I'm all ears.
By us I meant all people who are raising an eyebrow over your interesting posts.
Again religious values are in no way co-related to social values or cultural ones. If they were, then the concept of Mehram would only have had been coined by the Saudi society.
International pressure? You're extremely hilarious
KSA never gave a rat about the international community. If it were then we wouldn't have invaded Bahrain unilaterally on one hand, or release the prisoners of Al-Qaida on a " humanitarian " ground. The King himself was described by the West as a reformist. But to assume that KSA would consider compromising with outsiders when it comes to its internal affairs is extremely laughable
I never denied such incidents to be begin with. All I'm saying is that these reports were a bit inaccurate compared to what took place.
First of all, it is called Saudi Arabia or KSA. Saudia stands for the Saudi Airlines
And If there were someone making a parody in all of this, then it definitely has got to be you for your religious illiteracy, excessive ignorance, unimaginable bigotry, and above all unthinkable prejudice.
And why can't the Saudi people determine what suits them the best and what not? If you think so that the Saudis are going to make a concession to appease an outsider like yourself or the whole world, then I regret telling you that such thinking will bring a huge disappointment for you
Now coming down to why the Saudi society is acting too reluctantly when it comes to this issue, I would like to reiterate the fallowing:
1) Some people feel uncomfortable on a security, and safety ground.
2) The fanatic factor - note that I never denied the existence of such thing.
3) Many women, themselves, oppose it as such thing never existed in here before.
4) The existence of alternative means is also delaying implementing such decision.
Personally, I don't have any problem with women driving, I did sign the petition myself among half a million of Saudi. Most of my immediate female family members do have driving licenses, but they too are indifferent as long as a replacement exists.
So sorry, but we are on the web, where there is no such thing as an embarrassment
Incarcerated them?
I told you before the concept of Mehram can only be applied when a woman travels from one place to another she doesn't know a thing of
...
What nullifies your claim is the fact that many Saudi women go to work in a mixed-gender places like banks, hospitals, and companies. Unless you still insist on that international pressure theory of yours.
Discussing
about me? What a load of nonsense.
It isn't my problem that you lack the means to find out what it has already been said about this earlier.
My response in a jest of course was to pinpoint that domestic violence is a red line to us. This also include the abuse of females. There is no need to re-invent the wheel of this given the similarities between both cases.
Not true. If there were a restriction on Al-Arabyia in Dubai in the first place, then there is no point for them having their studios in Dubai. They can move elsewhere, maybe to Egypt or Kuwait or Bahrain or even KSA.
I never said that Al-Arabyia is an online news agency either. What I said was that Saudi Gazette happens to be an online news agency based in Riyadh, with no censorship at all in
Saudia.