What's new

Saudi investment in University in Jalalabad : $500 million funds

And the taliban were a better solution? would you like that kind of regime for Pakistan?

much better then indian stooge covering our whole northern borders (with dreams of loy Afghanistan aka greater Afghanistan) while we already face 7 times larger enemy in east..

Why didn't you support Masood if Afgan well being was in your mind ? Because it wasn't,Pakistan wante A'stan reduce to rubble

We supported him even if saying Pakistan gave him political birth is not wrong, but the clown has problem with us bcoz of his racist views, we used to supply more arms to more trustable pashtuns bcoz there was more intense fight in east then it used to be in northern side where Massod and his men were based, for which he turned against Pakistan in early 90's..

How about you GOOGLE it....It's simple and it's out there

how much time it takes to post your reliable source? do you want us to believe tabloids?
 
. . .
Does it deny indian state sponsered terrorism via northern terrorists?

India backed the Northern Alliance after the hijacking of Indian Airlines plane to Kandahar
In any case the entire world minus Pakistan, UAE & KSA recognized the Northern Alliance as true rulers of Afghanistan
 
.
Another section and some more @flamer84 BS.
Show us your proof of "Whole Pakistani Battalions" who fought in Panjsher or shut up.
You made an outlandish and wrong statement, either provide the proof or shut it and jog on.


Ok,if there's no direct evidence of Pakistani troops,there is of Pakistani nationals and we all know that they weren t there by accident.My guess (and many think the same) tht they were actually Pak soldiers

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm#17

weird how Pak citizens made such high amount of tali soldiers

What's the time frame of the Modern Era?

20-21st century
 
.
In any case the entire world minus Pakistan, UAE & KSA recognized the Northern Alliance as true rulers of Afghanistan

and these three countries matter more then whole world, hence Afghan Taliban captured 90% Afghanistan with ease.. while northern scums failed despite having support of "World".. as far as i know US didnt recognize Northern terrorists as legitimate rulers..
 
Last edited:
.
and these three countries matter more then whole world, hence Afghan Taliban captured 90% Afghanistan with ease.. while northern scums failed despite have support of "World".. as long as i know US didnt recognize Northern terrorists as legitimate rulers..

"and these three countries matter more then whole world"

that is your opinion
 
.
Actually it was the other way around.


I think that by the late 80's it was clear that the Pashtunistan ideea had no significant followers in Pakistan so that phobia should have played no part in Pakistani meddling in A'stan.The fact that Pakistan supported the most opressive factions in A'stan stands...first Hekmatyar,than the talibans.
 
.
Ok,if there's no direct evidence of Pakistani troops,there is of Pakistani nationals and we all know that they weren t there by accident.My guess (and many think the same) tht they were actually Pak soldiers

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB227/index.htm#17

weird how Pak citizens made such high amount of tali soldiers



20-21st century

Holding on to straws.
You said whole "Pakistani Battalions" fighting in Panjsher. Either provide proof for that or admit that you made and outlandish and wrong statement without any knowledge.
 
.
Holding on to straws.
You said whole "Pakistani Battalions" fighting in Panjsher. Either provide proof for that or admit that you made and outlandish and wrong statement without any knowledge.


There are whole claims of it but I didn't want to quote wiki or the Norther Alliance so I provided only a link for Pakistani citizens embedded with the taliban...and their numbers are to high to be simple "volunteers"

much better then indian stooge covering our whole northern borders (with dreams of loy Afghanistan aka greater Afghanistan) while we already face 7 times larger enemy in east..

Pashtunistan ideea was dead from the 80's

We supported him even if saying Pakistan gave him political birth is not wrong, but the clown has problem with us bcoz of his racist views, we used to supply more arms to more trustable pashtuns bcoz there was more intense fight in east then it used to be in northern side where Massod and his men were based, for which he turned against Pakistan in early 90's..

You funneled all US aid to the "butcher of Kabul" since the 80's,never did you support Masood.
 
.
There are whole claims of it but I didn't want to quote wiki or the Norther Alliance so I provided only a link for Pakistani citizens embedded with the taliban...and their numbers are to high to be simple "volunteers"
Actually there is none.
The Taliban never conquered the Panjsher valley. So those "Pakistani Battalions" are nothing but a creation of your imagination nothing more.
 
. .
Actually there is none.
The Taliban never conquered the Panjsher valley. So those "Pakistani Battalions" are nothing but a creation of your imagination nothing more.


Did I say they conquered it ? Masood whooped them,just like he did the Soviets.....than your al qaeda buddies assasinated it him.The facts remain,read my link,altough you know I'm right,the world knows it.It's an open truth,Pakistan was full backer of the taliban,crocodile tears don't serve anyone now.If Pakistan has decency it should contribute to the development of A'stan instead of moaning against the refugees it actually owes a great debt,a debt which can never be repaid after they helped destroy their country and kill their families.

Funny how Pakistanis complain of the US but the evil their country did is 10 times worse.....
 
. .
your favorite massoud also did Mass bombardment of Kabul...


Not my favourite,he was a warlord....just that he was better than the rest of the lot,the lesser evil ,if you want.And,under his domain,women were'nt killed for adultery and they could go to school...etc,etc,
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom