What's new

Saudi doublespeak hits India’s core interests

Indo-guy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
Singapore
Saudi doublespeak hits India’s core interests - Indian Punchline


Wow! Shall I credit myself with a touch of prescience? After all, what I wrote about the visit of the Saudi Crown Prince and Defence Minister Salman bin Abdul Aziz’s visit to Pakistan last weekend was spot on. (See my article “Don’t ask what Saudi Arabia can do“).
The AFP just reported quoting Saudi sources that Riyadh is in talks with Islamabad “to provide anti-aircraft and anti-tank rockets to Syrian rebels to try to tip the balance of the war to overthrow [Syrian] President Bashar al-Assad.” (here)
But I won’t be triumphalist here, since this is a dangerous development that affects India’s core interests. Saudi Arabia is dealing a terrible blow to regional security by engaging Pakistan (’subcontracting’ might be the right word) in its jihadi enterprise in Syria.
Indeed, Pakistan is terribly unwise to get involved in the Saudi-Iranian, US-Russian proxy war or to dabble in the business of ‘jihad’ all over again when its own house is on fire.
And the most appalling thing is that the Barack Obama administration without whose concurrence King Abdullah won’t venture into this mad adventure, is being plainly diabolical.
WaPo’s David Ignatius disclosed two days ago that the CIA and the Saudi intelligence put their heads together recently in Washington to rev up the ‘jihad’ in Syria by supplying more sophisticated weapons to the rebels.
Of course, Delhi needs to be extremely watchful. Its naivete is incredible in underestimating the robustness of the Saudi-Pakistani fraternal ties. What an irony that Defence Minister A. K. Antony was persuaded to visit Riyadh to encourage the Saudis to invest in co-production in the Indian defence industry and to boost and give verve to ml-to-mil ties — and, lo and behold, within two years Riyadh prefers to strengthen Pakistan’s defence industry.
Why such willing suspension of disbelief on our part when it comes to Saudi Arabia? Unfortunately, the heart of the matter is that our domestic politics has crept into this template of our Gulf policy.
The plain truth is that the petrodollar oligarchies are exercising a larger-than-life influence on our corrupt political class. Partly at least, this accounts for the calibrated policy to gradually atrophy India’s relations with Shi’ite Iran in the recent years.
Hopefully, some balance will be restored under a BJP government.
In immediate terms, Salman is due to arrive in Delhi on a three-day visit on Wednesday. We should ascertain the details regarding his move to draw on Pakistani expertise in ‘jihad’ (a number of Pakistani ‘jihadis are are already fighting in Syria and Pakistan is also reportedly training the ‘jihadis’ recruited from other countries by Saudi intelligence for the war in Syria.)
The point is, Saudi Arabia has a gory record of being responsible for the induction of the forefathers of the al-Qaeda in this region during the 1980s. When the war in Syria gets over, will Saudi Arabia rehabilitate these battle-hardened Pakistani jihadis in Riyadh or Jeddah? This is a serious question.
For far too long, India has looked away from the harsh reality that Saudi Arabia is a state sponsoring terrorism, which uses ‘jihad’ as an instrument of policy to perpetrate terrorist acts in foreign countries. Delhi should speak up — unless it has lost its spine and Muslim politics in India trumps national security interests.
Make no mistake that Pakistan is immensely experienced in demanding and extracting its pound of flesh for such highly professional services rendered in the ‘jihad’ in Syria.
In the prevailing regional milieu, when the US and Saudi dependence deepens in the highly strategic enterprise to overthrow the Assad regime, they lose the moral and political standing to stop the Pakistani project to return the Taliban to power in Kabul. They will only see it as a small price to pay.
 
India knows that SA is a rabid regime, it does the dirty business of the US.
 
Nobody is crying,just stating the truth.

'Just yesterday some of the Indian members were rejoicing about major shift in Geo-political arena. And we both said that it's too early to say so .
that's why I posted this article with other side of viewpoint ....
 
LOL, We should keep away from this holy god forsaken mess that is bound to end up with someone holding the bastard child in the end, and we clearly know who that chump is gonna be.

Saudis have also demanded 12000 Pakistani soldiers, inadvertantly to be infiltrated into Syria to counter the Iranian guards fighting on behalf of Assads forces.
 
Indians always cry when Muslims get together and and if Assad is topple and some sort of religious guys come in government they can put Israel security which is a great friend of India at risk
 
Indians always cry when Muslims get together and and if Assad is topple and some sort of religious guys come in government they can put Israel security which is a great friend of India at risk


LLOL@ cry, humne agar kuch karne ka dil bana liya toh kaafi ulat palat kar denge - we intend to drive some logic into affairs.

Muslims getting together against whom....u r right - Muslims. Have you heard of Israel's samson option? 400 nukes can do a lot of damage.
 
why is this indian loser crying again? :lol:
Why is **** paedo-rist laughing ? :)

Indians always cry when Muslims get together and and if Assad is topple and some sort of religious guys come in government they can put Israel security which is a great friend of India at risk
Pakistani mullahs always cry when terrorists get killed. He he he
 
LOL, We should keep away from this holy god forsaken mess that is bound to end up with someone holding the bastard child in the end, and we clearly know who that chump is gonna be.

Saudis have also demanded 12000 Pakistani soldiers, inadvertantly to be infiltrated into Syria to counter the Iranian guards fighting on behalf of Assads forces.

Pakistani soldiers to fight in Syria? Are you making this up? Where's your source?
 
Back
Top Bottom