What's new

Saudi Arabia, Qatar backing terrorists: Syria

you are big lier the americans didn't attack iraq from saudi arabia > they attack iraq through iran and form Afghanistan >

read this > Riyadh refused to let American planes take off on ground-attack strikes from its airfields during the Iraq war, because it would look as if Saudi Arabia was backing an attack on fellow Muslims - a restriction that irritated US military commanders.

Non-strike missions - for refuelling, reconnaissance and other purposes - were permitted.

read this and if you want more sources google will guide you
click here

second watch this video will tell who is the snack

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
What Saudi need to do is mask All the Muslim Forces to come together and finish of ASSAD and his army so Syrians can be liberated and the massacre by Assad and his force can be stopped

I am particularly not interested in this Thread But why should RSA reunite and lead others against Syria why not liberate a 42+ Year occupied Palestine. Why would RSA and friends chest thump and babble over Syria where were United Gulf Nations when each and everytime israel striked-Strikes Palestine and Lebanon.

As for assad he is one sick man who completed his life term rule it is time he steps down like a man gracefully and let democratically elected party(s) come forward and solve problems Syria is facing both from Terrorism and western-Israeli blocked economically.

It is on record Internationally people with-in Regimes of RSA-Qatar-U.A.E-Iran-Lebanon-Syria are supporting funding Terrorism in Gulf and S.Asia..Anyone denying to accept is living in fools paradise.
 
.
:woot: :lol: :rofl:
Like a Boss we create our own anthems for other countries.

Anyway your calling these peaceful demonstrators ?





and much more on this channel

SyriaTruthNetworkEN's Channel - YouTube
Who the hell said its peaceful anymore?
Those are FSA who are defending their people after 10 month of peaceful demonstrations. They couldn't stay peaceful while watching their women and children raped and tortured to death. They absolutely have the right to defend themselves and kill Bashar bastards everywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Syrian lion the saudi women have the ambition to be far beyond your limited thinking while your goal is playing soccer.

take a look and play soccer ma man its better for you :lol:

saudi women work as a pilot

1331766090551.jpg


First Muslim-Arab woman to become NASA researcher

1331766090132.jpg


saudi woman work as engineer for the saudi air force

1331766090523.jpg


:wave::wave::wave:

Raise your hand if you know who back stabbed the Ottomans for British.
Raise your hand if u know who made the deal with the Americans for oil in exchange for protection.
Raise your hands if u know which Western military has bases in Saudi Arabia.

I can go on if you like but i think this should keep you busy for some time Ariel.

saudi arabia has no american bases you need to renew your info
 
.
Syrian lion the saudi women have the ambition to be far beyond your limited thinking while your goal is playing soccer.

take a look and play soccer ma man its better for you :lol:

saudi women work as a pilot

1331766090551.jpg


First Muslim-Arab woman to become NASA researcher

1331766090132.jpg


saudi woman work as engineer for the saudi air force

1331766090523.jpg


:wave::wave::wave:



saudi arabia has no american bases you need to renew your info
They cant even drive a car?? what are you talking about?
Lol ok check this out
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . .
Down your head if you lie too much! no one would ever spare one second with you... plz keep posting...

Mr. Daniels's projections place the cost of an Iraq war in line with that of the 1991 Persian Gulf war, which cost more than $60 billion, or about $80 billion in current dollars. But the United States paid for only a small part of that conflict, with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Japan bearing the brunt of the costs.

Mr. Daniels declined to explain how budget officials had reached the $50 billion to $60 billion range for war costs, or why it was less in current dollars than the 43-day gulf war in 1991. He also declined to specify how much had been budgeted for munitions and troops.

''All of these are major costs,'' he said.

The driving expense for the military in any war would be the size of the American force and the length of the conflict. In the 1991 war, 550,000 American troops were based in Saudi Arabia, which picked up the cost of virtually all housing, fuel and food.

If you like i have more about this as its not exactly a hidden secret House of Saud will Try for people to forget there role in Iraq war.
 
.
Mr. Daniels's projections place the cost of an Iraq war in line with that of the 1991 Persian Gulf war, which cost more than $60 billion, or about $80 billion in current dollars. But the United States paid for only a small part of that conflict, with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Japan bearing the brunt of the costs.

Mr. Daniels declined to explain how budget officials had reached the $50 billion to $60 billion range for war costs, or why it was less in current dollars than the 43-day gulf war in 1991. He also declined to specify how much had been budgeted for munitions and troops.

''All of these are major costs,'' he said.

The driving expense for the military in any war would be the size of the American force and the length of the conflict. In the 1991 war, 550,000 American troops were based in Saudi Arabia, which picked up the cost of virtually all housing, fuel and food.

If you like i have more about this as its not exactly a hidden secret House of Saud will Try for people to forget there role in Iraq war.

its 2012. As I mentioned before, you need to renew your info. the american troops packed up and left the country in 2003
:wave:
 
.
http://im13.gulfup.com/2012-03-15/1331766090551.jpg[/IMG]

First Muslim-Arab woman to become NASA researcher<-----------------NASA Isnt part of Saudi Arabian Government or even in Saudi Arabia


Saudi Arabia has no American bases you need to renew your info

Beginning during Operation Desert Shield in August 1990, while preparing for the Gulf War, the United States sent a troop contingent to Saudi Arabia. After the war, the troops remained, under Operation Southern Watch.

Operation Southern Watch enforced the no-fly zones over southern Iraq set up after 1991, and the country's oil exports through the shipping lanes of the Persian Gulf were protected by the US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain.

In 2003, the United States withdrew most troops from Saudi Arabia.

Since Saudi Arabia houses the holiest sites in Islam (Mecca and Medina) — many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of US troops after the Gulf War in Saudi Arabia was one of the stated motivations behind the September 11th terrorist attacks[1] and the Khobar Towers bombing. The date of the 1998 United States embassy bombings was eight years to the day (August 7) that American troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.[2] Bin Laden interpreted the Prophet Muhammad as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".[3]

Opinion polls conducted by Gallup from 2006–2008, find that many in Muslim majority countries strongly object to U.S. military bases in Saudi Arabia. 52% of Saudis agreed that removing military bases from Saudi Arabia would very significantly improve their opinion of United States. Also 60% of Egyptians, 39% of Jordanians, 40% of Syrians and Palestinians, 55% of Tunisians, 13% of Iranians, 29% of Turks, 40% of Lebanese, 30% of Algerians gave that opinion too.[4]

The U.S. has rejected the characterization of its presence as an "occupation", noting that the government of Saudi Arabia consented to the presence of troops. Many in the U.S., the Arab world and elsewhere saw the presence of U.S. troops as supporting the House of Saud, the rule of which is controversial.
[edit] Withdrawal

On April 29, 2003, Donald Rumsfeld announced that he would be withdrawing US troops from the country stating that the Iraq War no longer required the support. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had earlier said that the continuing US presence in the kingdom was putting American lives in danger. The announcement came one day after the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) was shifted from Prince Sultan Air Base to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

The move was controversial, as some said that it was a needless contingent that only enraged Muslim populations, while others said that the United States were caving to the demands of Osama bin Laden.

U.S. officials transferred control of portions(portions mean some parts not all that means they are still there) of Prince Sultan Air Base to Saudi officials at a ceremony on August 26, 2003. The base had been home to about 60,000 US personnel over time.
 
.
Down your head if you lie too much! no one would ever spare one second with you... plz keep posting...

I asked a question to raise your hands if u no the answers to all these question obviously you don't that don't mean you start shouting and start calling names you are ignorant and slow that's not my fault.

Jordanian in denial silly Jordanian Don't you no DE_Nile is a river in Egypt not Jordan,just because you are shouting doesn't mean what i said isn't backed by 60 billion dollars pay out to Americans by House of Saud does it now.
 
.
http://im13.gulfup.com/2012-03-15/1331766090551.jpg[/IMG]

First Muslim-Arab woman to become NASA researcher<-----------------NASA Isnt part of Saudi Arabian Government or even in Saudi Arabia




Beginning during Operation Desert Shield in August 1990, while preparing for the Gulf War, the United States sent a troop contingent to Saudi Arabia. After the war, the troops remained, under Operation Southern Watch.

Operation Southern Watch enforced the no-fly zones over southern Iraq set up after 1991, and the country's oil exports through the shipping lanes of the Persian Gulf were protected by the US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain.

In 2003, the United States withdrew most troops from Saudi Arabia.

Since Saudi Arabia houses the holiest sites in Islam (Mecca and Medina) &#8212; many Muslims were upset at the permanent military presence. The continued presence of US troops after the Gulf War in Saudi Arabia was one of the stated motivations behind the September 11th terrorist attacks[1] and the Khobar Towers bombing. The date of the 1998 United States embassy bombings was eight years to the day (August 7) that American troops were sent to Saudi Arabia.[2] Bin Laden interpreted the Prophet Muhammad as banning the "permanent presence of infidels in Arabia".[3]

Opinion polls conducted by Gallup from 2006&#8211;2008, find that many in Muslim majority countries strongly object to U.S. military bases in Saudi Arabia. 52% of Saudis agreed that removing military bases from Saudi Arabia would very significantly improve their opinion of United States. Also 60% of Egyptians, 39% of Jordanians, 40% of Syrians and Palestinians, 55% of Tunisians, 13% of Iranians, 29% of Turks, 40% of Lebanese, 30% of Algerians gave that opinion too.[4]

The U.S. has rejected the characterization of its presence as an "occupation", noting that the government of Saudi Arabia consented to the presence of troops. Many in the U.S., the Arab world and elsewhere saw the presence of U.S. troops as supporting the House of Saud, the rule of which is controversial.
[edit] Withdrawal

On April 29, 2003, Donald Rumsfeld announced that he would be withdrawing US troops from the country stating that the Iraq War no longer required the support. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had earlier said that the continuing US presence in the kingdom was putting American lives in danger. The announcement came one day after the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) was shifted from Prince Sultan Air Base to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

The move was controversial, as some said that it was a needless contingent that only enraged Muslim populations, while others said that the United States were caving to the demands of Osama bin Laden.

U.S. officials transferred control of portions(portions mean some parts not all that means they are still there) of Prince Sultan Air Base to Saudi officials at a ceremony on August 26, 2003. The base had been home to about 60,000 US personnel over time.

the time Why the U.S. Is Pulling Out of Saudi Arabia - TIME

its my country i know more than you do
 
.
the time Why the U.S. Is Pulling Out of Saudi Arabia - TIME

its my country i know more than you do

Now keep in mind you posted this link and i didn't.

TIME.com: The U.S. has announced it will pull most (u no what most means it means not all)of its troops out of Saudi Arabia, and has already begun redeploying. Have the Saudis asked for the troop withdrawal, or does it reflect a downgrading of Saudi Arabia's significance as a U.S. ally in the region?

Scott MacLeod: My sources are telling me that the decision was reached by mutual consent, and on a friendly basis &#8212; Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's meetings in Saudi Arabia over the past couple of days have been cordial and friendly, with good vibes reported on both sides. The reason for the withdrawal, my sources are saying, is that there had been a desire for a long time to make the U.S. military presence in Saudi "over the horizon" rather than immediately visible. It'll be there if the Saudis need it, but it won't be there permanently. The end of Saddam Hussein's regime has allowed both sides to scale back their security relationship to where it had been in 1990, before the first Gulf War. Back then, the U.S. had maintained a close military relationship, in terms of training, arms supply and so on, that stretched back decades without causing the sort of domestic political problems that have accompanied the stationing of U.S. troops inside the kingdom since Operation Desert Shield. Now they can revert to that relationship, because the demise of Saddam means the official reason for the U.S. troop presence no longer exists.

Operation Iraqi Freedom had brought an additional 20-25,000 U.S. troops into Saudi over the past few months, and those are obviously no longer needed. Also, the changed landscape of the region means that a facility of the scale of Prince Sultan airbase, from which it was possible to direct thousands of simultaneous air operations, is no longer required.

Read more: Why the U.S. Is Pulling Out of Saudi Arabia - TIME
 
.
Now keep in mind you posted this link and i didn't.

TIME.com: The U.S. has announced it will pull most (u no what most means it means not all)of its troops out of Saudi Arabia, and has already begun redeploying. Have the Saudis asked for the troop withdrawal, or does it reflect a downgrading of Saudi Arabia's significance as a U.S. ally in the region?

Scott MacLeod: My sources are telling me that the decision was reached by mutual consent, and on a friendly basis &#8212; Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's meetings in Saudi Arabia over the past couple of days have been cordial and friendly, with good vibes reported on both sides. The reason for the withdrawal, my sources are saying, is that there had been a desire for a long time to make the U.S. military presence in Saudi "over the horizon" rather than immediately visible. It'll be there if the Saudis need it, but it won't be there permanently. The end of Saddam Hussein's regime has allowed both sides to scale back their security relationship to where it had been in 1990, before the first Gulf War. Back then, the U.S. had maintained a close military relationship, in terms of training, arms supply and so on, that stretched back decades without causing the sort of domestic political problems that have accompanied the stationing of U.S. troops inside the kingdom since Operation Desert Shield. Now they can revert to that relationship, because the demise of Saddam means the official reason for the U.S. troop presence no longer exists.

Operation Iraqi Freedom had brought an additional 20-25,000 U.S. troops into Saudi over the past few months, and those are obviously no longer needed. Also, the changed landscape of the region means that a facility of the scale of Prince Sultan airbase, from which it was possible to direct thousands of simultaneous air operations, is no longer required.

Read more: Why the U.S. Is Pulling Out of Saudi Arabia - TIME

all of them have moved to Qatar al udeid base except 253 americans remained there for training purposes > i won't lie to you as you did before
 
.
all of them have moved to Qatar al udeid base except 253 americans remained there for training purposes > i won't lie to you as you did before

here is the statement

Some 400 to 500 troops will remain in Saudi Arabia as part of the longstanding U.S. training mission with the Saudi Arabia National Guard. The air operations center will move to the $1 billion Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which was built in 1996 at Qatar's expense. The tiny nation, population 750,000, reportedly views the United States as its primary protector in the region. With the threat of Iraq gone, Washington is repositioning other forces in the region as well. Aircraft patrolling the northern no-fly zone from Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, for example, have already been recalled to their home bases.

and the number was decreased to 253
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom