Saudi Arabia Is Planning Record Crude Oil Production in July

[07_SeppDietrich]

3rd Iran should leave the UN to avoid US sanctions even though you won't be received UN aid

 

[Arminkh]

3rd Iran should leave the UN to avoid US sanctions even though you won't be received UN aid

The way it is going I think US will leave UN first

 

[Hack-Hook]

Saudi oil is Arabian light. irani oil is sour and heavy, it’s an obvious choice who we’ll choose.

It's obvious if your refinery designed for iran oil . you'll need to use an oil with the exact same specific.
If its designed for light oil you need to use an oil with the exact same specific or you are courting problem .


And for the record we have both light and heavy oil.

 

[OldTwilight]

They can , they do ....

This is not Ahmadinejad era @raptor22, if they try to replace us, IRGC will cripple their oil production.
An old persian saying

دیگی که واسه ما نمی‌جوشه، سر سگ توش بجوشه

Persian gulf 2ill be their grave

you are naive child ...

 

[Hack-Hook]

Well I doubt we do any thing to them .
KSA agreed to produce 2 million additional barrel of oil on daily bases .
And guess what we did . gave 3900 toman Dollar to pilgrims who went to KSA while industry get 4200 toman Dollar and funny part is the first condition of haj is being financially able.

They can , they do ....


you are naive child ...

 

[TheMightyBender]

1. Develop nukes and start a non nuclear war against saudi and UAE, while threatening anyone interfering with nukes. And threatening US with nukes if they dont remove sanctions.

That is the dictionary definition of bullying. "either restart trade with us or we'll nuke you till oblivion". Thank god Iran is nowhere near being able to bully anyone including the tiny uae.

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Well I doubt we do any thing to them .
KSA agreed to produce 2 million additional barrel of oil on daily bases .
And guess what we did . gave 3900 toman Dollar to pilgrims who went to KSA while industry get 4200 toman Dollar and funny part is the first condition of haj is being financially able.

haha well said. Long live islam and ummah.

 

[Sineva]

That is the dictionary definition of bullying. "either restart trade with us or we'll nuke you till oblivion". Thank god Iran is nowhere near being able to bully anyone including the tiny uae.

And what exactly would you call threatening to sanction anyone who dares to trade with iran then,as chump has done?.Actually its not bullying its blackmail,and nuclear blackmail has the potential to be very,very effective,well it certainly appears to have worked rather well for the dprk so far,altho some of that you could no doubt chalk up to chumps monstrous vanity and ego and the no doubt rightly justified fears of the rok that they might wind up as the dead meat[barbecued?] in a dprk/us nuke sandwich.Ultimately the europeans would have to decide whos interests they were now going to put first,theirs or us+israel.Its one thing to cut ones throat economically for usrael but would you be prepared to risk seeing western europe laid waste for the third time in a century or even just the threat of a return to MAD as it was during the dark days of the early 80s cold war?,I suspect many europeans would not,however when one has lived as a vassal state for decades it is not such an easy task to suddenly start to act and think as an independent state and to put ones own interests first.
Personally I would refer to this strategy as Plata O Plutonio,which means silver or plutonium,its a play on the phrase plata o plomo,which is used by killers working for the mexican drug cartels who make this "generous" offer to potential victims,it means silver or lead,as in chose one ie take the silver[bribe] or take the lead[bullets],from what I`ve heard most take the bribe.
Unfortunately for iran rouhani&co have just had to relearn an old,old lesson of history,and that is that APPEASEMENT DOESNT WORK!!!,just ask neville chamberlain.

 

[TheMightyBender]

And what exactly would you call threatening to sanction anyone who trades with iran then,as chump has done?.Actually its not bullying its blackmail,and nuclear blackmail has the potential to be very,very effective,well it certainly appears to have worked rather well for the dprk so far,altho some of that you could no doubt chalk up to chumps monstrous vanity and ego and the no doubt rightly justified fears of the rok that they might wind up as the dead meat[barbecued?] in a dprk/us nuke sandwich.Ultimately the europeans would have to decidewhos interests they were going to put first,theirs or us+israel.Its one thing to cut ones throat economically for usrael but would you be prepared to risk seeing western europe laid wasted for the third time in a century or even just the threat of a return to MAD as it was during the dark days of the early 80s cold war?,I suspect many europeans would not,however when one has lived as a vassal state for decades it is not such an easy task to suddenly start to act and think as an independent state and put ones own interests first.
Personally I would refer to this strategy as Plata O Plutonio,which means silver or plutonium,its a play on the expression plata o plomo,which is used by killers working for the mexican drug cartels who make this offer to potential victims,it means silver or lead,as in choose one ie take the money[bribe] or take the lead[bullets],from what I`ve heard most take the money.
Unfortunately for iran rouhani&co have just had to relearn an old,old lesson of history,and that is:APPEASEMENT DOESNT WORK,just ask neville chamberlain he`ll tell you that.

Okay you write way too long something that could be summed up in a couple of sentences but I will respond to a couple of points I picked up in your speech:

1- threatening to sanction does not make the US a bully. They are simply saying "if you wanna do business with them, we won't do business with you". It is actually one of the most civil ways of dealing with a country you dont like. It is completely opposite of threatening to nuke them.

2- you think it has worked for dprk? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ever has worked for dprk. They are fucking starving.

3- everything in this forum is a testameny to why Iran will never be allowed to have a nuke. Because as you said irans first objective after getting the nukes will be to threaten everyone they disagree with, with nuking them.

 

[Sineva]

Okay you write way too long something that could be summed up in a couple of sentences but I will respond to a couple of points I picked up in your speech:

1- threatening to sanction does not make the US a bully. They are simply saying "if you wanna do business with them, we won't do business with you". It is actually one of the most civil ways of dealing with a country you dont like. It is completely opposite of threatening to nuke them.

2- you think it has worked for dprk? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ever has worked for dprk. They are fucking starving.

3- everything in this forum is a testameny to why Iran will never be allowed to have a nuke. Because as you said irans first objective after getting the nukes will be to threaten everyone they disagree with, with nuking them.

1-When you`re threatening other countries over their choice of trading partner then that is bullying pure and simple.Its quite alright for the us to say to iran we arent going to trade with you,however its not alright for the us to then threaten anyone else who trades with iran with sanctions,indeed some would probably consider that to be economic warfare.
I`m not threatening to nuke them I`m threatening them with the possibility of a cold war mad type relationship and all the risks that go along with it,I think you`ll find if you think about it that there is a subtle difference between the two.
2-And yet kim for little more than the scrapping of a now redundant nuclear test site got an international summit in singapore with trump while rouhani had his deal torn up and is desperately hoping that the europeans will save his bacon,funny that eh?,I d have to say all in all thats not to shabby for a "fu#king starving" country,albeit one with thermonuclear armed road mobile icbms[LOL!!]
3-Oh...you mean just like the same way they didnt let iran have the fuel cycle or thousands of centrifuges?,or an industrial scale nuclear program,or...oh wait a minute!?.[LOL!] .I just love hearing that same utterly ignorant sh!t from people like you:"Oooh no!,we wont let iran have things like that oh no,no,no,no!",my usual response to that sort of crap is:"Hey Braniac!,it isnt up to the west or indeed anyone else to decide for iran what irans interests are,because iran as a sovereign state,not a us vassal like some I could name[Gobble!,Gobble!] gets the right to decide that for itself,and if one of those interests is to go nuclear,then that decision is solely up to the iranian government and no one else." Now was that simple enough for you or did I use too many words again?,I could try and "dumb it down" for you if you`d like......how about this:Irans choice only.No one elses.There!,2 sentences,6 words total,talk about economy of words in action,wow!
The unfortunate thing is that facists like the chumps and boltons of this world only respect one thing power