What's new

Saudi-UAE axis has destabilising plans beyond Persian Gulf

Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
863
Reaction score
-1
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
"Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are putting their bets on Trump's re-election to realise their vision for regional hegemony.

As the situation in the Middle East continues to escalate, with Iran and the US-Saudi axis trading accusations over sabotaged vessels in the Gulf, Qataris quietly marked two years of living under siege.

Riyadh and Abu Dhabi continue lobbying against Doha on international platforms and are showing no sign of easing their economic siege. This became apparent once again at the three summits the Saudi king hosted in Mecca last month, to which Qatar was invited.

During the proceedings, Saudi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Assaf said a solution to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) crisis would only be possible if Doha goes back to the "right path" - that is, if it heeds to the Saudi and Emirati regional agenda.

Despite having failed to subdue their neighbour thus far, both Abdu Dhabi and Riyadh seemingly believe that hostile measures can still yield the desired outcome. Their persistence with the blockade is part of their larger plan to establish regional hegemony in the long term. The success of their plan, however, is very much wedded to US President Donald Trump securing a second term.

Internal friction
Since June 2017, there have been several attempts to resolve the GCC crisis, with Kuwaiti Emir Sheikh Sabah Al Ahmad Al Sabah leading regional efforts, but no progress has been made to date.

Meanwhile, it is becoming increasingly clear that various power centres within the blockading quartet are growing disaffected with the current situation.

Up until now, Dubai - not Doha - has been the biggest loser in the crisis. Many international firms which were managing their Qatar businesses from regional offices in Dubai had to relocate to Doha due to the blockade restrictions. The emirate's logistics and trade sectors also took a hit, as Qatari companies which used to import goods through the Jebel Ali port had to reroute the supply roots through the Port of Salalah in Oman.

Last year, Dubai’s stock exchange saw its worst collapse since the 2008 financial crisis and this year it may not fare any better, especially as renewed US sanctions on Iran have caused it lose billions of dollars.

In Saudi Arabia, there has been growing concern over the leverage Abu Dhabi and its de facto ruler Mohamed bin Zayed (MBZ) have over the kingdom's decision-making. His influence over Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) has worried some quarters and so has the aggressive behaviour of the young heir to the throne. In the aftermath of Jamal Khashoggi's gruesome murder and the series of public reports linking the crime to the crown prince, Riyadh was forced to "clip his wings" and have King Salman take back a number of key portfolios.

The Saudi-Emirati endgame
Despite the growing friction within the quartet, MBZ and MBS have managed to keep it united enough to continue pressuring Qatar. The blockade on their fellow GCC-member is a key part of their plan for regional hegemony.

So far it hasn't been just Doha's resilience that has thwarted their efforts to bring the GCC under their full control. It has also been the refusal of both Kuwait and Oman to join the blockade. Kuwait's Sheikh Al Sabah and Oman's Sultan Qaboos have stood their ground and refused to cave in to pressure. As a result, there are increasing signs that Abu Dhabi and Riyadh are seeking to influence the succession processes in both Gulf countries and ensure that the successors of the two ageing monarchs are more willing to join their alliance and follow their cue on GCC and regional politics.

At the same time, with the help of the Trump administration, MBZ and MBS are hoping to weaken the two other contenders for regional influence: Iran and Turkey. Both played an important role during the initial stages of the blockade on Qatar, with Ankara sending troops to help boost the security of the small Gulf country.

Iran is now the target of a relentless diplomatic onslaught by the Saudi-Emirati alliance, backed and encouraged by the US. The reimposition of the US sanctions has pushed the Iranian economy to the brink.

Meanwhile, Turkey is also experiencing growing political and economic difficulties. The Trump administration has recently escalated its pressure on Ankara over its purchase of the Russian S-400 missile system and threatened sanctions which have affected negatively the already faltering Turkish economy.

All these efforts are aimed at removing all obstacles to Saudi-Emirati regional hegemony and securing the following outcomes: Kuwait and Oman abandoning neutrality in the GCC crisis and falling in line with the axis; Turkey and Iran being contained and weakened; Sudan, Libya and Algeria seeing the consolidation of military regimes loyal to Riyadh and Abu Dhabi; and Qatar caving in to pressure and submitting to Saudi and Emirati domination, after being isolated and abandoned by allies.

The success of this plan largely depends on Trump being re-elected in 2020 and continuing the anti-Iran campaign, the pressure on Turkey and the support for Saudi and Emirati interests in the crises in North Africa. MBZ and MBS hope that another four years of Trump in the White House would give them enough time to reshape the regional geopolitical landscape in their own favour.

MBZ and MBS may appear to be on the offensive, but in reality, they are on the defensive. Their plan perfectly illustrates the many insecurities the two regimes harbour and their desperate attempt to preserve them. Change in the Middle East, however, is inevitable."

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/o...destabilising-plans-gulf-190620174959333.html
 
.
Don't agree with the conclusions of this. Trump rejected a number of opportunities to militarily attack Iran. He also allowed Turkey, Russia and Iran a free hit in Syria by withdrawing US troops. Trump is not on the same page as the Saudis and UAE. Trump genuinely wants out of this middle east quagmire.

Hillary would've been far far better for KSA and UAE. She would gladly sacrifice US lives without hesitation to further realise the Zbigniew Brzezinski-type projects of the previous millennium.
 
.
Don't agree with the conclusions of this. Trump rejected a number of opportunities to militarily attack Iran. He also allowed Turkey, Russia and Iran a free hit in Syria by withdrawing US troops. Trump is not on the same page as the Saudis and UAE. Trump genuinely wants out of this middle east quagmire.

Hillary would've been far far better for KSA and UAE. She would gladly sacrifice US lives without hesitation to further realise the Zbigniew Brzezinski-type projects of the previous millennium.
Saudis and UAE hated Obama because he refused to take the pro-Saudi line on all issues and dared to have relations with Iran.

Trump is fully pro-Saudi because all he cares about is milking them dry (as he constantly boasts about how he managed to milk even more money from the Saudis and how without the US, Saudi's regime would collapse within a week!).

US continues to arm and support Saudi's war against Yemen despite its elected chamber of government voting to end US military and diplomatic support for Saudi's war in Yemen (Trump vetoed the resolutions).

US took no action against KSA murdering a US resident journalist, despite huge pressure and criticism against Trump.

Huge US sanctions against Iran keep Iran weak and isolated, allowing KSA/UAE to dominate the region.

Simple and clear logic and arguments in this article.
 
.
The success of this plan largely depends on Trump being re-elected in 2020 and continuing the anti-Iran campaign, the pressure on Turkey and the support for Saudi and Emirati interests in the crises in North Africa.
So is there anyone in their right mind who will reverse the annulment of the nuclear deal with Iran, or "unrecognise" Jerusalem as Israel's capital? I get your points about Trump being good for KSA and Obama being bad for KSA...But Hillary would've been awesome and anyone who comes in now won't be any worse for KSA than Trump is in my opinion. Nobody's going to dial back the support for ksa and some may do better than Trump. I don't think it really matters who comes in next in Washington. What matters most is how Iran, Turkey and Russia react on the ground...or indeed whether they are kept busy arguing with each other in Syria to even notice what the Gulf states are up to.
 
.
So is there anyone in their right mind who will reverse the annulment of the nuclear deal with Iran, or "unrecognise" Jerusalem as Israel's capital? I get your points about Trump being good for KSA and Obama being bad for KSA...But Hillary would've been awesome and anyone who comes in now won't be any worse for KSA than Trump is in my opinion. Nobody's going to dial back the support for ksa and some may do better than Trump.
Respectfully, this is entirely incorrect.

The DNC officially passed a resolution supporting re-entering the JCPOA and all 3 of the main Democratic candidates (Biden, Bernie and Warren) are STRONGLY in favour of the JCPOA.

All 3 are very critical of Trump's ties with KSA; specifically, the non-response to Saudi's murder of Khashoggi and vetoing US House of Reps bills attempting to ban US arms deals with KSA and end US military support for Saudi's invasion of Yemen.
 
.
Respectfully, this is entirely incorrect.

The DNC officially passed a resolution supporting re-entering the JCPOA and all 3 of the main Democratic candidates (Biden, Bernie and Warren) are STRONGLY in favour of the JCPOA.

All 3 are very critical of Trump's ties with KSA; specifically, the non-response to Saudi's murder of Khashoggi and vetoing US House of Reps bills attempting to ban US arms deals with KSA and end US military support for Saudi's invasion of Yemen.
Yes there's consistent outcry over Kashoggi but MBS will easily shift the blame onto rogue agents and nothing beyond lip service to a liberal electorate will transpire in the US if dems are in power. On Yemen, Biden himself was VP when Obama initially supported Saudi intervention in Yemen. Sanders is at least consistent but why would Biden be deserving of any trust over his politics towards KSA? I suspect business and geopolitical interests will come first and anyone placing their hopes in the democratic party will be sorely disappointed. They're far more anti-Trump than anti-war. The position on non-interference in Yemen is in stark contrast to Biden and others' comments regarding Syria. Biden would happily endure a destructive war in Syria, despite the humanitarian crisis there being at least as bad as the one in Yemen.
 
.
I don’t think Saudi are as a negative influence as suggested, they just prefer stability & security and one can respect that. The problem is the UAE - it was astounding when they awarded Modi that gold necklace & gave him a state visit 2 weeks after he literally locked up Kashmir.
 
.
I don’t think Saudi are as a negative influence as suggested, they just prefer stability & security and one can respect that. The problem is the UAE - it was astounding when they awarded Modi that gold necklace & gave him a state visit 2 weeks after he literally locked up Kashmir.
Lol The Saudis funded the ypg terrorists which are fighting Turkey
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/saudi-minister-requests-support-for-ypg-pkk-terrorists/1504938

https://thenewturkey.org/to-counter-turkey-saudi-arabia-backs-the-ypg-in-syria
https://www.dailysabah.com/americas...i-government-as-pompeo-lands-in-riyadh-report
They helped overthrew the democratic elected egyptian leader and installed brutal dictator sisi.
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/saudi-arabia-cheers-the-coup-in-egypt/
They are funding, arming and supporting puppet dictator haftar in libya because they dont like Turkey
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...llions-dollars-offensive-190412175708363.html
They sided with Israel and supported the genocidal Southern Cyprus against Turkey
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-against-turkeys-activities-in-mediterranean/

They called for boycott and economic blockade of Turkey
https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/arab-league-condemns-turkeys-syria-incursion-calls-un-action
They launched a blockade of their own arab Neighbour Qatar for not being a Saudi puppet and having Turkish soldiers on its land because The Turkish Soldiers prevented Saudi Arabia from invading Qatar
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...di-demand-to-pull-turkish-troops-out-of-qatar
Saudi Arabia condemn Turkey despite what they did to Yemen

Saudi Arabia is one of the most destabilising forces in the whole region, If you want to know why Saudi Arabia is so against Turkey. It is because the house of Saud is pro Israel

@Attila the Hun @xenon54 @ANMDT @MMM-E @CAN_TR @Aslan1071 @Oublious
 
.
Lol The Saudis funded the ypg terrorists which are fighting Turkey
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/saudi-minister-requests-support-for-ypg-pkk-terrorists/1504938

https://thenewturkey.org/to-counter-turkey-saudi-arabia-backs-the-ypg-in-syria
https://www.dailysabah.com/americas...i-government-as-pompeo-lands-in-riyadh-report
They helped overthrew the democratic elected egyptian leader and installed brutal dictator sisi.
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/saudi-arabia-cheers-the-coup-in-egypt/
They are funding, arming and supporting puppet dictator haftar in libya because they dont like Turkey
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...llions-dollars-offensive-190412175708363.html
They sided with Israel and supported the genocidal Southern Cyprus against Turkey
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-against-turkeys-activities-in-mediterranean/

They called for boycott and economic blockade of Turkey
https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/arab-league-condemns-turkeys-syria-incursion-calls-un-action
They launched a blockade of their own arab Neighbour Qatar for not being a Saudi puppet and having Turkish soldiers on its land because The Turkish Soldiers prevented Saudi Arabia from invading Qatar
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...di-demand-to-pull-turkish-troops-out-of-qatar
Saudi Arabia condemn Turkey despite what they did to Yemen

Saudi Arabia is one of the most destabilising forces in the whole region, If you want to know why Saudi Arabia is so against Turkey. It is because the house of Saud is pro Israel

@Attila the Hun @xenon54 @ANMDT @MMM-E @CAN_TR @Aslan1071 @Oublious
Erdogan our Sultan of the Ottoman Empire should crush Saudis!!
 
.
Lol The Saudis funded the ypg terrorists which are fighting Turkey
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/saudi-minister-requests-support-for-ypg-pkk-terrorists/1504938

https://thenewturkey.org/to-counter-turkey-saudi-arabia-backs-the-ypg-in-syria
https://www.dailysabah.com/americas...i-government-as-pompeo-lands-in-riyadh-report
They helped overthrew the democratic elected egyptian leader and installed brutal dictator sisi.
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/saudi-arabia-cheers-the-coup-in-egypt/
They are funding, arming and supporting puppet dictator haftar in libya because they dont like Turkey
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...llions-dollars-offensive-190412175708363.html
They sided with Israel and supported the genocidal Southern Cyprus against Turkey
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-against-turkeys-activities-in-mediterranean/

They called for boycott and economic blockade of Turkey
https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/arab-league-condemns-turkeys-syria-incursion-calls-un-action
They launched a blockade of their own arab Neighbour Qatar for not being a Saudi puppet and having Turkish soldiers on its land because The Turkish Soldiers prevented Saudi Arabia from invading Qatar
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...di-demand-to-pull-turkish-troops-out-of-qatar
Saudi Arabia condemn Turkey despite what they did to Yemen

Saudi Arabia is one of the most destabilising forces in the whole region, If you want to know why Saudi Arabia is so against Turkey. It is because the house of Saud is pro Israel

@Attila the Hun @xenon54 @ANMDT @MMM-E @CAN_TR @Aslan1071 @Oublious


part of the princess mbs vision 2030....
 
.
Good article but with each passing day its getting difficult to contain iran. Containing Turkey is a far fetched dream and not possible realistically. Turkey has transformed in past decade and have reduced their reliance on west. They are also militarily very strong.
In my opinion the arabs monarchs should get out of the mentality of ethnicity and be open and represent all muslims, something Turkey has successfully done. Arabs cannot take on iran and Turkey together, they should have kept good relations with Turkey. If iran grew closer to Turkey(which it is) that can be a big problem for GCC, as Turkey can provide iran with the advanced weapons n technology it craves.
 
. . .
Turkey is almost getting independent in its defence sector. Its aviation industry is at par with Europe, it manufactures top line hardware. If you are not aware of Turkish defence industry then u shouldn't be here.
only thing turkey is good at it compared to Iran is small arms. and that's because our commanders have the mentality that something that fires bullet is good enough. otherwise we have tons of homegrown firearm designs waiting for production.
but i would love to hear what u have in mind that turkey has and we lack it.
 
.
only thing turkey is good at it compared to Iran is small arms. and that's because our commanders have the mentality that something that fires bullet is good enough. otherwise we have tons of homegrown firearm designs waiting for production.
but i would love to hear what u have in mind that turkey has and we lack it.
He can't answer with specifics because he doesn't know. He doesn't know because there is nothing Turkey currently produces that Iran doesn't or can't.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom