Did I say RSAF should "replace" F-15 . If so , can you point it out where I said that.
That is what you were implying in your previous posts genius, here i'll point that out for you since you are too blind to see it for yourself, its a pity that you don't even know what you yourself have stated.
Only a genius like you would make stuff up like that. I can see you are not a Pakistani cause you argue like Indians. First fabricate what was not said and then answer the fabricated question. So you are not only a genius but also an Imposter.
and now you resort to calling me a "imposter" and an indian, and am i supposed to get offended from being called a "Genius"?........... sigh, people can go to any limits these days
Again, you are stating that was never said. What I said was to diversify risk by adding these two types IN ADDITION TO THEIR PRESENT INVENTORY.
First of all, you make no sense whatsoever since your just contradicting yourself, you stated in your post
#177 that in case of an embargo the RSAF's F-15's will be "15 ton of mettalic junk".
Exact Quote from your post:
The point my myopic friend is F-15 is a superior strike a/c but in case of parts embargo it is a 15 ton of mettalic junk. Having aircrafts from non western sources mitigates some of that danger, Genius.
Capisch ?
And here in your post
#174 your suggesting that RSAF should induct JF-17's and J-10s for strike capability, but how does it make sense for the RSAF to induct single engine aircraft for strike role when in their doctrine/strategy they use twin engine strike aircraft like the F-15's and Tornado's who are far superior in performance then the JF-17 and J-10?
Exact Quote from your post:
Saudi RSAF should seriously consider both JF-17 and J-10B as part of its strike capability. There are two powerful arguments for this strategy:
1. It is a good idea not to put all your eggs in the same basket ( i.e. Western aircrafts ) because of the danger of Embargo from the West in case of hostilities with ISRAEL. Always a good idea to diversify your risk.
2. If RSAF have a few squadrons of JF-17 and J-10B and if ever they have a need, PAF pilots could assist in matter of few hours.
Cheers
Going by your logic in case of a Arms Embargo by USA and other Western Sources the Saudi F-15's will become "15 ton of mettalic junk" so therefore the Saudis should induct single engine JF-17's (which are no where close to the capabilities of F-15 and Tornados) and J-10's, but my point is how does it make sense to induct single engine platforms for the same strike role as F-15 (as you were implying in your post
#177 and post
#174) when you might as well induct another twin engine strike aircraft like SU-30 from Russia?
No "CAPISCH" because you don't even know what your talking about.
call me whatever you like, i know who i am, and your only exposing your ignorance and immature behavior by resorting to personal attacks.
The guy has been around for a while now....not to mention, he's a senior member with several anti-indian posts under his belt. You guys really ought to stop calling everyone who disagrees with you "indian".
