he met and inspired millions of freedom fighters. Just his presence was enough to give confidence to freedom fighters. It gave a boost to the freedom struggle.

His book 'The Indian War of Independence' about the Indian rebellion of 1857 was banned even before its publication. When Savarkar was in Ratnagiri, Bhagat Singh met him. Bhagat Singh was very much inspired by Savarkar's thoughts and his book that he published the book in Gurumukhi language and distributed among people.

The soldiers fight with full force till the commander is standing with them. The moment the commander is dead, the soldiers run away. Veer Savarkar played the role of commander.

Sacrifice is all glorious and noble but wars are won by soldiers who stand their ground and fight even in face of defeats and humiliation.
Today we remember the greatest freedom fighter and nationalist idealogue of modern india, on his Jayanti.

@Roybot @ranjeet @Rain Man

Veer Savarkar played the role of commander?

Savarkar had begged the British for mercy - Times of India

 

[noksss]

Prove that it is fake... All the while I've seen the Sanghi leaders and their propaganda front spreading fake news.

We already know that Savarkar begged British to pardon and mercy, so there is every possibility that he must have cut a deal with them.


Veer Savarkar played the role of commander?

Savarkar had begged the British for mercy - Times of India

How about reading it one more time slowly

he did something for which he knew he would be ostracised for, be called a 'coward mercy seeker' for the rest of eternity. And yet he adopted a strategy of tacticall retreat where he gave an impression of a weak, broken down 'reformed' convict in the eyes of British, and then asked for mercy plea.

 

[The_Showstopper]

How about reading it one more time slowly

he did something for which he knew he would be ostracised for, be called a 'coward mercy seeker' for the rest of eternity. And yet he adopted a strategy of tacticall retreat where he gave an impression of a weak, broken down 'reformed' convict in the eyes of British, and then asked for mercy plea.

Aaww the tacticall retreat