What's new

Saudi Arabia in Top 40 R&D spenders, Records Biggest Rise in Spending

Mosamania

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2011
Messages
10,171
Reaction score
5
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
Note: While this is a more general Article I just wanted to highlight KSA's rise in R&D spending which was observed by R&D magazine. This article also gives a very excellent info on Global R&D spending in general. What I mean by Thread title is growth in percentage per GDP.
[/U][/B]
2012 Global R&D Funding Forecast: R&D Spending Growth Continues While Globalization Accelerates

Global R&D spending will increase in 2012 with continued strong growth in emerging economies and stable growth in established economies.

Global R&D spending is expected to grow by about 5.2% to more than $1.4 trillion in 2012, according to an analysis performed by Battelle and R&D Magazine. This advance is slightly less than the 6.5% growth seen in 2011 following the end of the global recession and accompanying R&D stimulus incentives. Most of the global funding growth is being driven by Asian economies, which are expected to increase nearly 9% in 2012, while European R&D will grow by about 3.5% and North American R&D by 2.8%. U.S. R&D is forecast to grow 2.1% in 2012 to $436 billion.

The U.S., European Union (EU), and Asia continue to be the strongest regions for R&D, with a combined total of nearly 92% of all global spending. R&D growth in emerging economies has lowered the U.S. share of global funding to about 31%, although the U.S. remains dominant in absolute terms, and annual increases in U.S. R&D still exceed the total budgets of most countries.

U.S. Economic Concerns
Federal government spending on R&D in 2012 is forecast to decline by about 1.6% to $125.7 billion, while U.S. industrial spending is forecast to increase by 3.8% to $279.7 billion, and academic spending is projected to increase 2.85% to $12.3 billion. Significant government budget reductions are responsible for the drop in federal R&D spending, although R&D is likely to decline proportionally less than the overall federal budget. R&D sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) will see one of the biggest declines (down $2.5 billion to $75 billion forecast for 2012) for the third consecutive year.

The weak U.S. government R&D spending outlook will be partially offset by one of the strongest increases in industrial R&D spending over the past 10 years. This continues a trend of complementary shifts that has helped sustain growth in total U.S. R&D spending. For example, in 2003 and 2004, flat industrial R&D investment was offset by record federal R&D spending, while in 2005 and 2006 industry spending increased and federal government spending decreased.

Part of the 2012 industrial R&D investment can also be attributed to steadily increasing investments by U.S. companies in their offshore research facilities. The overall percentage of such R&D investments is still reasonably small, but many companies are leveraging the economic and collaborative benefits of globalization.

As evidence of the value of scientific discovery as a platform for innovation, the U.S. is targeting about 18% of all R&D at basic research programs, performed mainly in academic and industrial research laboratories. Sponsorship comes mostly from the public sector, with objectives for national scientific leadership and economic competitiveness. Efforts to double the budgets for the National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) still have supporters in Congress despite efforts to reduce overall government spending.

Commercial outcomes are equally important, and U.S. industries have increased expectations for return on their R&D investment. Though only 10% of the companies surveyed several years ago calculated ROI on their R&D, more than 40% do it now, with most using improvements in product quality, competitiveness, and new product sales as key indicators.

Except for Greece, all countries in the Battelle/R&D Magazine's list of Top 40 global R&D spenders are expected to increase their R&D budgets in 2012. Even economically distressed Italy, Ireland, and Portugal will see significant increases in their R&D investments. The EU continues its strong investments in R&D at the individual country level as well as through the European Commission's (EC's) Framework Programme (FP). The EC is planning to increase its eighth version (FP8) in 2014 by nearly 50% to $15 billion per year in basic R&D programs.

China, which became the world's second largest R&D investor in 2011, remains noteworthy as well. Driven by GDP growth, its rate of spending will remain strong in 2012.

Three new emerging economies joined this Forecast in 2012: Malaysia, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. Starting from relatively small commitments (R&D expenditures at less than 1.0% of gross domestic product), each intends to increase its funding over the next several years to reflect the R&D ratios of more innovation-oriented economies.

This report reflects the global researcher viewpoint of R&D. The multinational respondents to our survey confirm trends reported elsewhere, including expectations of future funding constraints across all R&D sectors—government, industry, and academia—as the most critical concern for researchers. It also reveals that the U.S. continues to be the recognized leader in a broad range of technologies such as aerospace, agriculture, military, materials, and life science.

rdpercountry.png


2012 Global R&D Funding Forecast: R&D Spending Growth Continues While Globalization Accelerates | R&D Mag
 
.
0,1 percent of GDP spent on R&D. Do you call that an achievement?
 
.
0,1 percent of GDP spent on R&D. Do you call that an achievement?

No I call spending 0.6 Billion on R&D to 1.8 in a matter of two years is. A 150% rise and growing. And from 0.1% to 0.25% and growing in a span of two years is extremely high relatively speaking.

And from your comment I am guessing you couldn't read the whole article or even read the table right I am guessing.
 
.
Israel 4,3 percent
South Korea 3,4
Japan 3,5
Turkey 0,9
KSA 0,1

What an embarrassment, in total tiny Israel spends more money than Turkey and KSA combined on R&D. :coffee:
 
. .
Keep believing bro. Believing won't get you far. I remember discussing with you the time you joined this forum. I won't repeat myself again, i hope you can remember what i said regarding my stance on your country's royalty.

2010: 0,1%
2012: 0,25%

Indeed a spring...
 
.
So what indigenous weaponry has Saudi Arabia produced by this R&D?
 
.
We only spend 1.5% of our GDP in R&D?

How disappointing.

At least we are #2 in the overall spending, that is something at least.

EDIT: Actually, compared to the other developing countries, it is not too bad. But it should be much higher.
 
. .

Have you read the article? The author talks about how KSA wants to produce 70% of hardware locally, but then the article keeps on how BAE wants to testablish a military aircraft assembling plant in Saudi Arabia. And KSA's order of new Eurofighters.

KSA is currently good at, is financing western production facilities and being a major importer. 90% of KSA's export is oil and oil related. To change this, KSA needs to establish industry, which they don't have much. And this will take many decades...

KSA has started very late in industry, i don't know if they can be able to keep up with other ME countries like Israel, Iran and Turkey. These 3 have very mature industry, while KSA has close to none.

Edit: Also when you have absolutely no R&D to begin with a 100% growth or even 200% growth does not indicate anything whatsoever. It just shows the extreme poorness of KSA in this field. A luxurious lifestyle, thanks to the endless Oil, has crippled KSA.
 
.
It's rather pathetic for KSA to spend a meager $1.8 billion on RD, consider her resourcefulness, and the OP's chest thumping percentage wise increase claim is also delusive.

But then Uncle Sam certainly wouldn't mind because the arm merchant will keep supplying the Kingdom of defense equipments and has a long term rein on her foreign policies.
 
.
It's rather pathetic for KSA to spend a meager $1.8 billion on RD, consider her resourcefulness, and the OP's chest thumping percentage wise increase claim is also delusive.

But then Uncle Sam certainly wouldn't mind because the arm merchant will keep supplying the Kingdom of defense equipments and has a long term rein on her foreign policies.

Yeah sure because you know each country's spending is just like "You know what? We should throw more money at the R&D box and then research will just come busting out magically" It has nothing to do with setting up infrastructure, OR training scientists, OR creating atmosphere none of that just throwing the money at the R&D box-o-research. Right??

Seriously Education is seriously an URGENT need for many of our dear members in this forum.
 
.
Yeah sure because you know each country's spending is just like "You know what? We should throw more money at the R&D box and then research will just come busting out magically" It has nothing to do with setting up infrastructure, OR training scientists, OR creating atmosphere none of that just throwing the money at the R&D box-o-research. Right??

Seriously Education is seriously an URGENT need for many of our dear members in this forum.


Also the thing with education, i think before anyone else, it applies to you as well. You have a heavy burden, to change the stereotypical Saudi into progressive open-minded people. And the first way to do this it to admitting where you were mistaken and take it from there, instead of rejecting every criticism of your country.

edit: No offense intended
 
.
Yeah sure because you know each country's spending is just like "You know what? We should throw more money at the R&D box and then research will just come busting out magically" It has nothing to do with setting up infrastructure, OR training scientists, OR creating atmosphere none of that just throwing the money at the R&D box-o-research. Right??

Seriously Education is seriously an URGENT need for many of our dear members in this forum.


Nothing come busting out suddenly, however, you have to begin somewhere and take a longer view. What I was saying is that KSA is a rich country and it's for her and her people interests to spend a comparable amount, to the other developed nations, on her long term security developments. A .25% of spending on RD as to to her GDP is simply a negligence practice by the government.

And RD is the continuance of educational developments. What a research scientist suppose to do if the government doesn't spend enough funds for researches.
 
.
Nothing come busting out suddenly, however, you have to begin somewhere and take a longer view. What I was saying is that KSA is a rich country and it's for her and her people interests to spend a comparable, to the other developed nations, on her long term security developments. A .25% of spending on RD as to to her GDP is simply a negligence practice by the government.

No actually it is very impressive and admirable how it raised from 0.05% in 2008 to 0.25%. That is higher than any country in terms of percentage increase which means government has been working harder than any country to raise that percentage. Which is still rising sharply.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom